Amendment 02 to RFP FA2517-08-R-8001.pdf

NSN 7540-01-152-0070 STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 6

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11 August 2009

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE

FA2517

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

FA2517 - 21 CONS/LGCZB

BEVERLI DONEGON

719-556-3847

135 DOVER STREET, SUITE 1055 TEL: 719-556-3847

Peterson AFB CO 80914-1117 FAX:

See Item 7

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., street, city, county, State, and ZIP Code)

X

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

FA2517-09-R-8001

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. Accounting and Appropriation Data (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER :

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION: (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

A. The purpose of this amendment is to implement changes to Solicitation FA2517-08-R-8001.

The conforming action described in this amendment does not relieve the Offeror of the requirement to acknowledge receipt of each amendment issued in accordance with instructions in Item 11 above and as indicated in Block 14 of the SF33, Solicitation, Offer and

Award.

Continued on next page

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

KIMBERLY J. DOYLE

Kimberly.doyle@peterson.af.mil

719-556-8985, DSN 834-8985

15B. NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

15C.DATE SIGNED

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

16C.DATE SIGNED

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)

B. Summary of Changes (from/to changes are bolded and underlined):

Section/Page#

/Item #

Document Change/Revision/Answer

Solicitation/

Section L, L-5, B, 1, b

SOLICITATION FROM: The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the

Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the

Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

TO: The proposal shall be clear, concise, and shall include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired. The proposal should not simply rephrase or restate the

Government’s requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Offerors shall assume that the

Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and past performance, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s proposal.

Solicitation/

Section L, L-5, D, 1, a

SOLICITATION FROM: Past Performance Contract Citations. The Offeror shall provide not more than ten (10) total recent and relevant performance citations for the proposed contractor team. For past performance on an IDIQ contract, a single task order will count as one citation. The following information should be included for each identified contract and subcontract. Offerors are cautioned to ensure that information is current and accurate with respect to the listed points of contact.

TO: Past Performance Contract Citations. The Offeror shall provide not more than ten (10) total recent and relevant performance citations for the proposed contractor team. An IDIQ contract may be submitted as one citation or a citation can be individual task orders. The following information should be included for each identified contract and subcontract. Offerors are cautioned to ensure that information is current and accurate with respect to the listed points of contact.

Section M, M-

3, B, 4

SOLICITATION FROM: Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE). AFE Service

Requirements are part of an A76 Streamlined Acquisition process. The Government may not award CLINs associated with AFE if they exceed the final A-76 Agency

Cost Estimate (ACE).

TO: Aircrew Flight Equipment (AFE). AFE Service

Requirements are part of an A76 Streamlined Acquisition process. After the SSA makes an integrated assessment best value award decision, the AFE proposed CLIN prices of the selected offeror will be compared to the A76 Agency

Cost Estimate (ACE). The Government may not award

CLINs associated with AFE if the selected offeror’s AFE

CLIN prices exceed the final A76 ACE.

3, C, 1, b, (2)

SOLICITATION FROM: Relevancy. For each recent citation, a relevancy determination of the offeror’s present and past performance information, including subcontractors and teaming partners will be made. In determining relevancy of present and past performance information, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort being proposed by the offeror, subcontractor or teaming partner whose information is being reviewed and evaluated. More relevant performance may have a greater impact on the confidence assessment than less recent or less relevant efforts. Relevancy contemplates present or past performance of a similar magnitude of effort and complexity of effort. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The performance matrix and data obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevance of present and past information. The PCAG will conduct an in-depth review and evaluation of all performance data obtained to determine how closely the work performed relates to the proposed effort. The PCAG will, as deemed necessary, confirm present and past performance information identified by offerors in their proposals. The Government may consider relevant information performed for other agencies of the federal, state or local Governments and commercial customers. Each citation will be evaluated in the following focus areas:

TO: Relevancy. For each recent citation, relevancy determinations of the offeror’s present and past performance information, including subcontractors and teaming partners will be made in each of the focus areas defined below. In determining relevancy of present and past performance information, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort being proposed by the offeror, subcontractor or teaming partner whose information is being reviewed and evaluated. More relevant performance may have a greater impact on the confidence assessment than less recent or less relevant efforts. Relevancy contemplates present or past performance of a similar magnitude of effort and complexity of effort. The Government is not bound by the offeror’s opinion of relevancy. The performance matrix and data obtained from other sources will be used to establish the relevance of present and past information. The PCAG will conduct an in-depth review and evaluation of all performance data obtained to determine how closely the work performed relates to the proposed effort. The PCAG will, as deemed necessary, confirm present and past performance information identified by offerors in their proposals. The Government may consider relevant information performed for other agencies of the federal, state or local Governments and commercial customers. Each citation will be evaluated in the following focus areas:

3, C, 1, b, (2), 1

(RFP

RELEVANCY

DEFINITIONs)

Program

Management

(Focus Area 1)

SOLICITATION FROM: 1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (Focus Area 1):

RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in 1) support at 2 or more sites, 2) formal training program, and 3) quality control program.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in support for at least 1 site, and at least one of the following

1) formal training program, or 2) quality control program.

NOT RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in 1 or less of the following areas: 1) support for at least 1 site, 2, 2) formal training program, or 3) quality control program.

TO: 1. PROGRAM MANAGEMENT (Focus Area 1):

RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving 1) support at 2 or more sites, 2) formal training program, and 3) quality control program.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving support for at least 1 site, and at least one of the following 1) formal training program, or 2) quality control program.

NOT RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving support in 1 or less of the following areas: 1) support for at least 1 site, 2, 2) formal training program, or 3) quality control program.

3, C, 1, b, (2), 1

(RFP

RELEVANCY

DEFINITIONs)

Critical Aircraft

Maintenance

(Focus Area 2)

SOLICITATION FROM: 2. CRITICAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE

(Focus Area 2):

RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical (DoD) helicopter aircraft (rotary wing) with experience in all of the following areas: 1) organizational level maintenance (defined in AFI 21-101), 2) intermediate level maintenance (defined in AFI 21-101) and 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical DoD aircraft (rotary or fixed wing) with experience in at least 2 of the following areas: 1) organizational level maintenance, 2) intermediate level maintenance and 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

NOT RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical Non-DoD rotary or fixed wing aircraft with experience in 1 or less of the following areas:

1) organizational level maintenance, 2) intermediate level maintenance or 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

TO: 2. CRITICAL AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE (Focus

Area 2):

RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical (DoD) helicopter aircraft (rotary wing) with performance in all of the following areas: 1) organizational level maintenance (defined in AFI 21-101), 2) intermediate level maintenance (defined in AFI 21-101) and 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical DoD aircraft (rotary or fixed wing) with performance in at least 2 of the following areas: 1) organizational level maintenance, 2) intermediate level maintenance and 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

NOT RELEVANT – Contract involved maintenance responsibility for critical Non-DoD rotary or fixed wing aircraft with performance in 1 or less of the following areas:

1) organizational level maintenance, 2) intermediate level maintenance or 3) providing aircraft in coordination with flying operations to meet a daily/weekly/monthly flying schedule.

3, C, 1, b, (2), 1

(RFP

RELEVANCY

DEFINITIONs)

Logistics

(Focus Area 3)

SOLICITATION FROM: 3. LOGISTICS (Focus Area 3):

RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in all of the following areas: 1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in at least 2 of the following areas: 1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

NOT RELEVANT – Contract involved experience in 1 or less of the following areas: 1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

TO: 3. LOGISTICS (Focus Area 3):

RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving performance in all of the following areas: 1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

SOMEWHAT RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving performance in at least 2 of the following areas: 1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

NOT RELEVANT – Aircraft maintenance contract involving performance in 1 or less of the following areas:

1) supply system interfaces, 2) tool control, and 3) equipment management processes and procedures.

C. The solicitation is amended to reflect changes described herein; a conformed solicition is provided as an attachment to this amendment. Changed areas in the conformed solicitation are indicated by a vertical line in the right margin.