FBO_COMBO_for_Cultural_Resource_Survey.pdf

PDF 59 KB Posted

Attached to
Architectural Resources Survey
Solicitation number
F2V3F96062AW01
Issued by

About this file

Request for quotes

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
DFARS_252.209-7992.pdf PDF
Facilities_66-70_Feb2016.pdf PDF
SOW_Bldg_Survey_2015.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

REQUEST FOR QUOTE

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial services prepared in accordance with the format in FAR Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional information included in this notice.

This announcement constitutes the only solicitation; quotes are being requested and a written solicitation will NOT be issued. This is a Request for Quote (RFQ) and the solicitation number for this requirement is F2V3F96062AW01. The 6th Contracting Squadron, MacDill AFB, Florida, requires an Architectural Resources Survey.

I. DESCRIPTION OF REQUIREMENT:

The solicitation document and incorporated provisions and clauses are those in effect through Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005-87 Effective 06 Apr 2016, DFARS DPN 20160325 Effective 25 Mar 2016 , and AFARS Revision #26, 07 Apr 2016. The North American Industry Classification System code (NAICS) is 541370, with a Small Business Size Standard of 15.0M Employees.

II. DELIVERY ADDRESS: 6th Civil Engineer Squadron

7621 Hillsborough Loop Dr.

MacDill AFB, Fl 33621

III. PRICING SCHEDULE:

CLIN Description Qty. Unit Amount

0001 Architectural Resources Survey Conservation 1 Lot $

TOTAL $

Specific Instructions:

a. IAW FAR 52.219-6, this acquisition is a Total Small Business Set-Aside.

b. All offerors are required to complete and submit Attachment #2 of this solicitation IAW 252.209-7991, Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law.

IV. BASIS FOR AWARD: Reference 52.212-2, Evaluation -- Commercial Items

V. PROVISIONS/CLAUSES: Provisions and clauses may be obtained via the internet through the following websites: http://farsite.hill.af.mil, http://www.arnet.gov/far/, or http://safaq.hq.af.mil/contracting.

The following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provisions and clauses apply to this solicitation and are incorporated by reference:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_000.htm#P1511_210112 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/ http://www.arnet.gov/far/ http://safaq.hq.af.mil/contracting

- FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management

- FAR 52.204-13, System for Award Management

- FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors -- Commercial Items

- FAR 52.212-3, Offeror Representation and Certifications--Commercial Items

- FAR 52.212-4, Contract Terms and Conditions--Commercial Items

- FAR 52.212-5, Contract Terms and Conditions Required to Implement Statutes Or Executive Orders--Commercial Items

- FAR 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations

- FAR 52.219-6, Notice of Total Small Business Set-Aside

- FAR 52.222-99, Establishing a Minimum Wage for Contractors

- FAR 52.223-10, Waste Reduction Program

- FAR 52.232-40, Providing Accelerated Payments to Small Business Subcontractors

- FAR 52.246-16, Responsibility for Supplies

- FAR 52.247-34, F.O.B Destination

- FAR 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference

- FAR 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by Reference

Within FAR 52.212-5, the following provisions and clauses are incorporated by text:

-FAR 52.204-10, Reporting Executive Compensation and First-Tier Subcontract Awards -FAR 52.209-6, Protecting the Governments Interest When Subcontracting with Contractors Debarred, Suspended, or Proposed for Debarment -FAR 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation -FAR 52.222-3, Convict Labor -FAR 52.222-21, Prohibition of Segregated Facilities -FAR 52.222-26, Equal Opportunity -FAR 52.222-36, Equal Opportunity for Workers With Disabilities -FAR 52.222-41, Service Contract Labor Standards -FAR 52.222-42, Statement of Equivalent Rates for Federal Hires -FAR 52.222-50, Combating Trafficking in Persons -FAR 52.223-18, Encouraging Contractor Policies to Ban Text Messaging While Driving -FAR 52.232-33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer--System for Award Management

- FAR 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations

- FAR 52.219-28, Post-Award Small Business Program Rerepresentation

The following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provisions and clauses apply to this solicitation and are incorporated by full text:

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1, INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS—COMMERCIAL

ITEMS SOLICITATION PROVISIONS

The following additions/changes are made to FAR provision 52.212-1, which is incorporated by reference:

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/52_232.htm#P998_183599

(1) All offers must list your DUNS number, CAGE code, and Federal TIN with Company name, POC, and phone number. If you need to obtain or renew a DUNS number or CAGE code, please visit https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/.

Lack of registration in the SAM database will make an offeror ineligible for award. Vendor must also be registered in Wide Area Work Flow to receive payment through electronic funds transfer. If you are not currently registered, please visit the following website https://wawf.eb.mil/ to complete your registration.

(2) The North American Industry Classification System code (NAICS) is 541370, with a Small Business Size Standard of 15.0M

(3) Requests for clarification. Address any questions or concerns you have to the CO or CA. Written requests for clarification may be sent by e-mail to leila.sulaimon@us.af.mil or ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil. All requests for clarification/questions are due no later than 04 May 2016 at 10:00 AM Eastern Standard Time.

(4) Receipt of offerors. Offers are due no later than 11 May 2016 at 10:00 AM Eastern Standard Time to the 6th Contracting Squadron, 2610 Pink Flamingo Avenue, Building 147, MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5119. No faxed offers will be accepted. The offeror is solely responsible to make sure their offers are received by the deadline.

(5) “Notice to Offeror(s)/Supplier(s): No award will be made under this solicitation until funds are available. The Government reserves the right to cancel this solicitation, either before or after the closing date. In the event the Government cancels this solicitation, the Government has no obligation to reimburse an offeror for any costs.”

Information to Offerors and Instructions for Offer Preparation

1.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

a. This section provides general guidance as well as specific instructions on the format and content of an offerors submissions. The offeror’s submission must include all data and information requested and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions.

The offer shall be compliant with the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work

(SOW).

b. Offers shall be clear, concise, and shall provide a Performance Plan (Volume II) with sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror’s submission.

https://www.sam.gov/portal/public/SAM/ https://wawf.eb.mil/ mailto:leila.sulaimon@us.af.mil mailto:ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil

1.1 GENERAL INFORMATION

1.1.1 Point of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Administrator (CA) are the sole points of contact for this acquisition.

Government Point of Contact: Leila Sulaimon, USAF, Contracting Specialist leila.sulaimon@us.af.mil (813)828-7467

Government Alternate Point of Contact: Ramon Jimenez, USAF, Contracting Officer ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil (813)828-7483

1.1.2 Discrepancies – If an offeror believes the requirements in these instructions contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the CO in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial submissions, as received, without discussion.

1.2 ORGANIZATION/NUMBER OF COPIES/PAGE LIMITS

The offeror shall prepare submissions as set forth in the organizational table below. The titles and contents of the volumes are defined in the below table, all of which shall be within the required page limits and with the number of copies shown below.

Submission Organization

VOLUME VOLUME CONTENTS COPIES PAGE LIMIT

I Contract Documentation, Cost/Price

One (1) Copy No Limit

II Technical Approach One (1) Copy 10 Pages III Past Performance One (1) Copy 5 Pages

1.2.1 Cost or Pricing Information – All cost or pricing information shall be addressed ONLY in Volume I. Information shall be limited to Contract Line Item Number (CLIN), including unit and extended pricing, as specified in Sec. III above.

1.2.2 Distribution – Offers shall be addressed to the Contract Specialist and mailed to: 6th Contracting Squadron, 2610 Pink Flamingo Ave., MacDill AFB, FL 33621-5119 or by email to the CA and CO identified above.

(End of clause)

52.212-2, Evaluation -- Commercial Items

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, mailto:leila.sulaimon@us.af.mil mailto:ramon.jimenez.7@us.af.mil price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

1) Price

2) Technical

3) Past Performance

Evaluation Process

First, the Government will arrange all quotes conforming to the solicitation by Total Evaluated Price (TEP) from lowest to highest. Prices will be evaluated (in order by price) using the price analysis techniques described below (Sec. (d)(i)(1)). If the lowest priced offerors price is determined to be unreasonable, the Government will deem that offeror ineligble for award and move on to the next lowest priced offeror.

Secondly, the Government will evaluate the technical approach of the eligible lowest priced offeror and assign a rating of either “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable”. If the eligible lowest priced offeror receives a technical rating of “Unacceptbale”, the Government evaluation team will evaluate the next eligible offeror (in order by price) until an “Acceptable” rating is achieved or until all offerors are evaluated. If all offerors are evaluated and no “Acceptable” technical rating is achieved, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with offerors (in order by eligible lowest price) and may award to a lower rated offeror.

If the eligible lowest priced offeror receives an “Acceptable” technical rating, the Government will evaluate that offerors past performance. If the eligible lowest priced offeror is evaluated to have an “Acceptable” past performance rating, award shall be made to that offeror without further consideration of any other offers. If the eligible lowest priced offeror is determined to have an “Unacceptable” past performance rating, the Government evaluation team will evaluate the next eligible lowest priced offeror (with an “Acceptable” technical rating) until an “Acceptable” past performance rating is achieved or until all offerors are evaluated. If all offerors are evaluated and no “Acceptable” past performance rating is achieved, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions with offerors (in order by eligible lowest price) and may award to a lower rated offeror.

Price – Received quotes will be ranked and arranged by price (lowest first) before the Government assesses technical capability. For the purpose of evaluation and to establish price fair and reasonableness, the Government will evaluate an offerors quoted price utlizing one or more of the following techniques (IAW FAR 15.404-1(b)):

- Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation

- Comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid, whether by the Government or other than the Government, for the same or similar services

- Use of parametric estimating methods/application of rough yardsticks (such as dollars per pound or per horsepower, or other units) to highlight significant inconsistencies that warrant additional pricing inquiry

- Comparison with competitive published price lists, published market prices of commodities, similar indexes, and discount or rebate arrangements

- Comparison of proposed prices with independent Government cost estimates

- Comparison of proposed prices with prices obtained through market research for the same or similar items

- Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data (as defined at FAR 2.101) provided by the offeror

(1) The Government may deem any quote “ineligible”, when evaluation (IAW FAR 15.404-1(b)) of an offerors TEP refelcts an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity of the program (i.e. terms of program commitments, contract terms and conditions, or high or low in cost).

(2) Quoted prices shall be fully burdened inclusive of all direct and indirect costs (e.g., profit, fringe benefits, salary, indirect rates and overtime hours). The total of CLINs will be evaluated for completeness and accuracy, and used for total evaluated price. Round all prices up to the nearest penny.

Technical - All offerors must provide specific evidence (Volume II) that they are capable of fulfilling the requirement. Specific evidence must reflect a thorough understanding of the Statement of Work (SOW) and describe how the offeror will fulfill requirements of the SOW (Performance Plan). Technical criteria will be evaluated by a technical evaluation team and rated IAW Table A-1 (as provided below). Documents submitted in response to this solicitation must be fully responsive to and consistent with the following (if applicable): (1) Requirements of the solicitation; (2) Statement of Work (SOW); and (3) government standards and regulations pertaining to this requirement.

Past Performance - Offerors must provide (as part of Volume III) a list of no less/more than two (2), of the most recent and relevant contracts performed for Federal agencies and commercial customers. Offerors who provide less than 2 will be deemed non-responsive. Only the first 2 identified contracts will be evaluated. The government will evaluate the quality and extent of offeror’s performance deemed relevant to the requirements of the SOW. The evaluation of past performance information will take into account past performance information regarding predecessor companies, key personnel (if applicable) who have relevant experience, or subcontractors that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement when such

Table A-1. Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Ratings Rating Description

Acceptable Technical Approach clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation/SOW.

Unacceptable Technical Approach does not clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation/SOW.

http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_603 information is relevant to this acquisition. The Government will use the following recency and relevancy definitions when assessing recent and relevant contracts:

(i) Recency Assessment: An assessment of the past performance information will be made to determine if it is recent. To be recent, the effort must be ongoing or must have been performed during the past five (5) years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. Past performance information that fails this condition will result in a past performance confidence rating of “Unacceptable”.

(ii) Relevancy Assessment: As described in Table A-2 below, the Government will conduct an in-depth evaluation of all recent performance information obtained to determine how closely the provided products/services performed under those contracts relate to the SOW provided and assign a rating of “Relevant or “Not Relevant. A relevancy determination of the offeror’s past performance will be made based upon the aforementioned considerations, including joint venture partner(s) and major and critical subcontractor(s).In determining relevancy for individual contracts, consideration will be given to the effort, or portion of the effort, being proposed by the offeror, teaming partner, or subcontractor whose contract is being reviewed and evaluated. Past performance information deemed “Not Relevant” will result in a past performance confidence rating of “Unacceptable”.

TABLE A-2 - RELEVANCY ASSESSMENTS

Rating Definition RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the SOW.

NOT RELEVANT Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities described in the SOW.

Past Performance will be evaluated using the ratings identified in Table A-3- Performance Confidence Assessments.

Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are equal to Price.

TABLE A-3 - PERFORMANCE CONFIDENCE ASSESSMENTS

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s past performance provided as part of their quote, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s past performance provided as part of their quote, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

(b) Before the offer’s specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of Provision)

The following Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation (DFAR) provisions and clauses apply to this solicitation and are incorporated by reference:

-DFARS 252.203-7000, Requirements Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials -DFARS 252.203-7002, Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights -DFARS 252.203-7005, Representation Relating to Compensation of Former DoD Officials -DFARS 252.204-7003, Control of Government Personnel Work Product -DFARS 252.204-7004 Alt A, System for Award Management Alternate A -DFARS 252-204-7012, Safeguarding of Unclassified Controlled Technical Information -DFARS 252.209-7992, Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax . Liability or a Felony Conviction under and Federal Law is required -DFARS 252.225-7001, Buy American Act and Balance of Payment Program -DFARS 252.225-7002, Qualifying Country Sources as Subcontractors -DFARS 252.204-7008, Compliance with Safeguarding Covered Defense Information Controls -DFARS 252.225-7036, Buy American—Free Trade Agreements—Balance of Payments . Program -DFARS 252.232-7003, Electronic Submission of Payment Requests -DFARS 252.232-7010, Levies on Contract Payments -DFARS 252.243-7001, Pricing of Contract Modifications -DFARS 252.247-7023 Alt III, Transportation of Supplies by Sea

The following Air Force Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (AFFARS) clause applies and is incorporated in full text:

AFFARS, Health and Safety on Government Installations (NOV 2012)

(a) In performing work under this contract on a Government installation, the contractor shall:

(1) Take all reasonable steps and precautions to prevent accidents and preserve the health and safety of contractor and Government personnel performing or in any way coming in contact with the performance of this contract; and

(2) Take such additional immediate precautions as the contracting officer may reasonably require for health and safety purposes.

(b) The contracting officer may, by written order, direct Air Force Occupational Safety and Health (AFOSH) Standards and/or health/safety standards as may be required in the performance of this contract and any adjustments resulting from such direction will be in accordance with the Changes clause of this contract.

(c) Any violation of these health and safety rules and requirements, unless promptly corrected as directed by the contracting officer, shall be grounds for termination of this contract in accordance with the Default clause of this contract.

AFFARS, 5352.242-9000 Contractor Access to Air Force Installations (NOV 2012)

(a) The contractor shall obtain base identification and vehicle passes, if required, for all contractor personnel who make frequent visits to or perform work on the Air Force installation(s) cited in the contract. Contractor personnel are required to wear or prominently display installation identification badges or contractor-furnished, contractor identification badges while visiting or performing work on the installation.

(b) The contractor shall submit a written request on company letterhead to the contracting officer listing the following: contract number, location of work site, start and stop dates, and names of employees and subcontractor employees needing access to the base. The letter will also specify the individual(s) authorized to sign for a request for base identification credentials or vehicle passes. The contracting officer will endorse the request and forward it to the issuing base pass and registration office or Security Forces for processing. When reporting to the registration office, the authorized contractor individual(s) should provide a valid driver’s license, current vehicle registration, and valid vehicle insurance certificate to obtain a vehicle pass.

(c) During performance of the contract, the contractor shall be responsible for obtaining required identification for newly assigned personnel and for prompt return of credentials and vehicle passes for any employee who no longer requires access to the work site.

(d) When work under this contract requires unescorted entry to controlled or restricted areas, the contractor shall comply with AFI 31-101, Integrated Defense, and AFI 31-501, Personnel Security Program Management as applicable.

(e) Upon completion or termination of the contract or expiration of the identification passes, the prime contractor shall ensure that all base identification passes issued to employees and subcontractor employees are returned to the issuing office.

(f) Failure to comply with these requirements may result in withholding of final payment.

AFFARS 5352.201-9101, Ombudsman (APR 2014)

(a) An ombudsman has been appointed to hear and facilitate the resolution of concerns from offerors, potential offerors, and others for this acquisition. When requested, the ombudsman will maintain strict confidentiality as to the source of the concern. The existence of the ombudsman does not affect the authority of the program manager, contracting officer, or source selection official. Further, the ombudsman does not participate in the evaluation of proposals, the source selection process, or the adjudication of protests or formal contract disputes. The ombudsman may refer the interested party to another official who can resolve the concern.

(b) Before consulting with an ombudsman, interested parties must first address their concerns, issues, disagreements, and/or recommendations to the contracting officer for resolution.

Consulting an ombudsman does not alter or postpone the timelines for any other processes (e.g., agency level bid protests, GAO bid protests, requests for debriefings, employee-employer actions, contests of OMB Circular A-76 competition performance decisions).

http://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4_7/publication/afi31-101/releasibility_for_afi31-101.pdf http://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a4_7/publication/afi31-501/afi31-501.pdf http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_a076_a76_incl_tech_correction/

(c) If resolution cannot be made by the contracting officer, the interested party may contact the ombudsman, [Insert names, addresses, telephone numbers, facsimile numbers, and e-mail addresses of Center/MAJCOM/DRU/HQ AFICA/AFRCO/SMC ombudsman/ombudsmen].

Concerns, issues, disagreements, and recommendations that cannot be resolved at the Center/MAJCOM/DRU/HQ AFICA/SMC ombudsman level, may be brought by the interested party for further consideration to the Air Force ombudsman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary (ADAS) (Contracting), SAF/AQC, 1060 Air Force Pentagon, Washington DC 20330- 1060, phone number (571) 256-2395, facsimile number (571) 256-2431.

(d) The ombudsman has no authority to render a decision that binds the agency.

(e) Do not contact the ombudsman to request copies of the solicitation, verify offer due date, or clarify technical requirements. Such inquiries shall be directed to the Contracting Officer.

Attachments:

1. List of known Bldgs.

2. DFARS 252.209-7992, Representation by Corporations Regarding an Unpaid Delinquent Tax . Liability or a Felony Conviction under any Federal Law

3. Statement of Work

4. WD 05-2125 (Rev.-21)

1.1.1 Point of Contact – The Contracting Officer (CO) and Contract Administrator (CA) are the sole
points of contact for this acquisition.
Government Point of Contact: Leila Sulaimon, USAF, Contracting Specialist
leila.sulaimon@us.af.mil (813)828-7467
Evaluation Process
- Analysis of data other than certified cost or pricing data (as defined at FAR 2.101) provided by the offeror
(1) The Government may deem any quote “ineligible”, when evaluation (IAW FAR 15.404-1(b)) of an offerors TEP refelcts an inherent lack of competence or failure to comprehend the complexity of the program (i.e. terms of program commitments, contract te...

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .