Attachment 15 Draft Past Performance Rating Form.docx

DOCX document 84 KB Posted

Attached to
Technical Management Advisory Services (TMAS) 2 Draft FOPR UPDATED Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA2486-20-XXX
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Technical Management Advisory Services (TMAS) 2 Draft FOPR UPDATED, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment 10 Draft CDRLs (Exhibit A).pdf PDF
Attachment 20 Business Efficiency.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 9 Draft B-Table TMAS 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 4 Draft ITO-96 CTG - HTRO 6 Dec.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 Draft Eval Criteria - HTRO 9 Dec.docx DOCX document
Attachment 7 Reserved.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 Draft 96 CTG LOE Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 6 Draft Uniform Pricing Template (UPT).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 14 Draft 96 CTG TMAS 2 Cross Reference Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 12 Draft Financial Responsibility.doc DOC document
Attachment 11 Draft 96 CTG DD254.pdf PDF
Attachment 16 Draft Standard HTRO Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment 19 Draft TO.pdf PDF
Attachment 17 Draft 96 CTG Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 18 Work Sample Cover Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 Reserved.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 Draft PWS TMAS 2 - 96 CTG.docx DOCX document
Attachment 2 Reserved.pdf PDF
Attachment 13 Reserved.pdf PDF
Show all 19

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM

PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

CONTRACTOR NAME:
Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT NUMBER:
Click here to enter text.
ORDER NUMBER (if applicable):
Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE:
Click here to enter text.

TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE, INCLUDING OPTIONS: MM/YYYY -

MM/YYYY or MM/YYYY - Present Click here to enter text.

Period of Performance for THIS INDIVIDUAL rating form: (cannot exceed 12 months)
Click here to enter text.

PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):

NAME:
Click here to enter text.
TITLE:
Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER:
Click here to enter text.
PHONE:
Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL:
Click here to enter text.

SIGNATURE OF RATER: (Person who can verify the data - Government Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative, Government Program Manager, Etc)

For each of the five (5) criteria listed below, the rater must choose one (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. Additional text is limited to no more than 200 words.

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Rating
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the

FA2486-20-F-1001

Attachment 15 contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

OPTIONAL - ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

Click here to enter text.

2. SCHEDULE

Rating
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

3. COST CONTROL

Rating
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

4. Management (or Business Relations)

Rating
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

5. Regulatory Compliance

Rating
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not Applicable

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .