Attachment 6 - Evaluation Factors.pdf
PDF 165 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dead Bird and Waste Removal, Altus AFB Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA441924Q0012
About this file
This document provides evaluation factors for solicitation number FA441924Q0012 for dead bird and waste removal services at Altus Air Force Base. Price and technical acceptability will be evaluated, with the award going to the technically acceptable offer with the lowest total evaluated price, calculated as the total price for the base year and four option years plus an additional 50% of the fourth option year price representing the potential cost of exercising the option to extend services clause. Technically acceptable offers will clearly meet all requirements in the attached performance work statement.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 7 - Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation - Printed PDF Version.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 - Hangar Floor Plans.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 - Updated Dead Bird and Waste Removal PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 - Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 - Wage Determination - 2015-5329 Rev. 22 - 18 Jul 23.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Instructions to offerers.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Site Visit Instructions.pdf | ||
| Combined_Synopsis_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - Dead Bird and Waste Removal PWS.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
52.212-2 EVALUATION--COMMERCIAL ITEMS (NOV 2021)
As prescribed in 12.301(c), the Contracting Officer may insert a provision substantially as follows:
Evaluation—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)
(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
Price Technical Acceptability
(End of provision)
ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-2:
Best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable quote with the lowest evaluated price.
By submission of its quote, the vendor accepts all solicitation requirements, including all technical requirements and terms and conditions. Failure to conform to solicitation requirements may result in a quote being determined not awardable without further evaluation. The evaluation criteria are detailed below:
Factor 1 – Price. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The Government reserves the right to award to other than the low quote for a higher quality item.
Prices will be evaluated on the Total Evaluated Price (TEP). TEP shall be the total of all years, base year and four
(4) option years, plus an additional 50% of the total of Option Year 4. The additional 50% represents the total cumulative price of 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services. Should FAR clause 52.217-8, Option to Extend Services, be exercised in the future, the price will be pro-rated to the actual performance required.
Factor 2 – Technical. The purpose of the technical factor is to assess whether the vendor’s quoted item meets all of the provided information from the Performance Work Statement. Each vendor’s quote will be evaluated against technical requirements and will be assigned a rating of “acceptable” or “unacceptable.” Technical submission must be completed using a secondary document. The Technical information shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Quotes shall not simply rephrase or restate the Performance Work Statement or contain general statements such as “Standard procedures will be employed.” Proposals shall provide convincing rationale addressing how the technical portion of the offer meets solicitation requirements. Offerors shall assume the Government has no prior knowledge of the offeror’s experience. The Government will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offer.
Rating Description:
“Acceptable” - Quote clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
“Unacceptable” - Quote does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
The quote will be determined technically acceptable if it meets the requirements set out in the Attachment 1 - Performance Work Statement.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .