Exhibit 2 Past Performance Questionnaire and Letter.doc
DOC document 73 KB Posted
- Attached to
- COCESS Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4528-11-R-0001
About this file
Exhibit 2 Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit 1 Bid Schedule Updated.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FA4528-11-R-0001-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit 3 Responsibility Questionnaire.doc | DOC document | |
| Exhibit 4 Performance Plan.doc | DOC document | |
| SF 1449.doc | DOC document | |
| Appendix 2 Historical Non-Store Stocked High Use Item Listing.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| COCESS SOW - FINAL.docx | DOCX document | |
| Appendix 3 COCESS Monthly Price Comparison.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Appendix 4 COCESS Daily Sales Report.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Appendix 1 Historical Store Stock High Use Item Listing.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Exhibit 1 Bid Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Appendix 5 Floor Plan.pdf -.pdf |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
5TH MISSION SUPPORT GROUP (AFGSC)
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA
SOLICITATION FA4528-10-R-0018
ATTACHMENT 3
SOLICITATION FA4528-11-R-0001
EXHIBIT 2
MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS
FROM: 5th Contracting Squadron/LGCS 211 Missile Ave
Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire
1. The 5th Contracting Squadron, Minot AFB, North Dakota, is in the process of selecting a contractor for a Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store (COCESS).
2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.
3. Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Please complete this questionnaire by indicating your rating and providing comments wherever applicable. For any ratings above or below satisfactory, please provide an explanation on how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet your requirement and attach it to your response. This can be a copy of a performance evaluation, discrepancy report, or other documentation. Once complete, please sign the document in the space provided.
4. Please note, we may contact the Offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken. However, the individual's name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed to the Offeror.
5. Your time and effort in providing this vital information is greatly appreciated and is critical to our evaluation. Please return the completed questionnaire as soon as possible but no later than the offer due date noted in the Solicitation. Please obtain this date from your COCESS contractor. You may fax it to (701) 723-2895, attention Wanda Thompson or mail it to the following address:
5 CONS/LGCS
ATTN: Wanda Thompson 211 Missile Ave
Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027
Email: wanda.thompson@minot.af.mil
6. If you have any questions, please contact Wanda Thompson, Contract Administrator, at (701) 723-4180. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.
//SIGNED//
ANGELA B. KLEIN
Contracting Officer
Attachment:
Past Performance Questionnaire
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONAIRE
The below-named contractor/offeror is being considered for award of a contract for Contractor Operated Civil Engineer Supply Store (COCESS) at Minot AFB ND. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts. Please make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Completed questionnaires can be returned via fax, email or mail to the following:
MAIL:
5th Contracting Squadron/ LGCS
Attn: Wanda Thompson
211 Missile Ave
Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027
FAX: 701-723-2895
EMAIL: wanda.thompson@minot.af.mil
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
Offeror’s Name:_______________________________________________________________________________
Address:_____________________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number:________________________ Point of Contact:______________________________________
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION
Name:_____________________________________ Title:_____________________________________________
Organization & Address:_________________________________________________________________________
Telephone: ___________________ FAX:__________________ Email:___________________________________
C. CONTRACT INFORMATION
Contract Title:_________________________________________________________________________________ Period of Performance:__________________________ Contract Number:________________________________ Total contract value, including all modifications and options:____________________________________________ Annual contract expenditures:_____________________________________________________________________ Total occupied square footage of facilities supported:__________________________________________________ Number of separate and distinct commodities provided under contract:_____________________________________
Description of contract effort:_____________________________________________________________________ (Include whether the effort supported a multi craft facility maintenance operation providing building supplies, repair parts and system components to carpenters, electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning mechanics, plumbers, and entomologists)
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
The Air Force will use your survey responses to determine a level of confidence, based on the offeror’s past performance record, concerning the offeror’s ability to successfully perform our requirement in accordance with the contract. Please assign the following performance level codes to each of the questioned areas listed below based on the contractor’s performance at your organization or installation. The confidence codes selected will indicate the degree of doubt concerning performance in each area.
RESPONDENT WILL NOT FURNISH ANY PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO OFFEROR SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THIS SOLICITATION.
Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| E |
| EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| VG |
| VERY GOOD - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| S |
| SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory. |
| M |
| MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| US |
| UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| N/A |
| NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score. |
Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated E (Exceptional), M (Marginal) or US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).
E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AREAS
Please use the above ratings and their assigned definitions to describe the offeror’s performance in the following areas:
| 1. Contractor’s ability to provide user access to the system via a web browser without requiring client software |
| E |
| VG |
| S |
| M |
| US |
| N/A |
2. Contractor ability to provide a fully functional web-based purchasing system with standard industry capabilities to include, but not limited to, the ability to conduct product market research across multiple supplier websites, transmit/receive transactions via the Internet, view order history, view live order tracking/status and modify/cancel orders not shipped yet by individual work order number, attach notes to the purchase order (for internal use only), and the ability to delete purchase order either singularly or by “batch” prior to release.
3. Contractor’s ability to track orders and receive status of orders
4. Contractor’s ability to perform a search using a generic description or keyword for items listed in the catalogs
5. Overall contract compliance in providing correct the commodity items on time and at a fair and reasonable price
6. Contractor maintained acceptable level of stock items for immediate issue/purchase
7. Contractor provided on-time delivery within original delivery date
8. Contractor’s overall quality of customer service
9. Contractor’s willingness and effectiveness in correcting identified deficiencies
10. Overall quality of service
11. Contractor met all applicable environmental requirements
12. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements
13. Contractor effectively managed materials requirements: (i.e. maintained adequate stock levels)
14. Contractor maintained records/reported data
15. Contractor’s overall management and responsiveness
COMMENTS/REMARKS________________________________________________________________________
1. If a government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices?_____________ If yes, please describe:
2. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor?_______
Please explain response below:
3. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance? E VG G M US N/A
Signature of Respondent___________________________________ Date____________
Job Title:________________________________________________________________
Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.
LEGEND OF TERMS
OFFEROR: The contractor for which past performance is being evaluated
SOLICITATION NUMBER: The procurement document number the government uses to identify a specific Request for Proposal (RFP)
RESPONDENT: The person and/or organization evaluating past performance
CONTRACT NUMBER: If the offeror had a contract or purchase order with your company/firm, the identifying contract number associated with awarded contract/purchase order
CONTRACT TITLE: Project title of work performed
CONTRACT VALUE: Contract/purchase order total dollar value, including all modifications and options
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK: Describe type of work being performed, to include whether the effort supported a multi craft facility maintenance operation providing building supplies, repair parts and system components to carpenters, electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning mechanics, plumbers, and entomologists.
SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .