SOF CAPA Heat Map.pdf

Predictive Heat Map

Wi-Fi Network Report for

ES103

This desktop wireless design was developed based on information provided by the customer with access points and air monitors placed per the customer’s coverage area(s) and BITI design requirements. Some assumptions were made such as wall types and as such heat map depictions are reflective of those assumptions.

NOTE: Final design and placement of devices is subject to the integrators discretion and recommendations.

Ramp

Access Points on Ramp

Signal Strength for Ramp

Signal Strength - sometimes called coverage - is the most basic requirement for a wireless network. As a general guideline, low signal strength means unreliable connections, and low data throughput.

2.4 GHz

5 GHZ

Access Points Summary

ES103 - Ramp Name AP Model Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-377

Total APs for ES103 - Ramp =

Air Monitors on Ramp

IDS/IPS (Air Monitor) Signal Strength for Ramp

Air Monitor Summary

ES103 - Ramp Name Model Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-377

Total AMs for ES103 - Ramp =

AP and AM Total

ES103

Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-377

Total APs for ES103 =

Caveats

• This design is a prediction only; no formal visit was performed to determine additional interferers.

• Inner wall construction was estimated as thicker walls being all concrete and smaller walls were assigned as drywall.

• This plan is for coverage and not capacity. There are many ways to plan a deployment, capacity, coverage and speed. In this case Aruba predicted for at least -75dBm in all areas.

• Additional interferers that may cause issues could be, additional walls not show in drawings, additional furniture not shown in drawings (minimal unless it’s large i.e. large metal filling cabinets), microwave ovens, plants, water pipes in the walls, wall mounted TVs in each room, etc…

• Microwave ovens, wireless capable TVs or projectors, wireless handsets, water pipes, trees and plants can all be interferers to the WLAN should these be identified this projection can be re-run.

• If the wall construction assumptions were incorrect, this prediction can be re-run with the appropriate values.

• It may be worth a full ACTIVE site survey once the deployment is completed to get a more accurate projection of coverage and define if there are additional APs required.

ES105

design requirements. Some assumptions were made such as wall types and as such heat map depictions are reflective of those assumptions.

Ramp

Access Points on Ramp

ES105 - Ramp

Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-377

Total APs for ES105 - Ramp =

Air Monitors on Ramp

IDS/IPS (Air Monitor) Signal Strength for Ramp

ES105 - Ramp

Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-377

Total AMs for ES105 - Ramp =

ES105

Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-377

Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-377

Total APs for ES105 =

• Inner wall construction was estimated as thicker walls being all concrete and smaller walls were assigned as drywall.

• This plan is for coverage and not capacity. There are many ways to plan a deployment, capacity, coverage and speed. In this case Aruba predicted for at least -75dBm in all areas.

• Additional interferers that may cause issues could be, additional walls not show in drawings, additional furniture not shown in drawings (minimal unless it’s large i.e. large metal filling cabinets), microwave ovens, plants, water pipes in the walls, wall mounted TVs in each room, etc…

• Microwave ovens, wireless capable TVs or projectors, wireless handsets, water pipes, trees and plants can all be interferers to the WLAN should these be identified this projection can be re-run.

• If the wall construction assumptions were incorrect, this prediction can be re-run with the appropriate values.

Building TN101 design requirements. Some assumptions were made such as wall types and as such heat map depictions are reflective of those assumptions.

Floor 1

Access Points on Floor 1

Signal Strength for Floor 1

Signal Strength for Floor 1

Building TN101 - Floor 1

Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-225

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-225

Total APs for Building TN101 - Floor 1 =

Air Monitors on Floor 1

IDS/IPS (Air Monitor) Signal Strength for Floor 1

Building TN101 - Floor 1

Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-225

Total AMs for Building TN101 - Floor 1 =

Building TN101 Simulated AP-1 Aruba AP-225

Simulated AP-2 Aruba AP-225

Simulated AP-3 Aruba AP-225

Total APs for Building TN101 =

• Inner wall construction was estimated as thicker walls being all concrete and smaller walls were assigned as drywall.

• This plan is for coverage and not capacity. There are many ways to plan a deployment, capacity, coverage and speed. In this case Aruba predicted for at least -75dBm in all areas.

• Additional interferers that may cause issues could be, additional walls not show in drawings, additional furniture not shown in drawings (minimal unless it’s large i.e. large metal filling cabinets), microwave ovens, plants, water pipes in the walls, wall mounted TVs in each room, etc…

• Microwave ovens, wireless capable TVs or projectors, wireless handsets, water pipes, trees and plants can all be interferers to the WLAN should these be identified this projection can be re-run.

• If the wall construction assumptions were incorrect, this prediction can be re-run with the appropriate values.