Attachment 3 PPQ.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Offeror to complete Blocks 1-4)

Vendor Cage Code:

Vendor UEI Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain)

3. Contract Information

C Location

4. Project Description:

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details of similar requirements, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

NOTE: 81 REQUESTS THAT THE PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM E-MAIL IT

DIRECTLY TO SSGT CHRISTOPHER VAUGHN AT CHRISTOPHER.VAUGHN.9@US.AF.MIL

AND ANDREA HOWARD AT ANDREA.HOWARD.7@US.AF.MIL. THE GOVERNMENT

RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED ON THIS

FORM.

1. Contractor Information

Vendor:

Address:

Phone Number:

Alt Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact:

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

FA3010-23-R-0015 - Attachment 3 Traditional Protestant Music Director

Past Performance Questionnaire

Alaska

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds the tasks identified in the PWS. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few or minimal issues for which corrective actions were taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were advantageous to the customer. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. This ratings shall have NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the tasks identified in the PWS. The contractor performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was advantageous to the customer.

This rating shall have no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a situation occurred which the contractor had trouble overcoming and caused a negative impact on the customer.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contract performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor solutions were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which caused a negative impact to the customer. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

Does not apply to this contract Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

Attachment 2 Traditional Protestant Music Director

Past Performance Questionnaire

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

Please provide any additional information or comments here. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk:

How was the performance as a musician, vocalist, and either as a pianist/organist or an acoustic guitarist in a Protestant church/chapel?

How was the performance with a variety of musical genres and ability to read sheet music and/or basic improvisational skills.

How was their ability to work with and maintain a healthy, functional interpersonal relationship with chapel staff, fellow contractors, and community members.

How was the experience for providing musical support for special services like Easter, Christmas, and other Holy days.

5. How was their ability to provide oversight and direction for all traditional service musicians as well as oversight and direction for congregational singing/choral selections.

Attachment 3 Traditional Protestant Music Director

Past Performance Questionnaire

E VG S M U N