Attachment 17 Draft 412TW Self-Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 48 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- FA2486-20-F-1003
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Self Score Sheet
| TMAS 2 412TW Task Order |
| FA2486-20-F-1003 |
| ATTACHMENT 17 |
| DRAFT SELF-SCORING MATRIX |
| OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE] |
| Note: See Attachment 05, Evaluation Criteria, for Additional Information |
| Note: Offerors only fill in the orange shaded blocks throughout |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Max Count | Offeror's Position/Location Total | Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.1 | Task Order Management | |||||||
| 3.1.1 | Number of total positions (max CME count) | 75 | 13.33 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.2 | Number of geographically separated work locations supported | 2 | 500.00 | 2 | 2,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.3 | Number of incumbent positions transitioned in a 90 day span | 75 | 13.33 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.4 | Number of non-incumbent positions hired in a 30 day span | 10 | 100.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.5 | Percentage of positions filled within 30 days of vacancy opening, truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22" | 100 | 10.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.6 | Financial stability - ability to cover up to three months of base year cost, truncate decimals--e.g. enter 22.6 percent as "22" | 25 | 40.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.7 | Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current non-critical sensitive investigation with Special Access Program (SAP) or above | 25 | 40.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.8 | Number of personnel supporting programs requiring an adjudicated, current critical sensitive investigation with Special Compartmented Information (SCI) | 25 | 40.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.1.9 | Business Structure Efficiency: Direct Labor Cost / (Overheads and G&A) **Exclude Fringe from Overhead pool** see Business_Efficiency Tabs | 1000 | 1.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2 | Technical | |||||||
| 3.2.1 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support utilizing Theory of Constraints or Critical Chain Project Management (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.2 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support utilizing web-based schedule management software (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.3 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS support in the area of flight test (Max count 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.4 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS supporting facilities/infrastructure, construction projects, drawings design reviews, inspections and/or cost estimates (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.5 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Program Management A&AS supporting Air Vehicle Management activities. | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.6 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing Range and Instrumentation A&AS support in the areas of real-time data processing and wireless instrumentation (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.7 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS engineering support in flight and ground test planning, provisioning, executing, analyzing and reporting (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.8 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing software engineering in the areas of leading-edge Internet technologies and programming languages (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.9 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS systems engineering support for Range Test Capabilities or for modeling and simulation environments for aircraft systems testing. (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.10 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 5 | 5,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.11 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support within an Anechoic Chamber, Free Space (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.12 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing electronic warfare engineering A&AS support within Open Air Range (OAR) (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.13 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS support on Free Space Anechoic Chamber I&M programs (max 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 4 | 4,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.2.14 | Number of Contracts/TOs providing A&AS electronic warfare support in flight and ground test planning, provisioning, executing, analyzing and reporting (max count = 5) | 5 | 200.00 | 3 | 3,000 | 0 | 0 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | 1000 Points | 750 Points | 500 Points | 0 Points | -500 Points | -1000 Points | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score |
| 3.3 | DSS Vunerability Rating | |||||||||
| 3.3.1 | Most recent DSS vulnerability assessment | Superior | Commendable | Satisfactory | No Current Rating Available | Marginal | Unsatisfactory | 1 | 1,000 |
| Eval Criteria Section | Category | Percentage of CPAR Ratings (Cannot Exceed 100.00% in Total) | Points for Each Rating | Weight Factor | Max Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 3.4 | Work Sample CPAR Ratings | ||||||
| 3.4.1 | CPAR categories rated "exceptional" over last 5 years | 1,000 | 30 | 30,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.2 | CPAR categories rated "very good" over last 5 years | 900 | 10 | 9,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.3 | CPAR categories rated "satisfactory" over last 5 years | 800 | 10 | 8,000 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.4 | CPAR categories rated "marginal" over last 5 years | (250) | 10 | (2,500) | 0 | 0 | |
| 3.4.5 | CPAR categories rated "unsatisfactory" over last 5 years | (1,000) | 40 | (40,000) | 0 | 0 |
Totals 0.00% 30,000 0 0
| Maximum Total Score | 119,000 |
| Offeror's Total Self-Score | 0 |
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&10Page &P of &N
FA2486-20-F-1003
ATTACHMENT 17
Business_Efficiency
| Fill in | cells. Formulas will carry out remaining calculations resulting in "Offeror's Weighted Self-Score" | ||||||||
| WORK SAMPLE #1 | WORK SAMPLE #2 | ||||||||
| Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | COMBINED TOTAL | COMBINED APPLICABLE OVERHEADS | Calculated Efficiency | ||
| Labor Hours | - 0 | Labor Hours | - 0 | Direct Labor: | $ - 0 | Direct Labor: | $ - 0 | 0.00% | |
| Labor Dollars | $ - 0 | Labor Dollars | $ - 0 | Labor O/H: | $ - 0 | Indirect Labor: | $ - 0 | ||
| Fringe | $ - 0 | Fringe | $ - 0 | Fringe: | $ - 0 | Labor Cost (minus Fringe): | $ - 0 | ||
| Labor O/H | $ - 0 | Labor O/H | $ - 0 | Labor G&A: | $ - 0 | ||||
| Material | $ - 0 | Material | $ - 0 | Labor Cost: | $ - 0 | ||||
| Subcontracts | $ - 0 | Subcontracts | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Material O/H | $ - 0 | Material O/H | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other O/H | $ - 0 | Other O/H | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Travel | $ - 0 | Travel | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other ODCs | $ - 0 | Other ODCs | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Labor G&A | $ - 0 | Labor G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Other G&A | $ - 0 | Other G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Cost | $ - 0 | Cost | $ - 0 | ||||||
| FCCOM | $ - 0 | FCCOM | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Profit | $ - 0 | Profit | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Price | $ - 0 | Price | $ - 0 |
| Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 0 | 2 | 2,000 | - 0 | 0 |
Business_Efficiency EXAMPLE
| Fill in | cells. Formulas will carry out remaining calculations resulting in "Offeror's Weighted Self-Score" | ||||||||
| WORK SAMPLE #1 | WORK SAMPLE #2 | ||||||||
| Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | TOTAL | Cost Element | COMBINED TOTAL | COMBINED APPLICABLE OVERHEADS | Calculated Efficiency | ||
| Labor Hours | 19,765 | Labor Hours | 19,765 | Direct Labor: | $ 2,274,886 | Direct Labor: | $ 2,274,886 | 47.26% | |
| Labor Dollars | $ 1,137,443 | Labor Dollars | $ 1,137,443 | Labor O/H: | $ 1,776,518 | Indirect Labor: | $ 2,538,978 | ||
| Fringe | $ 733,655 | Fringe | $ 733,655 | Fringe: | $ 1,467,310 | Labor Cost (minus Fringe): | $ 4,813,864 | ||
| Labor O/H | $ 888,259 | Labor O/H | $ 888,259 | Labor G&A: | $ 762,460 | ||||
| Material | $ 134,123 | Material | $ 134,123 | Labor Cost: | $ 6,281,174 | ||||
| Subcontracts | $ - 0 | Subcontracts | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Material O/H | $ 1,749 | Material O/H | $ 1,749 | ||||||
| Other O/H | $ 477,133 | Other O/H | $ 477,133 | ||||||
| Travel | $ 41,978 | Travel | $ 41,978 | ||||||
| Other ODCs | $ 83,424 | Other ODCs | $ 83,424 | ||||||
| Labor G&A | $ 381,230 | Labor G&A | $ 381,230 | ||||||
| Other G&A | $ - 0 | Other G&A | $ - 0 | ||||||
| Cost | $ 3,878,994 | Cost | $ 3,878,994 | ||||||
| FCCOM | $ 36,484 | FCCOM | $ 36,484 | ||||||
| Profit | $ 391,656 | Profit | $ 391,656 | ||||||
| Price | $ 4,307,134 | Price | $ 4,307,134 |
| Points Per Position/ Location (1,000 Points/Max Count) | Weight Factor | Max. Possible Points | Offeror's Self-Score | Offeror's Weighted Self-Score |
| 473 | 2 | 2,000 | 945 | 945 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .