Atch_09_ADDENDUM_TO_FAR_PART_52.212-2_TABLE_2_-_Past_Performance_Confidence_Assessment_Ratings.pdf

PDF 88 KB Posted

Attached to
Grounds Maintenance Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA302019RA002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

Attachment 9 Addendum to FAR 52.212-2 Table 2 - Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Grounds Maintenance Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
Atch_01_Grounds_MX_-_Price_Exhibit_Rev_3.xls XLS spreadsheet
Solicitation_Amendment_FA302019RA0020003_SF_30.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA302019RA0020001_SF_30_(signed).pdf PDF
Solicitation_Amendment_FA302019RA0020002_SF_30_(signed).pdf PDF
Atch_02_Grounds_MX_-_PWS_Rev_2.pdf PDF
Atch_01_Grounds_MX_-_Price_Exhibit_Rev_2.xls XLS spreadsheet
6_Atch_11_Grounds_MX_-_Map_of_Lake_Texoma.pdf PDF
1_Acknowledgement_of_Receipt.pdf PDF
Amendment_1_-_RFP_questions_&_updates_-_signed.pdf PDF
4_Atch_02_Grounds_MX_-_PWS_Rev_1.pdf PDF
3_Atch_01_Grounds_MX_-_Price_Exhibit_Rev_1.xls XLS spreadsheet
5_Atch_10_Grounds_MX_-_Map_of_Sheppard_AFB.pdf PDF
2_FA3020-19-R-A002_RFP_Question_replies.pdf PDF
7_Atch_12_Grounds_MX_-_Map_of_Frederick_Airfield.pdf PDF
Atch_05_SAFB_151_Base_Pass.pdf PDF
Atch_03_Grounds_MX_-_CBA.pdf PDF
Solicitation_-_FA302019RA002.pdf PDF
Atch_02_Grounds_MX_-_PWS.pdf PDF
Atch_08_ADDENDUM_TO_FAR_PART_52.212-2_TABLE_1_-_RELEVANCY_ASSESSMENT.pdf PDF
Atch_06_Grounds_MX_-_QASP.pdf PDF
Atch_07_Grounds_MX_-_PPQ.pdf PDF
Atch_04_Grounds_MX_-_CBA-2016-9082.pdf PDF
Atch_01_Grounds_MX_-_Price_Exhibit.xls XLS spreadsheet
Atch_7A_Past_Performance_Cover_Letter_-_Grounds_MX-signed.pdf PDF
Show all 24

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

TABLE 2. Past Performance Confidence Assessment Ratings

Rating Description

SUBSTANTIAL CONFIDENCE

Based on the offeror’s quality/recent/relevant performance record, the government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

SATISFACTORY CONFIDENCE

performance record, the government has a reasonable

NEUTRAL CONFIDENCE

No recent/relevant performance is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

LIMITED CONFIDENCE

performance record, the government has a low

NO CONFIDENCE

performance record, the government has no

File details come from the government source that posted it.