Past Performance Questionaire.docx

Past Performance Questionnaire – Military Training Instructor Deliberate Development

The 502 Contracting Squadron of the Air Force is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the Military Training Instructor (MTI) Deliberate Development requirement. The requirement is to acquire Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) employees to provide non-personal services necessary to perform work in support of Air Force Basic Military (BMT) Training at JBSA Lackland, Texas in accordance to the provided Performance Work Statement (PWS) dated 22 February 2021. Contractor personnel shall perform services and support compatible with BMT training facilities, operating capacity and equipment for the application of advanced survey methodology and statistical analysis to develop and implement effective organizational and/or individual behavioral change strategies involved in the deliberate development of MTIs through their direct supervisors and continuation training.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.

Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 10 calendar days after your receipt of this letter. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations.

To assist you in preparing your response and expediting your reply, the questionnaire may be filled out by hand or electronically and e-mailed to lance.watters.1@us.af.mil. Please call Lance Watters at 210-552-2624 if you have any questions. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records.

Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

DE LA

Digitally signed by DE LA ROSA.ROBERT.1129086226 Date: 2021.04.01 08:30:05 -05'00'

ROBERT DE LA ROSA, GS-13, DAFROSA.ROBERT.1129086226

Contracting Officer

1 Attachment 1 Past Performance Questionnaire

Section 1: Contract Identification

A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Number:

D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):

E. Program Title:

F. Brief Program Description:

G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):

H. Period of Performance

3. Reason for difference (if applicable):

I. Contract Dollar Value

1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $

3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):

J. Description of work performed:

K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐No

L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel

Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.

For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.

Past Performance Questionnaire – Military Training Instructor Deliberate Development

Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):

Section 3: Respondent Identification

A. Respondent’s name:

B. Respondent’s title:

C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:

D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:

E. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 4: Performance Information

In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

Note: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise Past Performance Questionnaire, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead include probing and direct questions to draw out the required information desired.

1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.

3. Demonstrated a Phase in Plan and pool of employees. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

5. Followed approved quality control plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.

7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.

8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

9. Identified problems as they occurred. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

11. Displayed initiative to solve problems. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

12. Cooperated with Government personnel after award. SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

13. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract? SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

14. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain.

EXPLANATION:

· Yes

· No

· No

GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:

Additional remarks:

Respondent’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-Mail to: lance.watters.1@us.af.mil image2.png image3.png image4.png image5.png image1.png