Amendment FA460025R00020003.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment is to incorporate changes based off the Questions and Answers received. Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

A. Section L has changed the following: L.1.2. Changed to add Volume III, Past Performance. Additionally, set a page limit across all volumes (total) NTE 100 pages. L.2.1.1.2. Updated to be more clear concerning pricing requests. Total price for Section B. Then a breakout for each seed project. L.1.2.2. Included: 11x17 pages are allowed for GANTT charts; 2 pages max (one (1) for each project.

B. Section M has changed the following: M.8.1.1. Updated to be more clear language on how the source selection will be proceeding. M.9.2.3. changed from 5 years to 3 years to be consistent with other areas within Section M. M.9.2.4. Experience Modification Rates (EMR) verbiage deleted from Section.

C. Attachment 5, Offutt MACC SOW, has been updated to revision 1, to incorporate a change based off of a question.

D. Attachment 17, 23 07 00 - Therman Insulation for Mech Systems is attached.

E. A bid Guarantee is required. One (1) for EACH seed project. Please reference FAR 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.

F. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

The following modifications were made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Offer Guarantee Required true

Section J - List of Attachments

The following Attachments were added:

Attachment 17_230700_THERMAL INSULATION FOR MECHANICAL SYSTEMS 2025-04-03 Attachment 5_Offutt AFB MACC SOW_rev1 Attachment 6_SOW_21-0048 Repair Water Line F627

The following Attachments were deleted:

Attachment 5_Offutt AFB MACC SOW Attachment 6_SOW_21-0048 Repair Water Line_F627

Section L - Instructions, Conditions, & Notices to Offerors or Quoters

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L.1.0 General Instructions

(a) The offeror's proposal must include all data and information requested by this Request for Proposal (RFP) and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work. Non-conformance with the instructions provided in this RFP may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

(b) The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements but, rather, shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities or experience and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal.

(c) Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed artwork, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

(d) The proposal acceptance period is specified in the SF1442; paragraph 13(D) of the solicitation. The offeror shall make a clear statement in the SF 1442, paragraph 17 of the proposal documentation volume if their acceptance period differs from the period listed in paragraph 13(D).

L.1.1General Information

L.1.1.1. Point of Contact. The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Administrator (CA) are the sole point of contact for this acquisition. Address any questions or concerns you may have to the CO or CA listed in the solicitation. Written requests for clarification may be sent to the email addresses located in Section G of the solicitation or the www.sam.gov notice.

L.1.1.2. Debriefings. The CO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range or of unacceptable proposals whereupon;

they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. Offerors excluded from the competitive range may request a pre-award debriefing or they may choose to wait until after the source selection decision to request a post-award debriefing. However, offerors excluded from the competitive range are entitled to no more than one debriefing for each proposal. The CO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring a debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

FA460025R00020003

L.1.1.3. Discrepancies. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale as well as the remedies the offeror is asking the CO to consider as related to the omission or error.

The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion. This reservation includes matters of additional or substitute pages of the initial proposal.

L.1.1.4. Electronic Reference Documents. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on www.sam.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications wheninformation has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

L.1.1.5. Teaming Arrangements/Joint Ventures. If the offeror intends to fulfill the requirements of this RFP in a teaming arrangement or joint venture, the offeror must provide complete information as to the arrangement, including identifying the responsibilities of each entity, and the contractual relationships and authorities of the firms involved. The offeror should provide a list of any relevant and recent past/present performance information on previous teaming arrangements or joint ventures with the same teaming or joint venture partner. Joint ventures must align with the current guidance provided by the Small Business Administration (SBA).

For all joint ventures and teaming arrangements offerors are reminded of the work performance requirements of 13 CFR 124.513(d) and Clause 52.219-14, Limitations On Subcontracting, as applicable.

L.1.2. Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. Organization/Number of Copies/Page Limits. The offeror shall prepare the proposal as set forth in the Proposal Organization Table 1 below. The titles and contents of the volumes shall be as defined in this table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies as specified in Table. The contents of each proposal volume are described in the table below:

VOLUME VOLUME TITLE PAGE LIMIT

I Price (includes contract documentation)

II Technical

III Past Performance

Total Page Limit Across ALL volumes, NOT TO EXCEED 100 Pages

L.1.2.1. Page Limitations. Page limitations shall be treated as maximums. If exceeded, the excess pages will not be read or considered in the evaluation of the proposal. Page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notices (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

L.1.2.2 Page Size and Format. A page is defined as each face of a sheet of paper containing information. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Page size shall be 8.5 x 11 inches, not including foldouts. Except for the reproduced sections of the solicitation document, the text size shall be no less than 10 point. 11x17 pages are allowed for GANTT charts; 2 pages max (one (1) for each project) two pages.

L.1.2.3 Pricing Related Data. All pricing information shall be addressed in the Pricing/Contract Documentation volume, in Section B of the Schedule of the RFP.

Information shall be listed in the Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including unit and extended pricing, as specified in Section B of the RFP. Also, a breakdown of the price listed in Section B of the RFP shall be submitted with the proposal. This breakdown shall, at a minimum, contain costs associated with each applicable Construction Division, i.e., General Requirements, Mechanical, Electrical, etc., and include any large equipment or material items specific to this project.

L.2.0 Volume I - Pricing and Contract Documentation

L.2.1 Contract Documentation

L.2.1.1 Model Contract/Representations and Certifications. The purpose of this volume is to provide information to the Government for preparing the contract document and supporting file. The offeror's proposal shall include a signed copy of the SF1442 and any fill-ins listed in Sections I and K. This includes: FAR Clause 52.219-28 in Section I and all the full text clauses in Section K. NOTE: If the offeror has completed these Section K clauses in the System for Award Management (SAM) database, and no changes have been made, the offeror may state this in their proposal in lieu of completing and submitting these clauses as part of their

All sections of the RFP, excluding Instructions to Offerors, Evaluation Procedures and section K- Representations, Certifications and Other Statements of proposal.

Offerors constitute the model contract.

L.2.1.1.1 Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form Completion of blocks 14, 15, 17, 19, and 20A and signature and date for blocks 20B and 20Cof the SF1442.

Signature by the offeror on the SF1442 constitutes an offer, which the Government may accept.

L.2.1.1.2 Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices Completed pricing information in Section B of the solicitation. Section B will have the total price of both seed projects. For each seed project provide a breakdown utilizing a Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown such as an AF3052 of the major elements of your cost proposal to include, at a minimum, materials (and quantity), labor (and quantity / hours), equipment, and any other significant price items relevant to this project.

Subcontractor proposals shall be broken down as well.

L.2.1.2 Exceptions to Solicitation Requirements. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Offerors must clearly identify any exception to the solicitation terms and conditions and provide complete accompanying rationale. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Provide rationale in support of the exception and fully explain its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, price, and specific requirements of the solicitation.

L.2.2 General Instructions

L.2.2.1.1 Price Reasonableness. This section is to assist you in submitting information other than certified cost or pricing data that is required to evaluate the reasonableness and balance of your proposed price. Compliance with these requirements are mandatory and failure to comply may result in rejection of your proposal. Note that unrealistically low or high proposed prices, initially or subsequently, may be grounds for eliminating a proposal from competition either on the basis that the offeror does not understand the requirement or has submitted an unrealistic proposal. Additionally, unbalanced pricing poses an unacceptable risk to the Government and may be a reason to reject an offeror's proposal. Offers should be sufficiently detailed to demonstrate their reasonableness and balance. The burden of proof for credibility of proposed prices rests with the offeror.

L.2.2.1.2 Price Data. Data beyond that required by this instruction shall not be submitted, unless you consider it essential to document or support your price position. All data relating to the proposed price, including all required supporting documentation, must be included in the section of the proposal designated as the Price volume. Under no circumstances shall this data and documentation be included elsewhere in the proposal.

L.2.2.1.3 Rounding. All dollar amounts provided shall be rounded to the nearest dollar.

L.3.0 Volume II - Technical Volume

L.3.1 General. The Technical Volume should be specific and complete. Legibility, clarity, and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the Technical subfactors defined in Section M, Evaluation Factors for Award. Using the instructions provided below, provide as specifically as possible the actual methodology you would use for accomplishing/satisfying these subfactors. All the requirements specified in the solicitation are mandatory. By your proposal submission, you are representing that your firm will perform all the requirements specified in the solicitation. It is not necessary or desirable for you to tell us so in your proposal. Do not merely reiterate the objectives or reformulate the requirements specified in the solicitation.

L.3.2 Format and Specific Content

L.3.2.1 Subfactor 1: Site Management/Key Personnel. The offeror shall submit a management plan/key personnel roster. The management plan/key personnel roster shall address the subfactor 1 areas in Section M of this RFP.

L.3.2.2 Subfactor 2: Quality Control. The offeror shall submit a quality control plan. The quality control plan shall address the subfactor 2 areas in section M of this RFP.

L.3.2.3 Subfactor 3: Experience. The offeror shall submit an experience narrative. The experience narrative shall address the subfactor 3 areas in section M of this RFP.

L.3.2.4 Subfactor 4: Seed Projects.

Seed Project 1: The offeror shall submit a management plan, project schedule (GANTT chart), and experience modification rates for the last five (5) years. At minimum shall address the technical standards for this subfactor identified in Section M of this solicitation. Disclosure of Magnitude is FAR 36.204(d): between $250,000 and $500,000.

Seed Project 2: The offeror shall submit a management plan, project schedule (GANTT chart), and experience modification rates for the last five (5) years. At minimum shall address the technical standards for this subfactor identified in Section M of this solicitation. Disclosure of Magnitude is FAR 36.204(e): between $500,000 and $1,000,000.

L.4. Past Performance

You may submit past performance. The Government will pull offeror's CPARS data to determine if an offers past performance is acceptable or unacceptable. If no data is found, it will be considered an "acceptable" rating.

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

Header Miscellaneous Text (Modified):

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

M.1. Introduction. Offerors are cautioned to completely read this entire solicitation and submit sufficient and correct information, and in the format specified.

Offerors who did not submitted the required information, initially with their proposals, may be rejected as non-responsive.

M.2. Basis for Contract Award. This is a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection in accordance with the following regulations and documents:

- FederalAcquisition Regulation (FAR) part 15, Contracting by Negotiation, assupplemented by:

- DefenseFederal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS)

- DFARSProcedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI)

- Departmentof the Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DAFFARS)

- DAFFARSMandatory Procedures (MP)

- Departmentof Defense (DoD) Source Selection Procedures: Appendix C, August 20, 2022

This regulations and documents available electronically and found at: www.acquisition.gov and https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA000740-22- DPC.pdf.

Award will be made to the lowest priced technically acceptable (LPTA) offeror with an acceptable past performance assessment. The Government intends to award eight (8) contract(s) without discussions. The Government, however, reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed in its best interest. Additionally, the Government reserves the right to award more or less than eight (8) contracts.

Contracts may be awarded to the offerors who are deemed responsible in accordance with FAR part9.1, as supplemented, whose proposals conform to the solicitation requirements(to include all stated terms, conditions, representations, certifications, and all other information required by Section L of this solicitation) and are judged based on the evaluation factors and subfactors, to represent the LPTA proposal having an acceptable past performance rating.

While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the source selection process, by its nature, is subjective; and therefore, professional judgement is implicit throughout the entire process. The offerors selected for award shall receive a task order, for the minimum guaranteed amount of $1,000.00, to attend a pre-construction conference at the Contracting Office. The lowest overall technically acceptable proposal may be awarded the seed project (contingent to the availability of funds); if the seed project is not awarded they will receive minimum guaranteed amount for attendance of the pre-construction meeting (not both).

M.3. Rejection of Unrealistic Offers. The Government reserves the right to reject any proposal that is evaluated to be unrealistic in terms of program commitments, contract terms and conditions, or unrealistically low in price when compared to Government estimates, such that the proposal is deemed to reflect an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of the program.

M.4. Correction Potential of Proposals. The Government may consider, throughout the evaluation, the "correction potential" of any proposal. The judgement of such "correction potential" is within the sole discretion of the Government. If an aspect of an offeror's proposal does not meet the Government's requirements and is not considered correctable through discussions, the offeror may be excluded/eliminated from the competitive range, if established.

The ContractingOfficer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity to forproposal revision. Offerors may be asked to clarify aspects of their proposalor respond to adverse past performance information to which the Offeror has notpreviously had the opportunity to respond. This type of communication or that which is conducted to resolve minor orclerical errors will not constitute discussions.

M.5 Competitive Range / Discussions. The Government reserves the right to open and conduct discussions if it deems them to be necessary. Discussions will be held only if those offerors are determined to be in the competitive range. If discussions are deemed necessary, the Government will establish a competitive range IAW FAR15.306(c). Offerors whose proposals are not included in the competitive range will be notified as soon as practicable. Discussions will include issuance of evaluation notices. An offeror initially included in the competitive range maybe eliminated from consideration for the award during discussions. At the conclusion of discussions, each offeror still in the competitive range shall begiven an opportunity to submit a Final Proposal Revision (FPR). Only offerors deemed "acceptable" in all technical subfactors with acceptable past performance are eligible for award.

M.6. Solicitation Requirements, Terms and Conditions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements; in addition to those items identified as factors or subfactors. Failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the solicitation may result in the offeror being ineligible for award. Offerors must clearly identify any exceptions to the solicitation terms and conditions and must provide complete supporting rationale. The Government reserves the right to determine any such exceptions as unacceptable.

M.7. Debriefing of Offerors. Debriefings are conducted with the goal of identifying where changes can be made to improve in future source selection participation with an unsuccessful offeror. Successful or unsuccessful offerors may request debriefings by providing a written request to the Contracting Officer. Debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.505 and 15.506.

M.8. Evaluation Factors

M.8.1. This is a best value procurement utilizing the LPTA technique, in which competing offerors' technical aspects and past performance are rated as acceptable /unacceptable. In LPTA, tradeoffs do not occur. By submission of its offer in accordance with the instructions provided in Section L, the offeror agrees to the terms and conditions of this Request for Proposal (RFP), and all such offers shall be treated equally.

The factors and subfactors are:

Factor 1: Technical (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

Subfactor 1: Site Management/Key Personnel

Subfactor 2: Quality Control

Subfactor 3: Experience

Subfactor 4: Seed Projects

Factor 2: PastPerformance (Acceptable/Unacceptable)

Factor 3: Price(Acceptable/Unacceptable)

The evaluation process will proceed as follows:

M.8.1.1. The Government intends to award eight (8) MACC award; but reserves the right to award more or less than eight (8) contracts. The offerors selected for a MACC award will receive a task order for the minimum guaranteed amount of $1,000.00 to attend a pre-construction conference at the Contracting Office (except if an offeror receives an award for the seed project). The lowest overall, technically acceptable proposal, may be awarded the seed project and a MACC award ; * whereas, the remaining next lowest, technically acceptable proposals will only receive a MACC award plus the minimum guaranteed amount of $1,000.00. The Government reserves the right not to award a contract, depending on the quality of the proposal(s) submitted and the availability of funds.

The offerors who receive a MACC award, the lowest price for each seed project will receive an award, assuming availability of funds, for said seed project.

(could result in two different contractors receiving the seed project) Each seed project will be evaluated for reasonableness and balanced pricing. If it's found the either project has unreasonable or unbalanced pricing they will be considered unresponsive.

M.8.1.2. The Government will rank the proposals by total overall price (both seed projects combined) and only evaluate the eight (8) lowest priced proposals initially. The Government will then evaluate those eight (8) proposals for Price, Technical, and Past Performance. Any proposals outside this initial evaluation pool will not be evaluated, unless necessary to obtain the desired effective competition of offerors rated as "acceptable" in all technical subfactors and the past performance factor. The eight (8) lowest priced offerors that are technically acceptable with acceptable past performance, determined to be responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, and have a fair and reasonable price will be one of the awardees. In the event that at least one of the initial eight (8) offerors are not rated "acceptable" the evaluation pool will be increased by evaluating the next lowest priced proposal. This process will continue until there are eight (8) "acceptable" proposals or until all offerors' proposals have been evaluated, whichever is reached first. Depending on the amount of proposals received, the Government does reserve the right to evaluate more or less than eight (8) offeror's proposals.

M.8.2. Technical Factor (Volume II). The Government's technical evaluation team shall evaluate the technical proposals on an unacceptable or unacceptable basis, assigning one of the ratings described below for each subfactor. Any subfactor evaluated as "unacceptable" will render the entire proposal unacceptable and therefore un-awardable. Only those proposals determined to be technical acceptable, either initially, or as a result of discussions, will be considered for award.

However, the offeror is remined that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussions.

Table C-1. Technical Acceptable/UnacceptableRating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

The proposals shall be evaluated against the following technical subfactors:

M.9.2.1 Subfactor 1- Site Management / Key Personnel

Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's submitted management plan. Specifically, the adequacy of the offeror's key project management and support staff and their approach to the management of the overall contract and resultant task orders on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. It also evaluates the adequacy of the offeror's approach to subcontractor management, inclusive of design and construction. This document will be incorporated by reference in the resulting contract.

Measure of Merit: This subfactor will be considered acceptable if the offeror's proposal clearly and logically addresses and meets the minimum requirements specified below and within the applicable contract specification. The Offeror will be required to provide their approach to hiring qualified key project and support staff. The standard is met when the proposal:

a. Identifies the Contractor's overall approach to the management of the overall contract and resultant task orders, and provides an organizational diagram showing clear, logical lines of authority from the Program Manager to subcontracting Management, including site investigation, design, site superintendence, and quality control;

b. Identifies the key project management anddedicated support staff by job title, provides a brief job description andqualifications of each staff member (e.g. education, training, professionalqualifications, licenses, and experience relative to the tasks he/she willperform if awarded the contract);

c. Identifies the logical lines and level ofdecision-making authority delegated to management and staff members (as aminimum, program manager shall have on-site decision-making authority);

d. Briefly describes adequate policies andprocedures for subcontractor management, including surveillance, recruitmentand termination, quality control, and scheduling;

M.9.2.2. Subfactor2 - Quality Control

Description: This subfactor evaluates the offeror's submitted quality control plan. Specifically, the adequacy of the offeror's key quality control staff and their approach to the management of the overall quality and resultant task order on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. It also evaluates the adequacy of the offeror's approach to quality control subcontractors, inclusive of design and construction. This document will be incorporated by reference in the resulting contract.

Measure of Merit: This subfactor will be considered acceptable if the offeror's proposal clearly and logically address and meets the minimum requirements specified below and within the applicable contract specification. The offeror will be required to provide their approach to hiring qualified quality control staff. The stand is met when the proposal:

a. Demonstrates an effective and efficient quality management structure and processes that are integrated into the overall management approach and allows management of task order requirements. Demonstrating the ability to maintain an inspection system that is integrated into the overall management approach and meet the requirements of the SOW.

b. Identifies the management and qualitycontrol procedures used for the A-E design process, both by the prime andsubcontractors.

c. Demonstrates capacity to accomplish the workin the required time, complete projects within the established time limits,meeting project dollar thresholds, and current workload.

M.9.2.3. Subfactor3 - Experience

Description: This subfactor evaluates the adequacy of the offeror's past experiences on an acceptable/unacceptable basis. It also evaluates the adequacy of the offeror's approach to provide information on diverse experience, inclusive of design and construction.

Measure of Merit: This subfactor will be considered acceptable if the offeror's proposal clearly and logically addresses and meets the minimum requirements specified below and within the applicable contract specification. The Offeror's past performance will be required through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System(CPARS). The standard is met when the proposal:

Demonstrates specialized recent and relevant experience and technical competence in the type of work required.

Demolition: Shall have three (3) years of demonstrated experience in demolition on a minimum of three (3) projects with a minimum scope of $30,000.00 each.

Demolition of existing facilities ranging from single to multiple stories including foundation. Buildings can be of different construction methods and including capping of utilities, abatement, and site restoration.

acility Repair:F Shall have three (3) years of demonstrated experience in facilities repair, oversight, and management on a minimum of five (5) projects with a minimum scope of $80,000.00 each. Facility repair to include but not limited to interior and exterior renovations to include all disciplines, fire detection and protection, HVAC, flooring, abatement, painting, plumbing, etc.

M.9.2.4. Subfactor 4 - Seed Projects

Seed Project 1: Repair Water Main - Scope of work is for a re-rerouting of a broken 10 inch Transite water line connecting to Building 500. The work will route F627 the new line around an installed storm drain line and bore under a road to reconnect to the existing pipe.

Management Plan: Comprehensive plans that demonstrate a clear understanding of the work and an ability to coordinate resources to ensure successful pursuit of the work will be considered to meet the requirements. Plans that do not demonstrate a clear understanding of the work, that do not demonstrate a capability to coordinate resources or that do not demonstrate appropriate excess capacity will be considered to not meet the requirements. Plans will be evaluated based on the level of involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed by subcontractors. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will evaluate the clarity, adequacy and capabilities of the offeror's organizational chart on managing a successful project. An organizational chart that clearly depicts a highly qualified on-site team supported by appropriate resources off-site and that clearly defines responsibilities will be considered to meet the requirements.

Schedule: Overall project schedule is to verify the contractor's experience in understanding the project scope, submittal schedules, equipment procurement and delivery, installation, key milestones, and contract required schedule constraints. Submitted schedule shall be legible and in GANTT chart format. Show task durations, including Government review times for submittals (30 calendar days as a buffer) where applicable, start and finish milestones, and relationships. The from date of issuance of Notice To Proceed (NTP). The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of period of performance is 90 calendar days calendar days, after the NTP date, by which milestones are to be achieved. At a minimum, the schedule must address:

a. Mobilization and preparatory work

b. Submittal Review

c. Long lead order items

d. Testing and Commission complete

e. Training complete

The Offeror may choose a critical path or other method; however, project schedule shall be graphically represented. Include necessary, extra, or unusual efficiencies that will be required to meet the schedule. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the Offeror's understanding of the scope and complexity, and the contractor's capability to execute the project.

Seed Project 2: Repair HVAC at B1226 -Provide full lifecycle HVAC renovation at Building 1226 to include the heat pumps. Fully upgrading replacement of all HVAC equipment and controllers.

Management Plan: Comprehensive plans that demonstrate a clear understanding of the work and an ability to coordinate resources to ensure successful pursuit of the work will be considered to meet the requirements. Plans that do not demonstrate a clear understanding of the work, that do not demonstrate a capability to coordinate resources or that do not demonstrate appropriate excess capacity will be considered to not meet the requirements. Plans will be evaluated based on the level of involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed by subcontractors. The Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) will evaluate the clarity, adequacy and capabilities of the offeror's organizational chart on managing a successful project. An organizational chart that clearly depicts a highly qualified on-site team supported by appropriate resources off-site and that clearly defines responsibilities will be considered to meet the requirements.

Schedule: Overall project schedule is to verify the contractor's experience in understanding the project scope, submittal schedules, equipment procurement and delivery, installation, key milestones, and contract required schedule constraints. Submitted schedule shall be legible and in GANTT chart. Show task durations, including Government review times for submittals (30 calendar days as a buffer)where applicable, start and finish milestones, and relationships. The period of

The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, performance is 365 calendar days from date of issuance of Notice To Proceed (NTP).

after the NTP date, by which milestones are to be achieved. At a minimum, the schedule must address:

a. Mobilization and preparatory work

b. Submittal Review

c. Long lead order items

d. Testing and Commission complete

e. Training complete

The Offeror may choose a critical path or other method; however, project schedule shall be graphically represented. Include necessary, extra, or unusual efficiencies that will be required to meet the schedule. The Government will evaluate the schedule to assess the Offeror's understanding of the scope and complexity, and the contractor's capability to execute the project.

M.9.3. Past Performance Factor

The Past Performance evaluation results in an assessment of the offeror's probability of meeting the solicitation requirements. Offerors must receive a past performance rating of 'acceptable" to be eligible for award.

M.9.3.1. Ratings: The Past Performance factor will receive one of the ratings described below:

Table C-2. Past PerformanceAcceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government has reasonable expectation that the offeror will

Acceptable successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror's performance record is unknown (see note above).

Unacceptable

Based on the offeror's performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

NOTE: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305(a) (2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered acceptable

M.9.3.2. Evaluation Process: The past performance evaluation considers each offeror's demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance in supplying products and services that meet the solicitation requirements. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government will use information obtained from other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to: the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS); Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS); Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), or other databases.

a. The contracting office will pull offeror's CPARS records from the past three (3) years from the date of the issuance of Recency Assessment:

the solicitation.

b. Relevancy Assessment: The Government will pull offeror's CPARS records that will be relevant to construction projects valued at least $500,000.00.

c. Quality of Performance: The Past Performance Evaluation Team will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror's performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information. A separate quality assessment rating is not required; rather, the past performance rating, using the Acceptable/Unacceptable rating, is based on the offeror's overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance

M.9.4. Price Factor

The offeror's price proposal, as described in Section L, will be evaluated as follows:

M.9.4.1. The price factor will be evaluated using the Seed Projects Pricing Proposal

M.9.4.2. Price Reasonableness: Offeror's price proposal will be evaluated for reasonableness. Additionally, the offeror's price proposal will be evaluated, for awards purposes. The offeror's price proposal will be evaluated to ensure it is fair and reasonable, pursuant to FAR 15.404. For additional information see FAR31.201-3.

M.9.4.3. Balanced Pricing: Offeror's price proposal(s) will be reviewed for balance among all Total Evaluated Price (TEP) Worksheet Line Items in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(g). Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total cost/price, the cost/price of one or more line items is significantly over or understated as demonstrated by application of cost or price analysis techniques. The government will analyze offers to determine whether they are unbalanced with respect to cost/price. Per FAR52.215-1(f)(8), the Government may determine a proposal unacceptable if the prices proposed are materially unbalanced between line items. The Government may also consider an offer unbalanced if there is a significant difference between proposed prices from year to year, such that they are above or below what would be considered a reasonable adjustment for inflation. A proposal may be rejected if the Contracting Officer determines the lack of balances poses an unacceptable risk to the Government.

M.9.4.4. The estimated volume of work is based on the maximum contract value of$49,999,999.00 over a five (5) year ordering period split between all awardees.

Offerors should not consider this figure as any indication of proposed contract usage during this contract period.

M. 9.4.5. Total Evaluated Price. The seed projects will be evaluated for price. Each project will be priced on a Construction Cost Estimate Breakdown for BOTH the prime and subcontractors.

The Offeror shall provide a Price Sheet which clearly states the proposal effort title, project number, and summarizes the total of the two (2) seed projects. Offerors shall also submit pricing data by cost element. The Offeror shall identify and provide rationale for all non-labor cost elements required for performance. Adequate price competition per FAR 15.403-1(c)(1) is anticipated and may exist if, in part, two (2) or more offers are received that satisfy the Government's requirements.

Offerors' total Evaluated Prices (TEPs) (seed projects combined)may be used to ensure price reasonableness. Ensure each dollar amount listed in the Technical Proposal/Sample Project proposal includes all allowable contractor costs, including, but not limited to, supervision, bonding, overhead, general and administration (G&A), site overhead, quality control, insurance, and profit.

BLDG 323C CP 402 232 6459, 106 PEACEKEEPER DR STE 2N3

OFFUTT AFB, NE 68113

UNITED STATES

Michael Madison, Email: michael.madison.2@us.af.mil Telephone: 402-232-0845 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: