F_Responsibility Inquiry~1.pdf

PDF 678 KB Posted

Attached to
OAHP Valuation Methodology
Solicitation number
S-69100-00004217
Issued by
Marion County, Oregon

About this file

This document is an "Attachment F - Responsibility Inquiry" from the Oregon Department of Administrative Services (DAS) Procurement Services regarding a state contract opportunity to develop a methodology to value ecosystem services for the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). The inquiry form requires the bidder to provide information about their financial, material, equipment, facility, and personnel resources and expertise; their past performance on similar contracts; any criminal or civil charges; contract terminations or lawsuits; outstanding judgments, financial distress, or cash flow issues; bankruptcy filings; required licenses and authorizations; and possession of a current Pay Equity Certificate. The contract opportunity is for the "OAHP Methodology to Value Ecosystem Services" project in Marion County and the City of Salem, Oregon.

The contract seeks to compensate agricultural landowners for engaging in conservation practices, and the selected contractor will be responsible for developing the methodology to value those ecosystem services. The document does not provide specifics on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements and sources, or other salient commercial information.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S-69100-00004217 - OAHP METHODOLOGY TO VALUE ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (010-23-22429) Att F

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – February 20, 2019 Page 1 of 3

ATTACHMENT F - RESPONSIBILITY INQUIRY

Agency will determine responsibility of a Bidder prior to award and execution of a Contract. In addition to this form, Agency may notify Bidder of other documentation required, which may include but is not limited to recent profit-and-loss history, current balance statements and cash flow information, assets-to-liabilities ratio, including number and amount of secured versus unsecured creditor claims, availability of short and long-term financing, bonding capacity, insurability, credit information, materials and equipment, facility capabilities, personnel information, record of performance under previous contracts, etc. Failure to promptly provide requested information or clearly demonstrate responsibility may result in an Agency finding of non-responsibility and rejection.

1. Does Bidder have available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel resources and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to demonstrate the capability of Bidder to meet all contractual responsibilities? YES / NO .

2. Within the last five years, how many contracts of a similar nature has Bidder completed that, to the extent that the costs associated with and time available to perform the contract remained within Bidder′s control, Bidder stayed within the time and budget allotted, and there were no contract claims by any party?

Number: ____

How many contracts did not meet those standards? Number: ____ If any, please explain.

Response:

3. Within the last three years has Bidder (incl. a partner or shareholder owning 10% or more of Bidder’s firm) or a major subcontractor (receiving 10% or more of a total contract amount) been criminally or civilly charged, indicted or convicted in connection with:

obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, state, or local) contract or subcontract, violation of federal or state antitrust statutes relating to the submission of bids, or embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, or receiving stolen property? YES / NO .

If "YES," indicate the jurisdiction, date of indictment, charge or judgment, and names and summary of charges in the response field below.

Response:

4. Within the last three years, has Bidder had:

any contracts terminated for default by any government agency, or any lawsuits filed against it by creditors or involving contract disputes? YES / NO .

If "YES," please explain. (With regard to judgments, include jurisdiction and date of final judgment or dismissal.)

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – February 20, 2019 Page 2 of 3

Response:

5. Does Bidder have any outstanding or pending judgments against it? YES / NO .

Is Bidder experiencing financial distress or having difficulty securing financing? YES / NO .

Does Bidder have sufficient cash flow to fund day-to-day operations throughout the proposed contract period? YES / NO

If "YES” on the first question or second question, or “NO” on the third question, please provide additional details.

Response:

6. Within the last three years, has Bidder filed a bankruptcy action, filed for reorganization, made a general assignment of assets for the benefit of creditors, or had an action for insolvency instituted against it? YES

/ NO .

If "YES," indicate the filing dates, jurisdictions, type of action, ultimate resolution, and dates of judgment or dismissal, if applicable.

Response:

7. Does Bidder have all required licenses, insurance and/or registrations, if any, and is Bidder legally authorized to do business in the State of Oregon? YES /NO .

If "NO," please explain.

Response:

8. Pay Equity Certificate. Does a current authorized representative of Bidder possess an unexpired Pay Equity Certificate issued by the Department of Administrative Services? YES / NO / N/A . [If the certificate was provided with the Bid submitted for a solicitation related to the prospective contract, then it is not necessary to resubmit it. Just indicate “see Bid” in the response field. Otherwise, if applicable, submit a copy of the certificate with this form.]

Response:

AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

By signature below, the undersigned Authorized Representative on behalf of Bidder certifies to the best of his or her knowledge and believes the responses provided on this form are complete, accurate, and not misleading.

Bidder Name: ITB:

DAS Procurement Services, Version 1.0 – February 20, 2019 Page 3 of 3

Project Name:

Authorized Signature Date

Print Name Title

NO: Off
undefined: Off
Number:
How many contracts did not meet those standards Number:
Response:
NO_2: Off
undefined_2: Off
Response_2:
NO_3: Off
undefined_3: Off
Response_3:
NO_4: Off
undefined_4: Off
NO_5: Off
undefined_5: Off
Does Bidder have sufficient cash flow to fund daytoday operations throughout the proposed contract: Off
NO_6: Off
Response_4:
NO_7: Off
undefined_6: Off
Response_5:
NO_8: Off
undefined_7: Off
Response_6:
NO_9: Off
NA: Off
undefined_8: Off
Response_7:
Bidder Name:
ITB:
Project Name:
Date:
Print Name:
Title:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .