FA3047-16-R-0004 _Questions_and_Answers.pdf

Questions Answers

Is it okay to relocate RFP pages under corresponding tabs even if the pages are numerically out of order?

As long as the information is thoroughly and clearly presented, the order of the pages should not make a difference.

I wanted to inquire if a sample that is on Brushed stainless is acceptable as we are awaiting the sample of the nickel silver and unsure we can have it in time for submittal?

Please be aware that the metal name tags will be tested by spectrometer to identify the material composition and only the metals listed in the Statement of Work will be deemed acceptable.

Do we need to submit a sample of both the Nickel Stainless and the red brass?

Per the Statement of Work both of these materials are acceptable.

The engraving of the samples submitted shall be : standard black or SL Portuguese font... is the standard black referring to the color and the font request to the type?

This is a typographical error, please refer to the Statement of Work as this should read "standard block" as a font not a color.

While reviewing the RFQ more closely I noticed that on Page 9 line item 0201 has no quantity listed which does not seem to follow since the other line items 0101,0301,0401 all have quantities listed. Quantity was corrected in Amendment 0001

Can the solicitation be modified to the Brass for a fair bid by all?

Requirement was changed to read "Brass" versus "Red Brass";

composition requirements for Red Brass and Nickel Silver were also removed.

Is the clause EO 13658 applicable to this contract? No Could the due date be extended? Due date was extended to 22 January 2015

FA3047-16-R-0004 Questions & Answers

All questions included herein were previously answered through the issuance of Amendments 0001 and 0002. As a reminder all amendments must be signed dated and returned with the proposal or the proposal may be determined non-responsive and excluded from award consideration.

Sheet1