FA441721B0001 - Questions and Answers.pdf
PDF 203 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Convert Mini-Mall to Admin Facility, Bldg. 90228
- Solicitation number
- FA441721B0001
About this file
This document contains questions and answers regarding Solicitation Number FA441721B0001 from the Department of the Air Force Special Operations Command. The solicitation is for the conversion of a mini-mall to an administrative facility at Building 90228. Questions addressed pricing terms, the existing fire alarm system manufacturer and model, responsibilities for installing cabling infrastructure, submission requirements, and whether the superintendent could also serve as the Site Safety and Health Officer and Quality Control manager. The intent is for the contractor to provide and install raceways and boxes while the government will furnish and install cabling. No contract clause for cost escalation was incorporated. Commissioning is not required as part of this contract. Existing slat walls not indicated for removal are to be left in place.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOLICITATION NO. FA441721B0001
Convert Mini-Mall to Admin Facility, Bldg. 90228
QUESTIONS & ANSWERS
28 June 2021
Question 1: Specs/plans note add to existing FA system, what is existing FA manufacture
/model?
Answer: Fire Control Instruments, FC-72 Series panel
Question 2: On sheet T-102 it states “Base Comm will install Cabling system prior to epoxy application”; will Base comm also be furnishing the cabling system or are we to include the cabling system in addition to the raceways and boxes in our bid price?
Answer: The cabling will be provided and installed by the Government. Contractor is required to provide and install the raceways and boxes.
Question 3: Is there any way that the proposal could be sent via email? It would make it much easier for contractors out of state and also would provide better prices considering all those Subs that send their numbers in the last minute that we cannot use if we already mailed our bid. We would highly appreciate you guys allowing email submission.
Answer: Unfortunately, due to the nature of the invitation for bid (IFB) and the approach that has been approved, we will only accept proposals via hand-carry and mail as outlined in
Section L of the Solicitation.
Question 4: Can superintendent perform SSHO & QC duties in addition to superintendent duties?
Answer: Yes
Question 5: FAR Clause for cost escalation
Answer: No clause has been incorporated for escalation.
Question 6: Is commissioning part of this contract or will owner be performing this part?
Answer: No commissioning required.
Question 7: There are some existing “slat walls” that do not show to be removed, for instance barbershop/shoe repair, is this the intent?
Answer: The intent is to leave the slat walls were it is not indicated to be removed.
-END QUESTIONS & ANSWERS -
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .