Attachment 4 - RFIs.pdf

PDF 254 KB Posted

Attached to
Long Distance and Local Telephone Services
Solicitation number
FA441725Q0321
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Request for Information (RFI) for Local & Long-Distance Telephone Services (Solicitation FA441725Q0321) from the United States Air Force (USAF). The RFI includes 13 key questions and answers about the telecommunications requirements, with critical details including: the incumbent service provider is Lumen/CenturyLink, the USAF manages existing Cisco equipment, and the requirement involves 5 PRI circuits at each of two locations (103 CCLs at 91023 and 104 CCLs at 90624). The government will require route diversity but not carrier diversity, and 911 calls will be routed through the UC IP network.

Accompanying the RFI are detailed traffic summary reports showing call volume across local and long-distance communications from September 1-24, 2025. These reports break down average call volumes by hour, with peak times between 09:00-14:00, where total calls range from 142-209 per hour. The data includes separate breakdowns for local, long-distance, and total call volumes, providing granular insights into communication patterns. Additionally, the RFI notes that the technical response page limit was increased from 10 to 15 pages to allow offerors sufficient space to provide comprehensive proposals.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RFIs

FA441725Q0321

Local & Long-Distance Telephone Services

1. I see a lot of equipment on the SOW. Does that currently exist? Yes, all equipment in diagram 2 on page 7 of the SOW exists except for the items listed “future commercial” which consists of a “Vendor Supplied Cisco ISR4451” which is End of Life (EOL) End of Support (EOS). We would expect the vendor to supply a router that is not EOL/EOS.

2. Who manages the Cisco equipment? The USAF. Do they need any Cisco networking help? Yes, we will likely need assistance.

3. Who is the incumbent service provider? Lumen/CenturyLink.

4. Please confirm ethernet handoff, electrical or optical? Please refer to diagram 2 on Page 7 of the SOW.

The circuits between the Vendor Supplied Router and the USAF supplied media gateway will be a PRI circuits. The PRI circuit is meant to separate the two networks and to eliminate a backdoor into the USAF network.

5. For fiber quote, will 24 months be acceptable? Do not understand the question.

6. Is there any historical usage for this account in terms of total LTS minutes/month? Please see following pages for supporting information.

7. What is the average number of monthly long-distance minutes? Please see following pages for supporting information.

8. Is there a common carrier demarc on base where base fiber can be utilized to reach these two locations?

No.

9. Is the requirement for the vendor to provide SIP trunk handoff via ethernet into the Government provided gateways, or is the Government requiring a PRI handoff at each location, and with the desired call paths that would be 5 PRIs at each location? Yes, 5 PRIs at each location 103 CCLs at 91023 and 104 CCLs at 90624.

10. Does the government require carrier diversity in addition to the route diversity? Carrier Diversity is not required. Route diversity is required.

11. To clarify, Does the Government route any 911 calls to the on base PSAP in building 91023 via the UC IP network, or will the vendor receive 911 calls through the SIP trunk that then need to be routed back through to the PSAP with e911. Yes, all 911 calls will be routed through the UC IP network. The 911 calls will not be routed through the SIP trunk provided by the vendor.

12. We request an extension to the quote due date by two weeks from the release of questions & answers to provide sufficient time for offerors to provide a complete, compelling, and compliant offer. The quote due date will remain as stated in the solicitation. If an extension is made at a later time, an amendment will be made. Please stay current on the most up to date amendments made.

13. We request the technical response page limit be increased to 15 pages; 10 pages will restricts offerors' ability to provide a complete and compliant technical proposal. The page limit for the technical response will be increased to 15 pages.

Gateway Call Summary

From Date:Sep 1, 2025 Sep 25, 2025

To Date:Sep 25, 2025

Report Generation Criteria-

Call Classification: Long Distance, International, Incoming

Time Period: 1 Sep – 25 Sep 2025

Incoming Calls Total Duration (seconds) Total Duration (minutes)

4,067 480,293 8,005

Long Distance Calls Total Duration (seconds) Total Duration (minutes)

1,989 310,019 5,167

Traffic Summary - Hour of Day Date:Sep 24, 2025

Page:1 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Local

00-01 0

01-02 0

02-03 0

03-04 0

04-05 0

05-06 0

06-07 2

07-08 7

08-09 19

09-10 25

10-11 25

11-12 18

12-13 17

13-14 22

14-15 21

Page:2 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Local

15-16 13

16-17 4

17-18 1

18-19 1

19-20 1

20-21 1

21-22 0

22-23 0

23-00 1

Page:3 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Local

Page:4 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Long Distance

00-01 2

01-02 2

02-03 1

03-04 1

04-05 2

05-06 3

06-07 13

07-08 57

08-09 133

09-10 157

10-11 154

11-12 130

12-13 125

13-14 147

14-15 135

15-16 108

16-17 43

17-18 14

Page:5 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Long Distance

18-19 8

19-20 6

20-21 6

21-22 4

22-23 3

23-00 4

Long Distance

Page:6 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Total

00-01 2

01-02 2

02-03 1

03-04 1

04-05 2

05-06 3

06-07 15

07-08 64

08-09 152

09-10 182

10-11 179

11-12 148

12-13 142

13-14 169

14-15 156

15-16 121

16-17 47

17-18 15

Page:7 of 7

BHCC:182Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Aug 31, 2025 From Date:Aug 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Total

18-19 9

19-20 7

20-21 7

21-22 4

22-23 3

23-00 5

Total

Traffic Summary - Hour of Day

Page:1 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Local

00-01 0

01-02 0

02-03 0

03-04 0

04-05 0

05-06 0

06-07 2

07-08 8

08-09 19

09-10 26

10-11 24

11-12 19

12-13 19

13-14 23

14-15 21

Page:2 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Local

15-16 12

16-17 3

17-18 1

18-19 1

19-20 1

20-21 1

21-22 0

22-23 0

23-00 1

Page:3 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Local

Page:4 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Long Distance

00-01 2

01-02 2

02-03 1

03-04 2

04-05 2

05-06 4

06-07 13

07-08 67

08-09 150

09-10 183

10-11 177

11-12 141

12-13 138

13-14 169

14-15 151

15-16 115

16-17 47

17-18 14

Page:5 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Long Distance

18-19 7

19-20 4

20-21 3

21-22 3

22-23 4

23-00 3

Long Distance

Page:6 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Total

00-01 2

01-02 2

02-03 1

03-04 2

04-05 2

05-06 4

06-07 15

07-08 75

08-09 169

09-10 209

10-11 201

11-12 160

12-13 157

13-14 192

14-15 172

15-16 127

16-17 50

17-18 15

Page:7 of 7

BHCC:209Report Generation Criteria- Call Classification: Local, Long Distance QoS: Good, Acceptable, Fair, Poor, NA

To Date:Sep 24, 2025 From Date:Sep 1, 2025

Time Average Number Of Calls

Total

18-19 8

19-20 5

20-21 4

21-22 3

22-23 4

23-00 4

Total

RFIs - FA441725Q0321
Gateway Call Summary
Aug 2025 Local & Long Distance Summary
Sep 2025 Local & Long Distance Summary

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .