Education Advisor and Tester Q_A_pt2.pdf
PDF 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EDUCATION ADVISOR AND TEST ADMINISTRATOR Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2543-20-R-0018
About this file
This document is a combined synopsis and solicitation from the Department of the Air Force Space Command seeking quotes for Education Advisor and Test Administrator services at Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado. The requirement includes a base year plus four one-year option periods to support the Education and Training Office. Quotes are due by September 23, 2020 and the contract will be set aside for a woman-owned small business. Offerors must provide fully burdened fixed unit prices for 248 units of Test Administrator services and 300 units of Education Advisor services per year. The units equate to weekly hours outlined in the attached statement of work. Questions are due by September 16 and the government will evaluate quotes based on price with the lowest priced technically acceptable offer receiving award.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3_ Updated Cost and Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2_ Updated_ Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| Education Advisor and Tester Q_A.pdf | ||
| RFQ - Amendment 1_ Education Advisor and Test Exmaniner.pdf | ||
| 1_ Updated_ 2020 ED Advisor and Test Exam_ SOW.pdf | ||
| 2_ Wage Determination _ 15-5415.pdf | ||
| 1_ 2020 ED Advisor and Test Exam_ SOW.pdf | ||
| 5_ Cost and Pricing Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFQ - Education Advisor and Test Exmaniner.pdf | ||
| 3_ Provisions and Clauses.pdf | ||
| 4_ Memo - NDAA Section 889(a)(1)(B).pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Education Advisor and Tester – QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS, Pt.2
1) Question: Why is this listed in units if its for regular scheduled services to be performed? Why not a total number of hours so it is clear, concise and creates a mutual understanding (level playing field when evaluating price)?
Answer: This contract was originally done around 10 years ago and we have been consistent in this process ever since. We’re comfortable with the “units.” Additionally, the planning docs all reference the units.
2) Question: What is considered technically acceptable?
Answer: In the updated provisions and clauses, it states, ‘Technical Capability - Explain the capabilities the company can provide for each position (Past Performance is not required and will not be evaluated).’
This will assist the Government in determining if a company was 1) able to understand The requirement and 2) if the company is capable of meeting and fulfilling the tasks listed in the SOW.
3) Question: Would it be possible to provide a 1- or 2-day extension on this requirement?
Answer: We understand that COVID-19 has affected everyone, but due to time constraints, we are unable to extend this solicitation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .