Atch_06_Corrected_PPQ__Vertical_Transportation_Equipment.docx

DOCX document 38 KB Posted

Attached to
Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA3020-18-R-0003
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Education and Training Command

About this file

Attachment 6 Corrected PPQ - VTE

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE), newest first.
File Type Posted
VTE_Amendment_2.pdf PDF
VTE_Amendment_1.pdf PDF
Atch_06a_Past_Performance_Cover_Letter_-_VTE.pdf PDF
Atch_05_QASP__Vertical_Transportation_Equipment.pdf PDF
FA3020-18-R-0003_Vertical_Transportation_Equipment_(VTE).pdf PDF
Atch_01_Price_Exhibit.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Atch_03_WD_15-5255_Rev_5_10_Jan_2018.pdf PDF
Atch_02_PWS__Vertical_Transportation_Equipment.pdf PDF
Atch_06_PPQ__Vertical_Transportation_Equipment.docx DOCX document
Atch_04_SAFB_151_Base_Pass.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past Performance Questionnaire – FA3020-18-R-0003 Vertical Transportation Equipment (VTE) Maintenance and Repair Services PPQ: Due 3 Apr 18 NLT 4:00 pm CST Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Period of Performance

1. Beginning Date: through

C. Contract Scope

1. Quantity of how many total elevators were maintained under contract:

2. Quantity how many service calls (work orders) for repair and/or nonoperational equipment were issued under this contract to the contractor annually:

3. If management was not local what was the method provided to ensure quality control?

D. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No

E. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Description of work performed under this contract:

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

The Contractor:
E
V
S
M
U
N/A

1. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

3. Submitted reports on time and followed established performance schedules.

4. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.

5. Cooperated with customer personnel after award.

6. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?

7. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.

EXPLANATION:

☐ Yes ☐ No

IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

☐ Yes ☐ Default ☐ Convenience ☐ Pending Terminations ☐ No

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules).

SECTION 5: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what was promised in the proposal, I [ click and select an item ] award to the contractor today given that I had a choice.

Additional remarks:

[click and pick the date]

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: shaun.gann@us.af.mil Attachment 06 For Official Use Only Page 4 of 4

File details come from the government source that posted it.