Exhibit F - Bidder Reference Scoring.pdf
PDF 135 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- RFP PC236521
- Issued by
- King County, Kingston CDP, Washington
About this file
This document is Exhibit E - Bidder References Past Performance Questionnaire from the Washington State Patrol (WSP) for evaluating contractor performance on state contracts. The questionnaire is designed to collect detailed information about a contractor's past performance through reference checks, including background information about the reference organization and specific contract details such as award date, contract number, type, value, term and scope of work.
The evaluation portion consists of a comprehensive scoring system across multiple performance categories rated on a 1-10 scale from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Key evaluation areas include quality of work, adherence to delivery schedules, problem-solving initiative, responsiveness to technical direction, capability to handle urgent requirements, documentation accuracy, invoice submission, and key personnel effectiveness. The form also asks whether the contractor has received any cure notices or performance correction directives, and whether the reference would select the firm again. Completed questionnaires are to be returned directly to the WSP Procurement Specialist.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Exhibit E Diverse Business Inclusion Plan.pdf | ||
| Sole_Source_Notification_20250483.pdf | ||
| Exhibit B - Performance Requirements.pdf | ||
| Exhibit D - Purchase Agreement.pdf | ||
| WSP RFP PC236521.pdf.crdownload | CRDOWNLOAD file | |
| Exhibit A-1-Bidders Certification.pdf | ||
| Exhibit C - Bid Price.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| WSP RFP PC236521.pdf | ||
| Exhibit A-2-Bidders Profile.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Exhibit E
Bidder References – Past Performance Questionnaire
Contractor:
Part 1: Background
A. Reference – Respondent Information
• Organization:
• Address:
• Name:
• Title:
• Telephone number:
• Email Address:
B. Contract Identification
• Contract/Solicitation award date:
• Contract number:
• Contract/Solicitation type:
• Contract/Solicitation value:
• Contract/Solicitation term:
• Scope of Work/Description of Services
Part 2: Evaluation
Exceptional- Contractor's performance significantly exceeded most or all contract requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective action taken by the Contractor was highly effective.
Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective action taken by the Contractor was effective.
Marginal- Performance meets most contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective action or the Contractor's proposed action appears to be effective or has not been fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the Contractor's corrective action appears or was ineffective.
A. Quality of work/compliance with specification requirements
Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Exceptional
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
B. Adherence to delivery schedule/timeliness of product deliverables
Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Exceptional
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
C. Initiative in Solving Contract problems / Ability to solve contract performance issues without extensive guidance from government personnel
D. Responsiveness to Technical Direction / Contract Changes
E. Responsiveness / Capability to respond to urgent / short term requirements
F. Accuracy of Reports / Documentation
G. Submission of accurate and complete invoices
H. Effectiveness / Reliability / Responsiveness of Contractor Key Personnel
I. Has the Contractor ever been issued a cure notice, a show cause notice, suspension of progress payments, or other letters directing the correction of performance problem?
(please circle answer)
YES NO
If yes, please explain:
J. Based on the Contractor's overall performance, would you select this firm again?
YES NO
If no, please explain:
K. General Comments - Please provide any additional relevant performance information
Respondent Signature: Date: _
Part 3: Return Information
Please return the completed questionnaire directly to:
Pennie.clark@wsp.wa.gov
Procurement Specialist Washington State Patrol Phone: 360-704-5456 mailto:Pennie.clark@wsp.wa.gov
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .