Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 37 KB Posted

Attached to
Packing, containerization, and local drayage of Direct Procurement Method (DPM) personal property shipments
Solicitation number
FA4528-10-R-0002
Issued by

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amended Solicitation.pdf PDF
PWS 09.doc DOC document
Performance Plan Packing and Crating 09.pdf PDF
Solicitation.pdf PDF
Responsibility Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Bid Schedule Blank for Minot AFB 2010 Award.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

HEADQUARTERS 5TH MISSION SUPPORT GROUP (ACC)

MINOT AIR FORCE BASE, NORTH DAKOTA

FA4528-10-R-0002

Attachment 4

MEMORANDUM FOR PROSPECTIVE EVALUATORS

FROM: 5th Contracting Squadron/LGCS 211 Missile Ave Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire

1. The 5th Contracting Squadron, Minot AFB, North Dakota, is in the process of selecting a contractor for Packing, Containerization and Local Drayage of Direct Procurement Method (DPM) Personal Property Shipments.

2. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the Offeror’s past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the Offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had first hand experience with an Offeror, for the evaluation of the Offeror's performance on those contracts.

3. Our areas of interest in the Offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Please complete this questionnaire by indicating your rating and providing comments wherever applicable. For any ratings above or below satisfactory, please provide an explanation on how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet your requirement and attach it to your response. This can be a copy of a performance evaluation, discrepancy report, or other documentation. Once complete, please sign the document in the space provided.

4. Please note, we may contact the Offeror on problem areas or concerns identified to see what corrective actions have been taken or will be taken. However, the individual's name completing the questionnaire will not be disclosed to the Offeror.

5. Your time and effort in providing this vital information is greatly appreciated and is critical to our evaluation. Please return the completed questionnaire as soon as possible but no later than the offer due date noted in the Solicitation. Please obtain this date from your Packing & Crating contractor. The completed document should be marked Source Selection Sensitive/For Official Use Only. You may fax it to (701) 723-2895, attention A1C Todd Tevis or mail it to the following address:

5 CONS/LGCS

ATTN: A1C Todd Tevis 211 Missile Ave Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027 Email: todd.tevis@minot.af.mil

6. If you have any questions, please contact A1C Todd Tevis, Contract Administrator, at (701) 723-7080 or DSN 453-7080. Thank you for your cooperation and quick response to this request.

//SIGNED//

ANGELA B. KLEIN
Contracting Officer

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

PACKING AND CRATING SERVICES

(THE OFFEROR SHALL PROVIDE THIS ATTACHMENT TO CUSTOMERS, INDIVIDUALS OR OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICES WHO HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE OFFEROR'S PAST AND PRESENT PERFORMANCE)

Please fax or mail the completed questionnaire no later than the offer due date located in the Solicitation (verified with your Packing and Crating contractor) to:

A1C Todd Tevis

5 CONS/LGCS

211 Missile Ave.

Minot AFB, ND 58705-5027 Fax: (701) 723-2895 Email: todd.tevis@minot.af.mil

Part 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

********************The Contractor Must Fill out This Section********************

(Customer must circle concur or does not concur on the following page)

Contract Information: Complete the following information on the contractor that provided or is currently providing services for your company.

a. Contractor’s Name/Address/Phone:

b. Contract Number: _________________________

c. Program Title: ____________________________

d. Contract Type: |_| Firm-Fixed-Price |_| Indefinite-Delivery/Indefinite Quantity |_| Cost-Reimbursement

e. Period of Performance of the contract: _______________________

f. Period of Performance you are assessing: _________________________

g. Base Period Contract Dollar Value: ______________________

h. Total Contract Dollar Value (including all option periods): __________________________

i. Description of service provided: (Please include any unusual or special requirements)

________________________________
Contractor’s Signature Date

Part 2: EVALUATION

*********************The Customer Must Fill Out Remaining Sections*********************

Customer concurs / does not concur with contractor’s statements on previous page.

Performance Information: Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate rating using the scale provided. For ratings above or below satisfactory, please comment on how the contractor either exceeded your requirement or how the contractor failed to meet your requirement. If the contractor had problems in a specific area, but you determined them to have no impact on the mission, please specify this in your narrative remarks. If the statement is not applicable, circle N for “Neutral”.

When responding to this questionnaire, please use the following definitions as a guide:

Performance Confidence Assessment

S.SubstantialBased on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
C.SatisfactoryBased on the offeror’s performance record, the government has an expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.
L.LimitedBased on the offeror’s performance record, the government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

N. No Confidence Based on the offeror’s performance record, the government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

U. Unknown No performance record is identifiable or the offeror’s performance record is so limited that no confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

1. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

a. Contractor complied with the requirements for Packing and Crating Service.
S C L N U
b.. Contractor complied with all USAF regulations.
S C L N U
c. Overall compliance.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

a. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with technical and administrative abilities to meet contract requirements.
S C L N U
b. Contractor maintained appropriate staffing levels (number/ qualifications). Please comment if workload varied.
S C L N U
c. Contractor effectively managed materials and equipment requirements (i.e., effectively controlled customer property).
S C L N U
d. Contractor effectively oversaw/managed subcontractors.
S C L N U
e. Contractor maintained records/reported data.
S C L N U
f. Contractor effectively operated/maintained training program for personnel.
S C L N U
g. Contract Manager acted promptly to resolve problems at all levels to insure work quality.
S C L N U
h. Contractor provided adequate project supervision.
S C L N U
i. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
S C L N U
j. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
S C L N U
k. Contractor demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
S C L N U
l. Contractor’s overall management effectiveness.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. QUALITY OF SERVICE AND WORKMANSHIP

a. Contractor maintained acceptable standards of workmanship.
S C L N U
b. Contractor had adequate equipment to perform contract requirements.
S C L N U
c. Contractor’s overall quality of service.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

4. TIMELINESS/ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULES

a. Contractor completed scheduled tasks within stated time frames.
S C L N U
b. Contractor was proactive in keeping you informed of schedule changes if they were going to occur.
S C L N U
c. Contractor responded to emergency requirements in a timely manner.
S C L N U
d. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
S C L N U
e. Overall contractor timeliness.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. QUALITY CONTROL

a. Contractor provided an adequate quality control plan.
S C L N U
b. Contractor adhered to its quality control plan.
S C L N U
c. Contractor’s quality control resulted in little/no work on your part to achieve acceptable service (i.e. few failed inspections).
S C L N U
d. Contractor documented its quality control checks/corrective actions.
S C L N U
e. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
S C L N U
f. Corrected deficiencies in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
S C L N U
g. Contractor identified risks/problems as they occurred.
S C L N U
h. Contractor suggested alternative approaches to problems.
S C L N U
i. Contractor displayed initiative to solve problems.
S C L N U
j. Contractor has infrequent complaints of damage to customer goods.
S C L N U
k. Contractor’s overall quality control.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

a. Contractor maintained a professional working relationship.
S C L N U
b. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in resolving customer complaints.
S C L N U
c. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements.
S C L N U
d. Contractor was responsive to contract claims.
S C L N U
e. Overall customer satisfaction.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

7. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL/LABOR/SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

a. Contractor met all applicable environmental requirements.
S C L N U
b. Contractor complied with all applicable labor laws.
S C L N U
c. Contractor provided a safe workplace.
S C L N U
d. Overall compliance.
S C L N U

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

1. Did the contractor respond in a timely manner to claims for breakage/damage/missing items and quickly reimburse the customer?

|_| Yes (please explain) |_| No

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. During the course of the contract, was notification sent to the contractor identifying unsatisfactory work?

|_| Yes (please explain) |_| No

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

3. Has the contractor ever been given a cure notice, a show cause notice, a suspension of payment, or had a claim denied?

|_| Yes (please explain)
|_| No

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

4. Based on your judgment of the contractor’s performance, would you award the contractor another Government contract?

|_| Yes
|_| No (please explain)

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

5. Please rate the overall consistency and reliability of the contractor’s performance.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

6. Please rate overall customer satisfaction with the contractor's performance.

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Neutral Marginal Unsatisfactory

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

Part 3: EVALUATOR INFORMATION

The following information will help us track the responses received, as well as resolve whatever differences may arise between your perception of the contractor’s performance and the contractor’s perception of their performance. You are advised that the Air Force FAR Supplement (AFFARS) requires that the Offeror be given an opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information.

a. Evaluator’s Name:

b. Title:

c. Telephone Number: DSN: Commercial:

d. Organization, Office Symbol, and Address:

e. Length of involvement in the contract:

f. Date of questionnaire completion:

Again, thank you for your time and effort in assisting us with our requirement.

//SIGNED//
ANGELA B. KLEIN
Contracting Officer

Global Power For America image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .