COMBINED SYNOPSIS/ SOLICITATION FOR COMMERCIAL ITEMS

1 April 2026

MEMORANDUM FOR ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS

FROM: 60TH CONTRACTING SQUADRON

350 HANGAR AVE, BLDG. 549

TRAVIS AFB, CA 94535-2632

SUBJECT: Request for Quotation (RFQ), FA442726Q1053, Elevated Work Platform (EWP) Systems Maintenance and Repair

1. This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial products or commercial services prepared in accordance with FAR 12. This announcement constitutes the only solicitation. Offers are being requested and a separate written solicitation will not be issued.

2. Solicitation number FA442726Q1053 is issued as an RFQ for Elevated Work Platform (EWP) Systems Maintenance and Repair.

3. This acquisition is 100% Small Business Set-Aside. This solicitation incorporates provisions and clauses by reference. The full text of provisions and clauses may be accessed electronically at www.acquisition.gov.

4. This is not a Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) rated acquisition.

5. The contractor shall provide the requirement under a Firm Fixed Priced contract in accordance with (IAW) attached Performance Work Statement (PWS). The following table below contains the Contract Line Item Numbers (CLIN) items to be acquired.

Vendor Information

Business Name:

Address:

CAGE Code:

SAM UEI: SAM Registration Expiration Date:

Socioeconomic Status (Check all that apply):

( ) Small Business ( ) SDB ( ) HUBZone ( ) Woman-Owned SB ( ) SDVOSB ( ) 8(a) ( ) EDWOSB ( ) Other – Please State:

Point of Contact Name/Phone Number:

Point of Contact Email:

http://www.acquisition.gov/

CLIN SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUESTED QTY U/I Unit Price Extended Amount

BASE YEAR (1 MAY 26 - 30 APR 27)

Maintenance & Inspection IAW PWS (Annual)

EA

BASE YEAR [1 MAY 26 – 30 APR

27]

(Quarterly)

0003 BASE YEAR - (1 MAR 26 – 30 Apr 27)

Parts and Repair IAW PWS

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

OPTION 1 [1 MAY 27 – 30 APR 28]

OPTION 1 [1 MAY 27 – 30 APR 28]

1003 OPTION 1 [1 MAY 27 – 30 APR 28]

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be

OPTION 2 [1 MAY 28 – 30 APR 29]

OPTION 2 [1 MAY 28 – 30 APR 29]

2003 OPTION 2 [1 MAY 28 – 30 APR 29]

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be

OPTION 3 [1 MAY 29 – 30 APR 30]

OPTION 3 [1 MAY 29 – 30 APR 30]

3003 OPTION 3 [1 MAY 29 – 30 APR 30]

Parts and Repair IAW PWS

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be

OPTION 4 [1 MAY 30 – 30 APR 31]

OPTION 4 [1 MAY 30 – 30 APR 31]

4003 OPTION 4 [1 MAY 30 – 30 APR 31]

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be

6 Month Ext [1 MAY 31 – 31 OCT 31]

6 Month Ext [1 MAY 31 – 31 OCT 31]

5003 6 Month Ext [1 MAY 31 – 31 OCT 31]

1 LOT

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

Not Applicable price to be determined per events

TOTAL COST (USD): $

PROPOSED WARRANTY (IF APPLICABLE):

6. See attached PWS for description of requirements.

7. See attached PWS for date(s) and place(s), as applicable, of delivery and acceptance. This acquisition shall be F.O.B Destination.

8. See Attachment 1 for a list of solicitation provisions that apply to the acquisition.

9. See Attachment 1 for a list of contract clauses that apply to the acquisition.

10. The date, time, and place for receipt of offer.

Posted Date: 1 Apr 2026 RFQ Response Deadline: 15 Apr 2026 12:00 PM PDT. Offers of offer revisions received after the solicitation close date/time will not be accepted unless requested by the CO.

Submission Method Offers must be submitted electronically via email to both Point of Contacts

Questions (If needed) All questions concerning this solicitation must be submitted to the Point of Contacts no later than 6 Apr 2026 at 12:00 PM PDT. Any inquiry submitted past this deadline will not be accepted.

11. Point of contact.

Contract Specialist Clark Teninty clark.teninty.1@us.af.mil Contracting Officer Juliet Diggs juliet.diggs.1@us.af.mil Organization Address 60th Contracting Squadron (60 CONS)

350 Hangar Avenue, Bldg. 549, Travis AFB, CA, 94535

12. Reserved.

13. The Product Service Code for this acquisition is J035 – Maintenance/Repair/Rebuild of Equipment—Service and Trade Equipment. The NAICS code for this acquisition is 811310 - Commercial and Industrial Machinery and Equipment (except Automotive and Electronic) Repair and Maintenance.

a. Reserved.

b. Reserved.

c. The items are subject to the WTO GPA and/or a Free Trade Agreement by citing the FAR Clause and Required language shown at FAR 5.101(4)(iii).

d. Technical Data: All necessary information is contained within this solicitation and its attachments.

e. Reserved.

f. All responsible sources may submit a quotation and will be considered.

g. Reserved.

h. Reserved.

15. Instructions, Provisions, and Evaluation Factors

a. 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

(1) The provision at FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) apply to this solicitation. In addition, the following addendums identified below applies.

(2) Addendum to FAR 52.212-1(a), Submission of offers.

mailto:clark.teninty.1@us.af.mil mailto:juliet.diggs.1@us.af.mil

(3) The Offeror shall complete the Vendor Information and Pricing section under paragraph 5 of this solicitation.

(4) The Offeror shall complete and submit the Contractor Responsibility Verification form (Attachment 2), along with supporting documentations required by the form.

(5) The Offeror shall submit a Technical Capability Statement that strongly supports the contractor’s ability to satisfy the contract requirements IAW the PWS. The capability statement shall include all required permits, licenses and certifications. The information submitted must be sufficient for the Government to assess if your capability will successfully satisfy the requirements of PWS.

(6) The offeror shall submit references by completing the Past Performance List of References (Attachment 3), for contracts that you consider relevant in demonstrating your ability to fulfil the requirement of the PWS. Additionally, the offeror shall ensure that the references listed in Attachment 3 are provided with the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment

4) for completion. The PPQ’s are to be submitted by your listed references to our office. Previous PPQs are accepted, however they must be recent (within the last three (3) years from date of receipt of solicitation) and must be relevant to the requirement of the PWS.

(7) The contractor’s offer must meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unless requested from the Contracting Officer, quote revisions received after the solicitation close date/time will not be accepted. Responses should contain your best terms and conditions.

The government reserves the right to evaluate the quotes and award without interchanges.

(8) The government will not accept any refurbished equipment; all equipment provided must be new.

(9) Addendum to FAR 52.212-1(b) Period for acceptance of offers. The Offeror agrees, by submitting an offer, to hold the prices for 60 calendar days from the date specified for receipt of offers.

b. 52.212-2 Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

(1) The provision at FAR 52.212-2, Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) apply to this solicitation. In addition, the following addendums identified below applies.

(2) Addendum to FAR 52.212-2(a), Evaluation factors.

(3) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

(4) The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Price Technical Past Performance

(5) Price - The Government will evaluate offers by adding the total price of CLIN’s for all options to the total price for the basic requirement in order to determine the total quoted price for each offer (Base + 4 option years, and 6-month option to extend). Offerors will then be arranged according to price, from lowest priced offer to the highest priced offer. The Government may determine an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. A comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation is the preferred and intended price analysis technique. If not feasible, the government will determine price fair reasonableness by comparing the proposed prices to the result of the government’s market research and/or other reasonable basis. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(6) Technical – Technical capability is evaluated as Acceptable/Unacceptable.

(a) The Government will review the contractor’s Technical Capability Statement and evaluate if it will successfully satisfy the requirements of PWS. The rating table provided below will be used to evaluate Technical Capability.

Acceptable Unacceptable

The offeror’s technical capability statement provided sufficient information regarding their ability to successfully fulfill the requirement of the PWS.

The offeror’s technical capability statement did not provide sufficient information regarding their ability to successfully fulfill the requirement of the PWS.

(7) Past Performance - Of the offers, having acceptable the technical evaluation, the government will begin evaluating past performance starting with the lowest priced offeror. The government will review the contractor's relevant past performance (within the last 3 years from solicitation date). The review includes but not limited to: verifying if any previous Federal Contracts performed by the offeror has been rated in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS), verifying the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) submitted by the offeror's references, and contacting the references provided by the offeror to verify past performance if no PPQ was received and is deemed necessary by the government. The government may also utilize the Contracting Officer's knowledge of the contractor's performance.

The purpose of the past performance evaluation is to allow the government to assess the offeror's ability to perform the services described in the PWS, based on the offeror's demonstrated past performance. The assessment process will result in an overall performance confidence assessment of Substantial Confidence, Satisfactory Confidence, Neutral Confidence, Limited Confidence, or No Confidence as defined below:

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence

Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation the offeror will successfully perform the requirement.

Satisfactory Confidence performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation the offeror will successfully perform the requirement.

Neutral Confidence

No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse, no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence performance record, the Government has a low expectation the offeror will successfully

No Confidence performance record, the Government has no expectation the offeror will successfully

(a) The Government will evaluate past performance for recency and relevancy.

Recency is defined as performance of similar services within the past three (3) years from the issue date of the solicitation. Relevancy is defined as services of the same magnitude of the requirement.

(b) If the lowest priced offer, having acceptable technical evaluation receives a Substantial Performance Confidence Rating, that offer represents the best value for the Government and the evaluation process stops at this point; an award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. In the event the lowest priced offeror, having acceptable technical evaluation does not receive a Substantial Performance Confidence Rating, the evaluation process will continue with the next lowest priced offeror until an offeror receives a Substantial Performance Confidence Rating or all offers are evaluated. In the event that no offeror receives a Substantial Performance Confidence Rating, the Contracting Officer will perform an integrated best value evaluation to determine the eventual awardee. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the lowest priced offeror.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Provisions and Clauses

2. Contractor Responsibility Verification

3. Past Performance List of References

4. Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ)

5. TAFB Security Requirements

6. Performance Work Statement (PWS)

7. Wage Determination 2015-5655 Revision 25, 03 Dec 20