Atch_3_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 31 KB Posted

Attached to
Grounds Maintenance Re-Acquisition at Buckley AFB Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA254320R0002
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Space Command

About this file

This solicitation package seeks proposals for grounds maintenance services at Buckley Air Force Base in Colorado. The services include maintaining improved, semi-improved, and unimproved grounds as well as vegetative beds, drainage ditches, tree pruning and trimming, xeriscaping, planting, and special event support. The requirement is set aside for HUBZone small businesses and involves a firm fixed price contract for one base year plus four option years. Proposals are due by November 25, 2019 and will be evaluated for technical acceptability, price, and past performance using a lowest price technically acceptable process. The incumbent contractor's past performance will be assessed through a questionnaire sent to previous customers. A site visit is scheduled for November 7, 2019 and requests for information must be submitted by November 25, 2019. The solicitation number is FA2543-20-R-0002 and is issued by the Department of the Air Force Space Command.

Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment 3

FA2543-19-R-A002

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

The below-named contractor/offeror is being considered for award of a contract for Grounds Maintenance Services at Buckley AFB, CO. A primary consideration in our selection process is the contractor’s history of performance of similar efforts.

Please fill out this questionnaire and send your response directly to the below individuals. Make every effort to be thorough in your answers/comments. Completed questionnaires can be returned via fax or email to the following:

Attn: Jenny L. Meadlin and Travis Zoellner 460th Contracting Flight, Base Infrastructure Section Phone: 720-847-6674/ 720-847-6452

FAX: 720-847-6443

EMAIL: jenny.meadlin@us.af.mil and travis.zoellner.1@us.af.mil

A. GENERAL INFORMATION:

Offeror’s Name:_______________________________________________________________________________

Address:_______________________________________________________________________________

Telephone Number:________________________ Point of Contact:______________________________________

B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION

Name:_____________________________________ Title:_____________________________________________

Organization & Address:_________________________________________________________________________

Telephone: ___________________ FAX:__________________ Email:___________________________________

C. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Title:_________________________________________________________________________________

Period of Performance:__________________________ Contract Number:_________________________________

Total contract value, including all modifications and options:____________________________________________

Annual contract expenditures:_____________________________________________________________________

Number of acres: IMPROVED_____________ SEMI-IMPROVED____________ UNIMPROVED____________

Description of contract effort:_____________________________________________________________________ mailto:jenny.meadlin@us.af.mil mailto:travis.zoellner.1@us.af.mil

D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

The Air Force will use your survey responses to determine the level of confidence, based on the offeror’s past performance record, concerning the offeror’s ability to successfully perform our requirement in accordance with the contract. Please assign the following performance level codes to each of the questioned areas listed below based on the contractor’s performance at your organization or installation. The confidence codes selected will indicate the performance in each area.

RESPONDENT WILL NOT FURNISH ANY PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION TO OFFEROR

SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL FOR THIS SOLICITATION.

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by circling the appropriate code using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or was satisfactory.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a score.

Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary) and any performance problems, the contractor’s solutions, and if the solution resolved the problem.

E. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION AREAS

Please use the above ratings and their assigned definitions to describe the offeror’s performance in the following areas:

1. Contractor’s overall compliance with the requirements of your Performance Work Statement, Statement of Work, specifications, or other similar documents.

S US N/A

2. Contractor assigned personnel with the required skills (e.g. planting, irrigation, mowing, etc.) to accomplish the work.

S US N/A

3. Contractor provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirement.

S US N/A

4. Contractor hired experienced workforce. S US N/A

5. Contractor provided well-substantiated pricing data for modifications. S US N/A

6. Contractor resolved customer complaints in a reasonable and cooperative manner.

S US N/A

7. Contractor’s willingly and effectively corrected identified deficiencies. S US N/A

8. Contractor provided an acceptable quality control plan ensuring identified deficiencies were corrected prior to contract owner/Government inspection.

S US N/A

9. Contractor maintained records/reported data/submitted required reports. S US N/A

10. Contractor’s overall management and responsiveness. S US N/A

11. Indicate overall quality of service. S US N/A

COMMENTS/REMARKS_____________________________________________________________________

3. If a government contract, did the contractor receive any Contract Discrepancy Reports, Letters of Concern, or Cure Notices?_____________ If yes, please describe (including number of instances):

2. If given the opportunity, would you award another contract to this contractor?_______

Please explain response below:

4. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance: S (Satisfactory) US (Unsatisfactory)

Signature of Respondent___________________________________ Date____________

Job Title:________________________________________________________________

Thank you for taking the time to complete this questionnaire.

LEGEND OF TERMS:

OFFEROR: The contractor for which past performance is being evaluated

SOLICITATION NUMBER: The procurement document number the government uses to identify a specific Request for Proposal (RFP)

RESPONDENT: The person and/or organization evaluating past performance

CONTRACT NUMBER: If the offeror had a contract or purchase order with your company/firm, the identifying contract number associated with awarded contract/purchase order

CONTRACT TITLE: Project title of work performed

CONTRACT VALUE: Contract/purchase order total dollar value, including all modifications and options

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .