Atch_21_-_RFI_Log_B861_-_27_July_18.pdf

RFI No. Question / Comment SME Response Publish

Action

R0001

The SF1442 & Proposal Checklist has conflicting due dates and RFI submission dates.

Revised Propsal checklist to match the dates of the SF1442 26‐Jun‐18

R0002

There are several references to SBA 8(a) certification in the documents, though FBO lists the project as a Total Small Business Set‐

Aside. Can you please clarify if this solicitation is intended to be an 8(a) Set‐Aside, or if it is Total Small Business?

This is a Total Small Business Set‐Aside 27‐Jun‐18

R0003

SF 1442 Section 13.A states the proposal is due at 1:00 PM July 25, 2018. Attachment 20‐

Proposal Checklist originally stated the proposal is due at 1:00 PM July 29, 2018 (this is a Sunday). Amendment 2 revised the proposal checklist and omitted the proposal due information. Please clarify what the proposal due date is.

The proposals are due at 1:00 PM July 25, 2018. 5‐Jul‐18

R0004

Are CAD files available for the building? If so, could you please provide so that they can be utilized for our technical proposal?

Yes, CAD files are available 9‐Jul‐18

R0005

Please clarify as to whether the

Superintendent can also perform the duties of the SSHO.

Please refer to FAR 52.236‐6 ‐‐ Superintendence by the

Contractor 9‐Jul‐18

R0006

Please clarify as to whether the

Superintendent can also perform the duties of the Quality Control Manager or if a QC

Manager is required with no other duties.

Please refer to FAR 52.246‐12‐‐ Inspection of Contarction 9‐Jul‐18

R0007 Please clarify as to whether this project sales tax exempt?

Yes, this is sales tax exempt 9‐Jul‐18

R0008

Attachment 20 – Proposal Checklist states that Blocks 30A, 30B and 30C should be filled out for the proposal. Should these blocks be filled out for the proposal or by the successful offeror at award, please clarify.

These are to be filled in, signed and dated when submitting your proposal.

Also, must check block 28.

9‐Jul‐18

R0009 Will the past performance questionnaires be due at the site meeting or with the bid

Past Performance Questionnaires will be due with the proposal 9‐Jul‐18

R0010

Paragraph 2 for the Pre‐Phase Section in the

Scope of Work states the contractor needs to perform an analysis of the exterior walls to determine the extent of termite damage.

There is already such a report in the bid package complied by KDG. Is the contractor expected to do a second analysis as a part of their scope?

The report provided identifies the areas that have termite damage and an idea of the severity but the overall scope of the damage is somewhat unknown. Per the “Proposed

Solution Report” section, page 2 “Exterior Façade Repairs” –

“Remove the existing faux brick, sheathing, batt insulation, all damaged sill plates and wood stud wall framing on framing on all exterior walls.” The contractor does NOT need to do a second analysis but should bid according to the information provided in the report.

11‐Jul‐18

Request for Information (RFI) Subject Matter Expert (SME)

R0011

Section Detail 4, Sheet A4‐1 calls for the contractor to assume that 25% of the exterior wall studs will be replaced due to termite damage. However the individual removal sheets designated certain areas where this applies (Keyed Note 9.2). Which applies, the entire perimeter or just the designated sections?

Assume 25% replacement of the entire perimeter wall studs. 11‐Jul‐18

R0012 What code is to be used on the project 2015 or 2018 IBC?

2015 11‐Jul‐18

R0013

On page A3‐1 of the solicitation key note states “For bidding purposes contractor shall assume in base bid replacement of approximately 25% of all exterior 2X6 wall studs due to existing damage as required”.

Shall the design and construction assume all interior finishes in affected rooms be replaced with like kind finishes?

yes 11‐Jul‐18

R0014

How is the contractor to address the code required threshold for full building refit for seismic if reached?

B861 is a one‐story structure, no seismic work required. Please provide which code you are concerned about.

24‐Jul‐18

R0015

Per the termite damage/ structural integrity assessment it appears that windows and door openings are compromised. If an exterior window or door must be fully removed this would trigger under UFC 4‐010‐01, AT/FP compliant windows and doors with supporting structural frame work to meet the criteria.

Confirm how may openings of each window and door conditions are to be anticipated in the base bid.

Per the “Proposed Solution Report” section, page 2 “Exterior

Façade Repairs” – “Removal of the existing windows or doors will be determined by the extent of damage to the window or door opening framing.” Without extensive demolition the exact number of windows and doors to be replaced in unknown. For bidding purposes assume 3 single doors, 5 double doors and 20 windows.

11‐Jul‐18

R0016 What is the Seismic Site Class for this building location?

Not applicable 26‐Jul‐18

R0017 What is the Seismic Risk Category for the building?

Comment: Seismic Site Class and Seismic Risk Category, along with location, will dictate Seismic Design Category. This in turn will dictate per IEBC whether the project is excepted from seismic evaluation and repair. Reference IEBC 606.2.2, exception 1.

11‐Jul‐18

R0018

If the project is subject to seismic evaluation and repair per IEBC 606.2.2, will this requirement be waived?

This project is not subject to IEBC. 26‐Jul‐18

R0019 Identify light fixtures in room 402A

Fixture shall be Type D as indicated in the Lighting Fixture

Schedule, Sheet E‐7 and not the 2X4 drawn on the plans on

Sheet E‐4.

26‐Jul‐18

R0020 Confirm the number of independent supports required for light fixtures

Follow the specifications on this one: fixtures shall be independently supported from the building structure by a minimum of four wires or rods per fixture (26 51 00 ‐ Page 6).

26‐Jul‐18

R0021 Please confirm that separate neutrals are required for multi‐wired branch circuits

Follow the specs on this one: separate neutrals are required.

Shared neutral, or multi‐wire branch circuits are not permitted

(26 20 00 Page 19). Homeruns on the plans indicating otherwise, shall be updated accordingly.

26‐Jul‐18

R0022

Should items 5 thru 9 of the Attachment 1

Scope of Work all fall under Item 4 –

Design/Build Scope…i.e. – should these item be Items d thru f under Item 4?

Items 5 thru 9 are under design/build scope of work 26‐Jul‐18

R0023

Item 6 of the Attachment 1 Scope of Work references a “Post Investigative Report”. We are unable to locate this report. Could you please clarify whether this report is part of the

RFP?

Yes the report is part of the RFP. Attachment 24 Post

Investigation Report has been added in Amendment 4.

26‐Jul‐18

R0024

Attachment 8 Termite Treatment Report states that the exterior façade should be removed down to the studs and a new façade system is recommended in the report. Please clarify whether we are to include the new façade system per this report? If so, also please clarify whether the mansard and gutters should also be removed and replaced?

Yes, include the new façade system per Attachment 8. The mansard and gutter should only be removed and replaced if the termite damage is that extensive.

26‐Jul‐18

R0025

Please clarify who is to determine what studs are to be replaced, the Government’s engineer or the Contractor’s engineer?

Contractors engineer 26‐Jul‐18

R0026

Should any amount of window or door framing replacement be included in our proposal?

25% like rest of the building 26‐Jul‐18

R0027

Attachment 8 Termite Treatment Report states that the mulch that is around the building is to be replaced with landscaping rock. We saw very little mulch around the building. Is the intent that the Government would like landscaping rock around the building? If so, the report also states that the landscaping rock be 8” below finish floor. If this is required, a hole will be being created by the foundation of the building because of the existing grades. Are we to include new storm drains in the landscaping rock beds to remove the storm water?

Remove mulch, bring to grade and replace with grass seed. 26‐Jul‐18

R0028

Could you please provide the unit cost we are to use for building replacement cost? If this renovation exceeds 50% of the replacement cost, are we to include new blast rated doors and windows per the ATFP UFC?

Not applicable 26‐Jul‐18

R0029

Please clarify what we should include in our proposal for termite repair cost on the west side of the building that is not referencing replacing 25% of the studs.

The 25% of the studs is for the enitre facility not an individual area.

26‐Jul‐18

R0030

The same material that was tested on top of the light fixture that came back as asbestos is on top of all of the platforms, conduits and beams in the attic. Will all of the material in the attic require abatement cleaning?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0031

The building has a termite report that indicates to anticipate 25% of the exterior stud wall needs to be replaced. Although there is no way to accurately determine the extent and location.

This sounds like a statement not a question. But yes we are assuming 25% replacement had to make a assumption on some number in order for contrators to bid evenly.

26‐Jul‐18

R0032

The building is a primary gathering place based on the quantity of people, and the UFC

4‐010‐01 guidance would indicate that for a

EIFS sheathed stud wall construction, the conventional construction standoff is 86’ to parking and roadways within a secured base.

Per UFC 4‐010‐01, 86 ft standoff is only applicable to new construction. This is an extisting structure.

26‐Jul‐18

R0033 Parking is within 30’ of the building. Will the exterior walls need to be blast designed.

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0034

If the ATFP requirements are mandatory, are the existing windows ATFP compliant or would they need to be replaced with compliant windows.

N/A 26‐Jul‐18

R0035 The building has secure spaces within, including what I thought I saw as SCIF spaces.

No scif 26‐Jul‐18

R0036

If the building is to be occupied during construction how is the contractor to maintain security and a sound protective envelope while replacing the wall envelope in part or in whole?

wall of with plywood 26‐Jul‐18

R0037 If the SCIF spaces have their walls stripped off the SCIF would likely have to be recertified.

No scif 26‐Jul‐18

R0038

The exterior walls of the spaces contain utilities either within the wall or on the surface. Are those utilities part of the wall replacement effort?

The utilities are to remain contractor is to work around utilites or make necessary minor modifications if needed.

26‐Jul‐18

R0039

The exterior wall of the buildings appear to run from the sill plate at the ground floor to the original roof rafters. If those studs need to be fully replace will that require both exterior wall and mansard roof replacement?

Replace studs with minimal disruption to the mansard and exterior wall.

26‐Jul‐18

R0040 Has the building been treated to exterminate the termite infestation?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0041

L‐2.2.2.1 Past Performance Information

Sheets states “…for contracts or orders performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers within the past three

(3) years from the solicitation date…” however

M‐4.2.1 Recency states “…offerors must submit three (3) project references that have been awarded, completed, or are ongoing within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation…”. Please clarify whether the requirement for Past Performance projects is

3 years or 5 years.

The requirement for Past Performance projects is 5 years.

Section L‐2.2.2.1. has been updated.

R0042

M‐4.1.4 states “To receive an Acceptable rating the offeror’s summary schedule shall demonstrate each phase and major milestone or critical element of design and construction with corresponding completion in calendar days.” Please clarify whether a schedule is required for inclusion within Volume II – Work

Plan – Organizational and Technical Approach.

No, a formal schedule is not required. The government requirement is for offeror’s to provide a summary of each phase and major milestone or critical element of design and construction with corresponding completion in number of calendar days

26‐Jul‐18

R0043

Reference is made to SOW, paragraph 2), final sentence. Does the removal and replacement of all furniture and associated power and com connections only apply to the design portion of the project or does it apply to the entire project, all eight wings?

Entire project 26‐Jul‐18

R0044

Reference is made to SOW paragraph 2), ‐ sentence beginning – “The Design‐Build portion is to renovate . . . Clarification is sought regarding the end of the sentence

“and correct the remaining termite damage not covered in the 100% design.” The 100% design addressed removal of the existing drywall on the interior side of the exterior walls and replacement of up to 25% of the existing studs. Is the design of termite repair limited to the existing exterior walls not covered by note 9.2 on plan sheets A2‐1 and

A2‐2?

For termite repair, use the termite report (Attachment 8) for locations of work.

26‐Jul‐18

R0045 Per UFC 3‐600‐01, Change 2; is this considered a major project?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0046

If this is considered a major project, will all design drawings need to be reviewed by a

QFPE?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0047 If this is considered a major project, will 100% drawings need to be stamped by a QFPE?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0048

If this is considered a major project, will the contractor need to provide a Life Safety

Analysis reviewed and stamped by a QFPE?

Yes, please review UFC 3‐600‐01 for Major Project requirements.

26‐Jul‐18

R0049

If this is considered a major project, will the contractor need to provide QFPE review of any of the 100% designed portion of work provided by the Government?

QFPE will review all plans and stamp accordingly. Please review UFC 3‐600‐01 for Major Project requirements.

26‐Jul‐18

R0050

Reference is made to the SOW, page 6 of 12, paragraph 5). Are the Fire Alarm

Requirements outlined in this paragraph part of the design‐build scope?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0051

Does Attachment 8, Termite Treatment

Report, only apply to areas not covered by the

100% designed scope?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0052

Reference is made to SOW page 2 of 12, paragraph 3) c. Pre‐Phase: item 2. Is the required report limited to the Bid‐Build portion of the project?

phasing applies to entire project 26‐Jul‐18

R0053

Reference is made to SOW, page 7 of 12, paragraph 6) Termite Treatment and Repair:

item a., which reads in part; “to aid in the development of a treatment and repair plan.”

Is the intent of the project to do all termite repair work as described and in the 100% stamped documents and in addition just prepare a treatment and repair plan based on the information determined by the survey as discussed at SOW paragraph 3) c. Pre‐Phase

2.?

For termite repair, use the termite report (Attachment 8) for locations of work.

26‐Jul‐18

R0054

Reference is made to SOW paragraph 2), ‐ sentence beginning – “The Design‐Build portion is to renovate . . . Clarification is sought regarding the end of the sentence

“and correct the remaining termite damage not covered in the 100% design.” For bidding purposes, how is the contractor to determine costs associated with the repair of termite/water damage when the extent of the damage will not be determined until after contract award?

Prepare your bid in accordance with Attachment 8, Proposed

Solution Report. Assuming 25% of exterior walls need replacing (i.e. ‐ the entire wall system)

26‐Jul‐18

R0055

The RFP documents include Attachment 6, Fire Systems Drawings. The SOW, page 4 of

12, Fire Suppression Requirements references

Attached Drawings. Are these the drawings in

Attachment 6?

yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0056

Reference is made to SOW paragraph 2), final sentence. For bidding purposes, how should the contractor determine how much furniture will need to be moved and electrical and communications lines disconnected and reconnected to accommodate termite/water damage repair when the extent of damage will not be known at time of bid?

Prepare your bid in accordance with Attachment 8, Proposed

Solution Report. Assuming 25% of exterior walls need replacing (i.e. ‐ furniture along the exterior walls)

26‐Jul‐18

R0057

Reference is made to the SOW, pages 2 through 3, Phase descriptions. The first sentence of Phases 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 contains

“(as shown on attached drawings)”. Is the attached drawing being referenced the

Phasing Plan, Attachment 2?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0058

Reference is made to plan sheets AD‐1 and AD‐

2, keyed note 2.3. Note 2.3 directs the contractor to “REMOVE GYPSUM BOARD

SHEATHING, TRIM, AND BASE ON INTERIOR

SIDE OF EXTERIOR WALLS” and is applied at all exterior walls. Plan sheets A2‐1 and A2‐2, note 9.2 reads “PATCH EXTERIOR WALLS AS

REQUIRED TO MATCH EXISTING FINISHES. . .”

This appears to be an ambiguity. Does the

Government desire all drywall to be removed and replaced? Should replaced drywall be painted?

Only remove and replace drywall as necessary to repair areas affected by construction. Yes it should be painted.

R0059 Please provide a room finish schedule. All rooms will be finished with like finishes. 26‐Jul‐18

R0060

Reference is made to plan Sheet A2.3. Are the referenced 115SJ16 Metal Joists and bridging existing?

hatched area indicates extent of work including new metal joists and bridging.

26‐Jul‐18

R0061

Reference is made to section cut 2 on plan sheet A3.1. Does this cut represent existing conditions?

Detail 1 is existing and indicates some demolition. Detial 2 shows new work.

26‐Jul‐18

R0062 Where is section cut 2 on plan sheet A3.1 applicable?

Typical at all wings where work is indicated. 26‐Jul‐18

R0063

Reference is made to Section cut 2 on plan sheet A3.1. The cut references and enlarged section detail, 4/A3.1. We are unable to locate section detail 4 on plan sheet A3.1, please provide same.

4/A3.1 reference is to be 2/A4.1 26‐Jul‐18

R0064

Reference is made to Section Details 1 and 2 on plan sheet A4.1. Where are these details applied?

2/A4.1 is feferenced on s/A3.1 (RFI#63 response), 1/A4.1 is cut perpendicular through 2/A4.1 26‐Jul‐18

R0065

Reference is made to Keyed Note 9.1 on plan pages A2‐1, A2‐2, A6‐1 and A6‐2. Where is this Keyed Note applied?

9.1 is applied where scope of work is defined, see hatched area and General notes #3 26‐Jul‐18

R0066

Does all existing exterior thin brick wall system get removed and replaced with gypsum sheathing and polyurethane faux brick system per Attachment 8?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0067

Reference is made to Keyed note 2.3 on plan sheets AD‐1 and AD‐2 directing removal of existing gyp wall board on interior side of perimeter walls. Per the asbestos survey and specification section 020610, the drywall system is considered asbestos containing material, ACM, and will need to be abated.

The existing building wall cuts show insulation in the stud cavities. The insulation will be contaminated by the abatement. Does the

Government want the existing insulation removed and disposed of as ACM?

Dispose of as asbestos containing material. 26‐Jul‐18

R0068

Reference is made to the asbestos survey results, item #10A and Asbestos Specification

Section 020610, paragraph 1.1, the third bullet point directing abatement of 26,449 SF of acoustical ceiling tile and fiberglass insulation. Does the Government want the contractor to follow standard protocol and provide a complete cleaning of all attic surfaces since the debris identified as ACM is loose and friable?

Yes. Per our survey report, "the lab analyst reported that the sample contained a tar binding material, which ATC believes that an asbestos‐containing roofing material may have existed and been removed in the past and the fine debris sifted through the roof deck and onto the attic and ceiling tiles below". ATC recommends that any asbestos debris removal/cleanup include the attic space above the suspended ceilings.

26‐Jul‐18

R0069

General Notes G and H on Sheet E‐1 note we shall modify any circuitry to continue operation of that circuit that could be affected by relocation, removal, or demolition. There is no way to quantify this work prior to construction. Can an allowance be carried for this work and addressed at the time of occurrence?

No allowance, will be addressed on a case by case basis. 26‐Jul‐18

R0070

Key Note 4 on Sheets E‐1 and E‐2 notes to disconnect surface mounted devices on walls scheduled to receive new finishes. Does the arrow showing these locations indicate just those specific devices, the entire room or just that wall?

The arrows show either the entire wall or the entire room.

Please ensure that existing devices or raceways are removed and temporarily supported prior to new wall finishes and reinstalled after new wall finishes.

26‐Jul‐18

R0071

In the fire alarm requirements on Page 6 of the SOW we are told to remove the existing

Notifier 500 TR fire alarm panel, and an estimated 92 smoke detectors and 5 heat detectors, and associated wiring, and install a mass notification system. We are also instructed to install fire alarm notification only in Rooms 355A, 355B, 355D, 355E, and 16. Are we to update the entire building to a new fire alarm/mass notification system the meets the requirements of the NFPA and UFC noted in the bid documents?

Ensure the entire facility is equipped with a Mass Notification System / Fire

Alarm System IAW

UFC and NFPA requirements.

26‐Jul‐18

R0072

Room 402A has two 2 x 4 fixtures identified as a Type D. A Type D fixture is a recess can light.

What type light fixtures are these?

Recessed can light. Please see RFI# 19 above. 26‐Jul‐18

R0073

Will the AF accept the Sentricon Termite Bait

System, as a method for termite treatment?

Sentricon has been used to protect buildings on military bases across the country.

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0074

SOW Item 3), Pre‐Phase .2 requires a Termite

Damage Survey be conducted within 30 days of NTP. Due to the existence of ACM drywall an interior investigation cannot be conducted until the ACM abatement has been completed. Due to the presence of existing wall insulation and fire blocking a camera investigation cannot be conducted by entering the wall cavity from the exterior. Contractor suggests inspection be completed post ACM abatement when the wall cavities are fully visible. Please advise.

Yes, all ACM as identified in the study attached to the RFP should be completed prior to other work. We will make this change in the SOW.

26‐Jul‐18

R0075 Please confirm providing new furniture is in the scope of work.

Providing swing space furniture for B56 and B531. 26‐Jul‐18

R0076 If furniture is included, are the only locations in B531 and B56?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0077

Please confirm the size, quantity and any required features or characteristics of each furniture item.

Quantity is included in the SOW. Each desk/cubicle will be powered and provided with comm ability. Size of each desk is determined by the allowed space and the quantity of desks.

26‐Jul‐18

R0078

Is there a furniture basis of design

(manufacturer make and model #) or can a furniture layout and specifications be provided?

Reference SOW pre‐phase section for design basis.

Manufacturer, make, and model # is contractor discretion.

26‐Jul‐18

R0079 Please clarify the extent of gypsum lid removal above the ACT.

If removal of the ACT damages the gypsum it should be replaced. Damage will be addressed on an as needed basis

R0080

In the scope of work it states that the project period of performance is 365 days. Is this for both the bid‐build and design‐build portion of this project?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0081

What is the period of performance for each the bid‐build and design‐build? Or is that decided by the contractor as long as both combined are not more than 365 days?

365 days total 26‐Jul‐18

R0082 Can we perform the bid‐build work while the design‐build is in the design phase?

Yes, per the phasing plan and as work allows 26‐Jul‐18

R0083 Will additional performance time be given if the options are to be part of the contract?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0084

Attachment 8 “Termite Treatment Report”, appendix C: There are missing photographs of access point 2, 3, 4, 12, 13, 14, 20, 21, 27, 28, 29, and 32. Can these be provided?

No photographs due to being a secure space, please see the report for information about those access points.

26‐Jul‐18

R0085

Attachment 8 “Termite Treatment Report”, It states that the building structure is a traditional post and beam framing system that utilizes heavy timber truss fabrications supported on timber columns to support roof loads and transfer these loads into the foundation. Question is has any of the heavy timber trusses or timber columns been inspected for termite damage?

Refer to the report 26‐Jul‐18

R0086

How can we determine the amount & cost to replace the heavy timber trusses if they have termite damage?

Based on the report findings, there was no observable damage to these systems 26‐Jul‐18

R0087 Are there current as‐built drawings showing which interior walls are wood verse metal?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0088 Are we to replace interior wood walls that have termite damage?

If needing replacement, then yes, we will replace them. But currently no interior walls are identified as needing replacement.

26‐Jul‐18

R0089

Are there as‐built drawings showing the extent of the landscaping beds with wood chips?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0090

Addendum 3, Attachment 21, RFI log B861

July 11, R0011 states to assume 25% replacement of the entire perimeter wall studs. Will there be a change order if more then 25% replacement of perimeter wall studs is required?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0091

Addendum 3, Attachment 21, RFI log B861

July 11, R0015 states to assume 3 single doors, 5 double doors, and 20 windows to be replaced due to termite damage. Will there be a change order if more doors or windows are discovered to have termite damage?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0092

SOW Page 9 Par. 12.1.f.‐ What is SAFB expectation for as‐built drawings on the Bid‐

Build portion regarding the seals, signatures and stamps? An option would be current sealed drawing “as built information” provided by contractor will be placed on new project title block sheets and only sealed for any changes as built.

Provide new project title block sheets and only sealed for any changes as‐built.

26‐Jul‐18

R0093

Shall we provide a fee for incorporating contractor’s as built markups into AutoCAD for the Bid‐Build portion?

If the "as‐builts" in this question are referring to the 100% designs, then changes should be noted on the final post construction as‐builts with no additional fee.

26‐Jul‐18

R0094

What is the required format for the project specifications: MasterFormat, SpecsIntact or

Sheet specifications included in drawings?

CSI MasterSpec Format 26‐Jul‐18

R0095

SOW Page 4 Par. 4.b.7. ; Is the recirculation pump to be replaced or just the water piping to it?

Replace pump and associated piping. 26‐Jul‐18

R0096

Please confirm that the design associated with item 7 refers only to East restroom. The Bid‐

Build plans show the demo and new work for the West restroom.

Confirmed East Restroom is in item 7. West RR fixtures have been updated recently.

26‐Jul‐18

R0097

SOW Page 4 Par 4.b.; Items 14 & 15 seem to contradict the scope of items 1,2,4, and 13.

Please clarify.

They contradict and we will edit the SOW. 26‐Jul‐18

R0098 Is the project budget determined? That information is not releasable 26‐Jul‐18

R0099

Are building as built AutoCAD drawing files available to be used as backgrounds for

Design Build documents?

Yes, however contractor is responsible for verifying all existing conditions. Please reference Amendment 3 on how to acquire

AutoCAD Drawings.

26‐Jul‐18

R0100

Are the sealed Bid‐Build documents available in AutoCAD format to be used in the Design

Build effort?

Yes, however contractor is responsible for verifying all existing conditions. Please contact through email SSgt Jorge Alvarez and Mr. Jody Noram to acquire a copy.

26‐Jul‐18

R0101 SOW Page 7 Par. 7, 8, and 9; shall we prepare design fees for these Bid‐Build Options?

No, design is not required 26‐Jul‐18

R0102

SOW Page 7 Par 6; shall we prepare design fees for the contractor proposed approach where Bid Build drawings differ from the

“Proposed Solution Report”? If yes, what percentage of exterior wall?

No additional design fees should be required; if the approach changes from the "proposed solution report" we will address it at that time

26‐Jul‐18

R0103

Will you provide CAD drawings as stated in

Addendum 3, Attachment 21, RFI log B861

July 11, R0004?

Yes, Please reference Amendment 3 on how to acquire

AutoCAD Drawings.

26‐Jul‐18

R0104 Please confirm providing new furniture is in the scope of work.

Yes, for the swing space in B56 & B531 26‐Jul‐18

R0105 If furniture is included, are the only locations in B531 and B56?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0106

Please confirm the size, quantity and any required features or characteristics of each furniture item.

Per SOW for numbers of desks; utilize most economical solution for systems furniture 26‐Jul‐18

R0107

Is there a furniture basis of design

(manufacturer make and model #) or can a furniture layout and specifications be provided?

Reference SOW pre‐phase section for design basis.

Manufacturer, make, and model # is contractor discretion.

26‐Jul‐18

R0108 What are the electrical and communication requirements for the furniture?

at a minimum 4 electrical/2 Comm ports 26‐Jul‐18

R0109

Is communication and electrical available for the workstations to be connected to at each location or will comm/power need to be run to the stations?

All spaces have electrical/communication capability;

contractor must ensure all furniture is move‐in ready 26‐Jul‐18

R0110

There is existing furniture/boxes ect. in building 531 and 56. Who is responsible for moving the existing and does it all get disposed of?

Government will remove existing items as needed. 26‐Jul‐18

R0111

Sprinkler drawing 1 of 4 has "Notes" in the lower right corner providing a description of work. Note #1.2 states "Replace all sprinkler heads associated with dry system #1 and wet system #2.

The sprinkler drawing in the

Atch_4_B861_100_Drawings.pdf, page 16 of

45 has outlined only a portion of the dry system to replace existing sprinkler heads.

The Statement of Work note 1 states, "Replace all sprinkler heads associated with

Dry System #1 (4") and Wet System #2". The sprinkler heads we saw at the job site visit this morning appear to be new. What is the scope of work for this project?

Refer to SOW and drawings provided for system sprinkler head locations. There are (3) dry systems in which (2) were recently installed. The fire suppression work identified in this SOW covers system 1 (Dry) and System 2

(Wet Stand Pipe). We are asking for head replacements and hydrostatic testing on both the dry and wet systems (from left to right riser numbers 1 & 2 of the

4 in place).

27‐Jul‐18

R0113

Refer to Section 23 09 23 & Sheet M‐16, HVAC

Temperature Controls:

Sheet M‐16 “AHU‐1 Existing Temperature

Control Diagram, Item 1. Existing JCI Controls shall be replaced with latest version controls and front end graphics shall be updated….”

It is assumed the intent is to have the exiting

JCI DX 9100 N2 Controllers replaced with New

JCI FEC & IOM BACnet DDC Controllers.

Assume this holds true for the DX 9100

Controller serving the Boiler and Chiller as well? Please confirm.

Drawing M-17, in Note 1 for both the Hot Water Flow Diagram and the Chilled Water Flow Diagram states:

1. All new controls.

2. New valves at Pumps and AHU Coils.

Drawing M-16 , in the DDC Network Notes states:

1. All DDC Temperature Control Panels, VAV Controllers & AHU Controllers shall be interconnected with “Communications Trunk” wiring.

2. “Communications Trunk” shall allow access to all DDC Points in System.

3. System installed in Project shall have capability to communicate with existing Building Controls System and to communicate with existing Base Johnson Metasys System via BACnet.

Specifications state:

1.4 BACNET DIRECT DIGITAL CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR HVAC

DESCRIPTION

a. Remove existing and provide new BACnet and modify existing and merge with existing BACnet DDC systems including associated equipment and accessories. Manufacturer's products, including design, materials, fabrication, assembly, inspection, and testing shall be in accordance with ASHRAE 135, ASME B31.1, and NFPA 70, except where indicated otherwise.

b. b. The existing Scott Air Force Base DDC system is manufactured by Johnson Controls, Inc. The existing Building 861 controls are a mixture of Johnson Controls, Inc. The server and operator workstation are existing.

Upgrade hardware, memory, and operating systems if required. This project adds modified controls for AHU-1 and associated VAV terminal units with hot water reheat coils. Additionally, controls of the building heating hot water boilers, heating hot water pumps, chilled water pump, control valves are project updated.

R0114 What Phase is the Corridor work to be included in?

Corridor work will be determined by the contractor to correlate with the wing phasing plan provided.

26‐Jul‐18

R0115

Sheet A2.1 Keyed Note 9.1 (5/8” Drywall @

Bottom of Trusses). This note is not shown on the plans. Please advise where this is to be located.

General Note #3 and plan on A0.1 for extent of ceiling work 26‐Jul‐18

R0116

If the faux brick is being removed what exterior finish will be installed back? Do you want a faux brick per the termite report or something different?

Per the termite report

R0117

Spec section 09 51 00.00 calls out a 24”x24” ceiling tile. Reflected ceiling plans show

24”x24” and 24”x48”. Will all ceilings be

24”x24” or do we bid per RCP A6.1

All ceiling tiles will be 24"x24" 26‐Jul‐18

R0118 Will work in area A1 and A2 be done at night?

Yes, work will be done in accordance to SOW paragraph 3.e unless extensive termite damage is done, then we will have to move them out and work will be done during the day.

R0119

The faux brick extends under the metal wall panels. If the brick is required to be removed are we to remove it up to the metal panels or do we remove the metal panels as well?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0120

A7.1 has the toilet accessories schedule and the Soap Dispenser and Paper Towel

Dispenser has “confirm” listed. Are these going to be owner furnished owner installed?

KTR to install all. 26‐Jul‐18

R0121 Can a spec be provided for the “Glass Door” for option 2?

Glass door to be designed like existing in A1 enterance of bldg. 26‐Jul‐18

R0122

There is a two week shut down between phases per the SOW. Can this transition period be reduced to one week or less per phase? Currently the is a 365 cal. day (52 weeks) contract period and we would be losing 12 weeks of work time out of that.

KTR needs to plan for two weeks to allow movement cordination between users. If, move is complete soon the NTP for next part can be

26‐Jul‐18

R0123

Per the SOW we are to replace all plumbing piping in the East and West restrooms. The drawings show the East restroom not having the piping replaced. Is the East restroom a finish up grade only or is the piping all being replaced?

All piping in each restroom will be replaced. 26‐Jul‐18

R0124

Per the SOW (notes 13 and 14) we are to route new sanitary lines from both restrooms out the North side of the building and connect all fixtures to it. Is it the intent of the documents for the contractor to remove the slab on grade and replace all sanitary lines? If we are remove the under slab sanitary lines are replaced do we still need to include the cost to investigate the existing sewer lines to verify it is functional?

Min removale of slab as necessary. KTR responsible to locate lines; drawings are for reference only. Yes investigate for functionality and verify no additional inlets exist within the sanitary sewer system.

26‐Jul‐18

R0125 Can you provide the existing as‐built drawings for this building?

Yes, however contractor is responsible for verifying all existing conditions. Please refer to Amendment 3 on how to acquire AS‐

BUIlt drawings.

26‐Jul‐18

R0126

Termite control report calls for us to replace wood mulch with landscape rock. It looks like one area on the North side with landscaping do want us to remove and replace this landscaping or remove and seed it like the rest of the perimeter?

Remove mulch, bring to grade and replace with grass seed. 26‐Jul‐18

R0127

According to the Termite report proposed solution, the entire exterior façade will need to be replaced. Can you confirm?

Yes, all exterior faux brick is to be replaced per the solution report 26‐Jul‐18

R0128

The Pre‐Phase calls for a survey and analysis of all exterior walls of building 861 and the contractor must identify which walls will require repair due to termite infestation within one month after NTP. However, the termite report states that the entire exterior facade of the building will need to be replaced to stop water penetration and to assess the termite damage. Is it acceptable to submit a termite control plan after award which includes inspection, treatment and follow up inspection within one month of NTP and inform the government of the termite damage as we are replacing the exterior façade?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0129

A Military officer on site mentioned there were hard copies of the original drawings available, can they be scanned and distributed? Since the provided structural drawing (example Sections 1/A3‐1 and 2/A3‐

1) are not consistent with the existing structural observed during the site visit at multiple location which significantly impacts the construction plan.

We are unaware who you spoke to or what drawings they are referring to. All drawings have been provided. Also please reference RFI # 125.

26‐Jul‐18

R0130

Do the exterior wall studs run full height, one piece, or are they interrupted near the attic level? If the studs are interrupted near the attic level and laterally supported by the ceiling framing to be removed, will the contractor be responsible for re‐supporting of the wall at the interruption?

Assume wall studs run full height. 27‐Jul‐18

R0131

What version of ASHREA 90.1 is to be used as a base line? Is there any betterment beyond the base line?

Use lates version applicable. 26‐Jul‐18

R0132

For the base bid price, should contractor assume the %25 percent of the existing exterior walls (faux brick, insulation, diagonal sheathing) be replaced along with 2X6 studs and interior finishes?

Prepare your bid in accordance with Attachment 8, Proposed

Solution Report. Assuming 25% of exterior walls need replacing (i.e. ‐ the entire wall system)

26‐Jul‐18

R0133

Which sections of the building will be evacuated for the contractor when contract awarded and which sections will remain in use by the owner during construction phase?

Refer to phasing plan provided in SOW 26‐Jul‐18

R0134 Is the construction work required be phased to three or five phases?

Construction work is 3 phases but there is a pre and a post phase as well.

26‐Jul‐18

R0135 Is the building communication system replacement part of the project scope?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0136

The project scope of work calls out to remove/reinstall existing furniture to accommodate construction. We need existing furniture plan for the building to assess manpower cost resulting from this. During the site visit we were not allowed accessing some areas or doors were locked at other sections.

Government does not have an existing furniture plan. 26‐Jul‐18

R0137 Please provide furniture specification/layout to be provided in B56 and 531.

Government does not have an existing furniture plan. 26‐Jul‐18

R0138

Key Note 9.1 shows up under the Key Notes on Sheets A2‐1, A2‐2, A6‐1 and A6‐2. It only shows up under the Key Notes. It doesn’t show up on the floor plan layout of those specific pages where all the other key notes are shown. Where does this sub‐ceiling get installed? This has a major impact since this would affect existing conduit/cabling and accessibility to these items.

See General Note #3 and plan on A0.1 for extent of ceiling work 26‐Jul‐18

R0139

There was mention of the possibility of using an alternate ‘siding’ material in lieu of the faux brick replacement. Please confirm the exterior material.

Faux brick or equal; refer to ACP 26‐Jul‐18

R0140

Has the Local Fire Department been notified about this project? What will the FD look for in terms of Life Safety during construction and phasing of construction?

Fire Department is aware of this project. All life safety during construction/phasing will be required to meet UFC 3‐600‐01

(all Chapters, but refer to Chapter 34). Please understand this project is considered a "Major Project" as defined in UFC 3‐

600‐01 and all applicable requirements must be met. Specific life safety questions or concerns need to be identified.

26‐Jul‐18

R0141

Is it possible to extend the proposal due date to give us a chance to review/assess RFI answers.

The proposal due date has been extended to 1 August 2018, at

01:00 PM CDT.

26‐Jul‐18

R0142

RFP stating working hours is from 7:30 am to

4:30 pm while the scope of work specifying night shift work in some areas. Please clarify.

Work hours are from 0730 to 1630 except for work in wing A1 and A2 per SOW Phase 1: line 3.

R0143

Bldg 56: There are 4 work stations to be installed in this building, what is the layout for each of the work stations, manufacturer, and locations in each room?

4 private offices, no preferance on manufacturer or location 26‐Jul‐18

R0144 Bldg 56: 2. Do each of the work stations need power and COMM?

rooms have wall outlets and com drops 26‐Jul‐18

R0145

Bldg 56: Who will be responsible for moving existing items out of the rooms before the work stations are installed?

Government will remove existing items as needed. 26‐Jul‐18

R0146

Bldg 56: Will contractor also be supplying chairs for each individual station? If so, what style?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0147

Bldg 531: There are 8 individual work stations that are to be installed in the specified area;

what is the layout of each specific work station?

Contractor design layout 26‐Jul‐18

R0148

Bldg 531: Also what is the design of these work stations (single desk, desk plus common work top, file cabinets, divider walls, etc.)?

Cubicle 26‐Jul‐18

R0149 Bldg 531: Do each of the work stations need power and COMM?

Yes 26‐Jul‐18

R0150

Bldg 531: Who will be responsible for moving existing items out of the room in this area before the work stations are installed?

Government will remove existing items as needed. 26‐Jul‐18

R0151

Bldg: 531: Will contractor also be supplying chairs for each individual station? If so, what style?

No 26‐Jul‐18

R0152 Provide new location of panel “A” for bid option #3.

New location should adhear to all codes. 26‐Jul‐18

R0153

Provide power and communication requirements for system furniture to be installed in building 56 & 531.

Yes, please make sure the furniture is hooked up with COMM and Electrical if needed.

26‐Jul‐18

R0154 Will a site visit be scheduled for buildings 56 and 531. If so time and date.

Visit occurred on 18 July 18. No other site visits scheduled. 26‐Jul‐18

R0155

Please provide furniture layout for the entire building so we can determine proper fire alarm coverage. We will need to know room designations and if it is a private office.

We will provide a building layout that will deliniate between office space and "cube farm" (Attachment 26). We do not have a furniture layout.

26‐Jul‐18

R0156 Is the new round and the oval duct in the attic to be single or double wall?

Project installed round and flat oval ducts in the attic space shall be single wall duct with external insulation.

26‐Jul‐18

R0157

Can you clarify the scope of work concerning the sprinkler heads? They look like they are brand new.

Refer to SOW and drawings provided for system sprinkler head locations. There are (3) dry systems in which (2) were recently installed. The fire suppression work identified in this SOW covers system 1 (Dry) and System 2

(Wet Stand Pipe). We are asking for head replacements and hydrostatic testing on both the dry and wet systems (from left to right riser numbers 1 & 2 of the

4 in place).

R0158

There is some confusion with the disconnecting and reconnecting of the electrical and communications to the workstations. The quantities and locations aren’t identified in the bid documents. Please provide the quantity of workstation groupings, the overall number of workstations, and a quantity of communication cables per workstation. Also, please confirm if the disconnect and reconnect of the workstations will be done at the same location. Any relocations could affect the length of power and connection and the communication cabling.

at a minimum 4 electrical/2 Comm ports. Work stations are listed in SOW. Disconnect and reconnect location is up to KTR.

There is electrical and comm in the rooms and it is up to the

KTR to make them work for the temp furniture.

26‐Jul‐18

R0159

There is some confusion with the drywall sub‐ ceiling as mentioned in Note 9.1. There is conduit mounted to the bottom of the bar joist that has junction boxes. The conduit will be fine where it is but the boxes need to remain accessible. In turn this means alterations to the conduit and repulling wire, which has no way to be quantified. Also, there is all the open cabling that is strung like spaghetti. Some of this cabling would be above the drywall and then have to drop down through it, and some below the drywall sub‐ceiling. In this case, it will be in the way because the drywall can’t be hung with the cable in the way. Please clarify in more detail what is necessary with the electrical in the drywall sub‐ceiling (Note 9.1).

Provide SF cost to replace.Once construction has started and the amount can be quantified, we will use the SF cost. Please reference section B Item number 1007 option.

26‐Jul‐18

R0160

The SOW is kind of confusing on the intent for the underground plumbing/sanitary sewer.

Paragraph 4. b.Note 10 refers to the East

Restrooms and says to reuse as much as possible. Are we to replace the underground piping to all the fixtures in the East Restrooms or do we just install a new exterior sewer main and tie into the existing main in the building under the floor for these restrooms?

No sanitary sewer piping will be reused. Replace piping to all fixtures and route new laterals and main piping as necessary to existing exterior sewer main.

26‐Jul‐18

R0161

The SOW paragraph 4.b.note 11 refers to the

West Restroom and has different language and states to have all new sanitary, vent and water piping in this area. So we will be replacing all the underground sewer lines to all the fixtures for these restrooms, correct?

Correct 26‐Jul‐18

R0162

Based on the answers to the above questions what is the intent of the SOW 4.b.note 15 if we are going to replace all the underground piping. There should be no need to camera the lines?

Camera will be required to identify any possib tie‐ ins not seen on drawings.