Industry_Questions_28_June_2016.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- HWY 94 and Enoch Rd. Signs
- Solicitation number
- FA2550-16-T-2010
About this file
See attached Industry Questions and Answers 28 June 16
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FA2550-16-T-2010-0001_HWY_94_and_Enoch_Rd_Signs.pdf | ||
| GLEN_15-5201_STATEMENT_OF_REQUIREMNT.pdf | ||
| HWY_94_and_Enoch_Rd._Signs.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
28 June 2016
The Following are questions and answers from a vendor:
Question 1 - If you are using the existing control base for these new signs. Or do you need a new one?
Response: We intend to use the existing control base for the new signs. One additional toggle switch will be required to operate the new "Irwin Gate Open/Closed" sign board. Per the SOR, the contractor shall provide onsite installation assistance to configure and link the radio networks and commissioning to insure that the system is fully operational.
Question 2 - Are you planning on using any of the existing equipment that is on the current signs or are you wanting all new materials?
Response: The SOR requires new equipment to include solar panels, battery/cabinet, etc. to be sized to operate the new signs.
Question 3 - Are these all new locations for these signs
Response: The SOR Project background shows reusing the existing sign posts on Highway 94 and North Curtis Road for the new message boards. A new sign assembly will be installed on South Curtis Road as shown on the SOR Exhibit.
Question 4 - Line items 4-6, are these new signs black on white or do you want them green with white to match the electronic signs?
Response: The SOR Exhibit shows the required sign colors and wording as approved by CDOT.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .