Atch 8 - Past Performance Questionnaire (12 Aug 22).rtf

Attachment 8

MEMORANDUM FOR:

FROM: AFICC/765th Enterprise Sourcing Flight 427 Cody Avenue, Bldg. 90333 Hurlburt Field, FL 32554

SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Information

The 765th Enterprise Sourcing Flight is in the process of selecting a contractor for Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) MC-12 Tactical Systems Operator Training Support Services located at Will Rogers Airport, Oklahoma City, OK. Detailed information regarding this solicitation may be found at http://www.SAM.gov by searching Reference No.: FA002122R0008.

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm identified on the attached questionnaire. Please complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) and e-mail your completed PPQ to todd.martinez.1@us.af.mil and steffanie.david.1@us.af.mil" steffanie.david.1@us.af.mil. It is important that you return the PPQ directly to the Government.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offeror’s Present and Past Performance on contracts, which reflects the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Your contribution and prompt attention to this questionnaire is greatly appreciated and will be one of the keys to a timely and successful Source Selection. To be considered timely, responses must be received no later than 29 August 2022, 12:00 PM Central Standard Time (CST). Your completed questionnaire will become part of the Source Selection file.

If you have any questions concerning this request, please contact Mr. Todd Martinez OR 1st Lt Steffanie David at the e-mail addresses identified in paragraph 2 above.

Attachment:

Past Performance Questionnaire Attachment 8

PAST/PRESENT PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

When filled in this document is source selection sensitive information iaw FAR 2.101 and 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT INFORMATION

K: Location(s) of Performance: ______________________________________________________ L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel M. Is there a Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)? ________________________________________________

SECTION 2: RESPONDENT’S INFORMATION

D. Respondent’s Telephone Number: _________________________________________________ E. Respondent’s E-mail Address: ____________________________________________________ F. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on identified contract: ___________

SECTION 3: EVALUATION

A. PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:

1. Did the contractor provide the following services?

Recruited, qualified, managed and retained aircrew consisting of 20 or more full time equivalent (FTE) positions? o Yes o No

Recruited, qualified, managed and retained aircrew consisting of 15 or more full time equivalent (FTE) positions? o Yes o No Recruited, qualified, managed and retained aircrew consisting of 10 or more full time equivalent (FTE) positions? ? o Yes o No Recruited, qualified, managed and retained aircrew and support staff consisting of less than 10 FTE positions? o Yes o No

2. Did the contractor provide flight services for the following Agencies with the number of sorties provided monthly?

Provided flight services for Special Operations Forces (SOF), DoD, or other Federal agencies with 50 or more sorties provided monthly? o Yes o No

Provided flight services for DoD, or other Federal agencies with 30 or more sorties provided monthly? Yes No Provided flight services for DoD, or other Federal agencies with 20 or more sorties provided monthly? Yes No Provided flight services for DoD, or other Federal agencies with less than 20 sorties provided monthly? Yes No

3. Did the contractor provide flight operations as follows?

Performed Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) flight operations or training in actual aircraft? Yes No

Performed flight operations or training in actual aircraft? Yes No Performed flight operations or aircrew and support staffing services? Yes No Did not perform flight operations or aircrew and support staffing services? Yes No

B. Please indicate your ratings for the contractor’s performance in Table 2, Performance Information using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Table 1: Rating Definitions RATING SCALE: Please use the following ratings to answer the questions on the following page Rating Definition Exceptional (E) Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

(VG)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Satisfactory (S) Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal (M) Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory (U) Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Neutral (N) No record exists.

Not Applicable (N/A) Not applicable should be used if the ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation NOTE: For statements indicating less than “Satisfactory”, please provide a brief explanation in the comments section of the survey.

C. In the tables below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Table 2: Performance Information Performance Questions E V S M N U N/A

1. How well did the contractor provide experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements?

SUPPORTING INFORMATION:

Performance Questions E V S M N U N/A

2. How well did the contractor delegate authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements?

3. How well did the contractor recruit, qualify, hire, retain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period without degradation in services?

4. How well did the contractor minimize personnel turnover so that it did not adversely affect contractor performance?

5. How effective was employee compensation towards quality of work?

6. How well did the contractor provide coverage during personnel absences, such as sickness, vacation, attrition, etc.?

7. How well did the contractor transition/mobilize after contract award? Was the contractor ready to perform on the first day of the performance period? Did the contractor experience start-up problems?

8. How well did the contractor perform tasks in accordance with schedule requirements?

9. How well did the contractor provide submittal requirements? Were invoices, reports, and other required documentation submitted clearly, correctly, and timely?

V S M N U N/A

10. How well did the contractor manage the quality and effectiveness of sub-contractor efforts, if any?

11. How well did the contractor identify problems as they occurred prior to Government identification?

12. How well did the contractor provide timely resolution of contract discrepancies?

13. How reasonable and cooperative was the contractor when dealing with program staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)?

14. How well did the Corporate office participate in solving significant local problems?

15. How well did the contractor effectively coordinate and communicate with customer(s) and/or Government personnel?

16. How well did the contractor meet the safety requirements of the contract?

17. How well was the contractor able to perform contract requirements with minimal or no direction from the Government or requiring organization?

V S M N U N/A

18. How would you rate the contractor’s overall performance of the contract?

19. FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was the contractor ever issued a cure notice, or a show cause notice under the reference contract? o Yes o No

If yes, please explain: _____________________________________________________________

20. FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Has the decision ever been made not to exercise an option due to contractor’s performance? o Yes o No

If yes, please explain: ______________________________________________________________

21. FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS ONLY: Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations? Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

o Yes o Terminated for Default/Cause o Terminated for Convenience o No If yes, please explain__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

22. Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired. You may include information on any other contracts with the contractor that you believe are relevant to this source selection.

SECTION 4: GENERAL COMMENT

Given what I know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what he promised in his proposal, I WOULD/WOULD NOT award another contract him today given that I had a choice.

Evaluator’s Signature: _____________________________________________________________

Printed Name of Evaluator: _______________________________________Date:______________

Please email this completed “Present and Past Performance Questionnaire” directly to Mr. Todd Martinez, E-mail: todd.martinez.1@us.af.mil