Exhibit C - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf
PDF 343 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24425R0102
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 4 in Pittsburgh, PA, for a contract numbered 503-24-104 to Enclose Pharmacy AHU D/B. The document is a comprehensive evaluation form designed for reference contacts to provide detailed feedback on a contractor's past performance across multiple dimensions, including quality of management and workmanship, timeliness, adherence to schedule, business practices, customer relationship, compliance, safety, and overall customer satisfaction.
The questionnaire requires reference contacts to rate the contractor on a scale from 0 (Neutral) to 5 (Exceptional) across 20 specific performance criteria, such as technical abilities, quality control, schedule adherence, problem-solving, safety compliance, and infection control. The form must be completed and submitted via email to Amy.Demarest@va.gov and Christopher.McDevitt@va.gov by 11:30 am EST in September 2025. The evaluation covers aspects like the contractor's ability to manage personnel, meet contract requirements, respond to inquiries, handle subcontractors, and overall performance, with space provided for detailed remarks and a final recommendation on whether the agency would award another contract to the contractor.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department of Veterans Affairs Network Contracting Office 4
1010 Delafield Road Pittsburgh, PA 15215
1 | P a g e
Past Performance Questionnaire for:
503-24-104 Enclose Pharmacy AHU D/B
INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFEROR
Complete the CONTRACTOR INFORMATION section, below (type answers into light blue shaded boxes). Save the document. Send an electronic or hard copy print of the form to each of your reference contacts, asking them to please complete the form and submit it according to the instructions, below.
Company Name Street Address
Point of Contact (POC) City
POC Phone Number State Reference Project Title Zip Code
Contract Period of Performance (start to finish):
Contract Number Contract Dollar Value
Description of Work
Role of Contractor on This Project (check appropriate box)
Prime Contractor Sub-contractor Key Personnel
INSTRUCTIONS TO REFERENCE CONTACT
The contractor named above is submitting a proposal for a United States Department of Veterans Affairs contract, and has sent this form to you as a past performance reference contact. Please complete the following pages in full (all areas shaded in light yellow, below). Once completed, please send the form to the Contracting Officer via email directly to:
Amy.Demarest@va.gov and Christopher.McDevitt@va.gov
Please return the completed form ASAP, but no later than 11:30 am EST, XX September 2025.
If you have any questions, please contact the Contracting Officer: Amy.Demarest@va.gov
RESPONDENT INFORMATION [completed by Reference Contact]
Company Name Street Address
POC Name City
Phone Number State
Email Zip Code
PERFORMANCE INFORMATION: Choose the number on the scale of 0 (Neutral) to 5 (Exceptional) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION FOR THE OVERALL RATING in the Remarks section, below.
0 1 2 3 4 5
NEUTRAL UNACCEPTABLE MARGINAL ACCEPTABLE VERY GOOD OUTSTANDING
No record of past performance, or not applicable or the record is inconclusive.
Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements.
There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective.
Performance met most contractual requirements.
There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Performance met all contract requirements and exceeded some to the government’s benefit. There were a few minor problems, which the contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.
Performance exceeded all contract requirements. There were no problems.
The Contractor … 0 1 2 3 4 5
QUALITY – MANAGEMENT & WORKMANSHIP
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2. Demonstrated ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified construction personnel during the contract period.
3. Provided and followed approved quality control plan and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
4. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
5. Submittals clearly identified the proposed item IAW the specifications and drawings.
6. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
TIMELINESS AND ADHERENCE TO SCHEDULE
0 1 2 3 4 5
7.
Contractor provided timely notices of possible delays/schedule revisions.
REMARKS:
8.
Timeliness in submitting submittals and reports and responding to agency inquiries, RFP's, etc.
9. Developed realistic and met approved progress schedules.
BUSINESS PRACTICES/CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP AND ABILITY TO PERFORM
10.
Displayed initiative to solve problems.
11.
How well did the contractor work independent of Government guidance, oversight and assistance?
12.
Subcontractors / tradesmen were adequately managed and coordinated. Explain any subcontracting issues (positive or negative) that impacted the performance of your contract(s).
13. For contract changes, contractor provided timely and realistic change order proposals.
COMPLIANCE & SAFETY
0 1 2 3 4 5
14. Reports (i.e., daily, test, logs) / records were submitted completely and accurately satisfy the requirement.
15.
Applicable to Federal Contracts –Contractor complied with applicable Federal Laws and Regulations such as Construction Wage Rate Requirements – timely payrolls and compliance; Drug-Free Workplace; Environmental Regulations and Use of Recovered Materials; Executive Order 13101 Greening the Government.
16.
Contractor’s safety program was in compliance with federal regulations. Contractor implemented and followed their safety plan and ran a “safe jobsite”.
INFECTION CONTROL
17.
Contractor had an Infection Control Process in place and complied with agency Infection Control Requirements.
REMARKS:
OVERALL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
18. Demonstrated reasonableness in modifications cost proposal.
19. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES NO
20. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, please explain in “remarks.”
YES NO
OVERALL PERFORMANCE RATING:
REMARKS (Please use as much space as is needed – the box will expand as you type).
I hereby certify that the information that I have reported above is accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Printed Name E-mail address
Business Title Signature Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .