Attachment 17 Draft AEDC Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- TMAS 2 AEDC DRAFT FOPR Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA2486-20-F-1004
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment 4 Draft ITO - AEDC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Reserved.pdf | ||
| Attachment 10 DRAFT CDRLs AEDC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 8 Reserved.pdf | ||
| Draft FOPR Comment Matrix.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 7 Reserved.pdf | ||
| Attachment 16 Draft HTRO Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| Attachment 09 Draft AEDC B-Table Implementation.pdf | ||
| Attachment 18 Work Sample Cover Sheet.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Draft Eval Criteria - AEDC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 15 Draft Past Performance Rating Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 Draft AEDC LOE Matrix.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 Draft AEDC PWS.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 Draft Uniform Pricing Template (UPT).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 13 Reserved.pdf | ||
| Attachment 11 Draft DD254 AEDC.pdf | ||
| Attachment 14 Draft AEDC TMAS 2 Cross Reference Matrix.pdf | ||
| Attachment 9 Draft B-Table TMAS 2.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 12 Draft Financial Responsibility.pdf |
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self Score Sheet
| TMAS 2 AEDC Task Order |
| SOLICITATION # FA2486-20-F-1004 |
| ATTACHMENT 17 |
| DRAFT SELF-SCORING MATRIX |
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] |
| Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information |
| Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Max Count | Offeror's Position/Location Total | Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.1 | Task Order Management | |||||||
| 3.1.1 | Number of total positions (max CME count) | 220 | 4.55 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.2 | Number of geographically separated work locations supported | 7 | 142.86 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.3 | Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 90 day span | 220 | 4.55 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.4 | Number of non-incumbent positions hired in a 30 day span | 10 | 100.00 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.5 | Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current non-critical sensitive investigation (secret) / Tier 3 Investigation or above (max positions) | 220 | 4.55 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.6 | Financial stability - ability to cover up to three months of base year cost, truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22" | 25 | 40.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.7 | Business Structure Efficiency: Direct Labor Cost / (Overheads and G&A) **Exclude Fringe from Overhead pool** see Business_Efficiency Tabs | 1000 | 1.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2 | Technical | |||||||
| 3.2.1 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical engineering support on DoD RDT&E Ground Test (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.2 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for air breathing propulsion testing (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.3 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for hypersonic vehicle testing to inlcude propulsion, simulation, flow, high-temperature effects, materials characterization, and boundary layer. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.4 | Number of Contracts/TOs that operate in a multifunctional team including military, government civilians, as well as other contractors. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.5 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide support to a Lead Developmental Test Organization (LDTO). (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.6 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for testing of high-altitude/space environmental effects and senors (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.7 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for high altitude rocket propulsion. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.8 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide multi-spectral signature measurement and analysis. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.9 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for transonic, supersonic, or hypersonic wind tunnel testing for DoD programs. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.10 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide direct technical support for captive trajectory testing of DoD weapon systems. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.11 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide mission-focused ID&C operations support and strategic planning (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.12 | Number of Contracts/TOs that provide project and financial managemnet support for DoD entities. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 1 | 1,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | 1000 Points | 750 Points | 500 Points | 0 Points | -500 Points | -1000 Points | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score |
| 3.3 | DSS Vunerability Rating | |||||||||
| 3.3.1 | Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment | Superior | Commendable | Satisfactory | No Current Rating Available | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | 1 | 1,000 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total) | Points for Each Rating | Weight Factor | Max Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.4 | Work Sample CPAR Ratings | ||||||
| 3.4.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years | 1,000 | 30 | 30,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.2 | CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years | 900 | 10 | 9,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.3 | CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years | 800 | 10 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.4 | CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years | (250) | 10 | (2,500) | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.5 | CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years | (1,000) | 40 | (40,000) | 0 | 0 |
Totals 0.00% 30,000 0 0
| Maximum Total Score | 68,000 |
| Offeror's Total Self-Score | 0 |
Business_Efficiency
| Fill in | cells. Formulas will carry out remaining calculations resulting in "Offeror's Weighted Self-Score" | ||||||||
| WORK SAMPLE #1 | WORK SAMPLE #2 | ||||||||
| Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | COMBINED TOTAL | COMBINED APPLICABLE OVERHEADS | Calculated Efficiency | ||
| Labor Hours | - 0 | Labor Hours | - 0 | Direct Labor: | $ - 0 | Direct Labor: | $ - 0 | 0.00% | |
| Labor Dollars | $ - 0 | Labor Dollars | $ - 0 | Labor O/H: | $ - 0 | Indirect Labor: | $ - 0 | ||
| Fringe | $ - 0 | Fringe | $ - 0 | Fringe: | $ - 0 | Labor Cost (minus Fringe): | $ - 0 | ||
| Labor O/H | $ - 0 | Labor O/H | $ - 0 | Labor G&A: | $ - 0 | ||||
| Material | $ - 0 | Material | $ - 0 | Labor Cost: | $ - 0 | ||||
| Subcontracts | $ - 0 | Subcontracts | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Material O/H | $ - 0 | Material O/H | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other O/H | $ - 0 | Other O/H | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Travel | $ - 0 | Travel | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other ODCs | $ - 0 | Other ODCs | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Labor G&A | $ - 0 | Labor G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other G&A | $ - 0 | Other G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Cost | $ - 0 | Cost | $ - 0 | ||||||
| FCCOM | $ - 0 | FCCOM | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Profit | $ - 0 | Profit | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Price | $ - 0 | Price | $ - 0 |
| Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 0 | 2 | 2,000 | - 0 | 0 |
Business_Efficiency EXAMPLE
| Fill in | cells. Formulas will carry out remaining calculations resulting in "Offeror's Weighted Self-Score" | ||||||||
| WORK SAMPLE #1 | WORK SAMPLE #2 | ||||||||
| Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | COMBINED TOTAL | COMBINED APPLICABLE OVERHEADS | Calculated Efficiency | ||
| Labor Hours | 19,765 | Labor Hours | 19,765 | Direct Labor: | $ 2,274,886 | Direct Labor: | $ 2,274,886 | 47.26% | |
| Labor Dollars | $ 1,137,443 | Labor Dollars | $ 1,137,443 | Labor O/H: | $ 1,776,518 | Indirect Labor: | $ 2,538,978 | ||
| Fringe | $ 733,655 | Fringe | $ 733,655 | Fringe: | $ 1,467,310 | Labor Cost (minus Fringe): | $ 4,813,864 | ||
| Labor O/H | $ 888,259 | Labor O/H | $ 888,259 | Labor G&A: | $ 762,460 | ||||
| Material | $ 134,123 | Material | $ 134,123 | Labor Cost: | $ 6,281,174 | ||||
| Subcontracts | $ - 0 | Subcontracts | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Material O/H | $ 1,749 | Material O/H | $ 1,749 | ||||||
| Other O/H | $ 477,133 | Other O/H | $ 477,133 | ||||||
| Travel | $ 41,978 | Travel | $ 41,978 | ||||||
| Other ODCs | $ 83,424 | Other ODCs | $ 83,424 | ||||||
| Labor G&A | $ 381,230 | Labor G&A | $ 381,230 | ||||||
| Other G&A | $ - 0 | Other G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Cost | $ 3,878,994 | Cost | $ 3,878,994 | ||||||
| FCCOM | $ 36,484 | FCCOM | $ 36,484 | ||||||
| Profit | $ 391,656 | Profit | $ 391,656 | ||||||
| Price | $ 4,307,134 | Price | $ 4,307,134 |
| Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 473 | 2 | 2,000 | 945 | 945 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .