_Exhibit_B_Qualifications _2025-05.docx

DOCX document 24 KB Posted

Attached to
Special Education Complaint Investigator
Solicitation number
RFQ 2025-05
Issued by
Adams County, Asotin County, Benton County, Chelan County, Clallam County, Clark County, Columbia County, Cowlitz County, Douglas County, Ferry County, Franklin County, Garfield County, Grant County, Grays Harbor County, Island County, Jefferson County, King County, Kitsap County, Kittitas County, Klickitat County, Lewis County, Lincoln County, Mason County, Okanogan County, Pacific County, Pend Oreille County, Pierce County, San Juan County, Skagit County, Skamania County, Snohomish County, Spokane County, Stevens County, Thurston County, Wahkiakum County, Walla Walla County, Whatcom County, Whitman County, Yakima County, Asotin City, Clarkston City, Clarkston Heights-Vineland CDP, West Clarkston-Highland CDP, Benton City, Chelan City, Chelan Falls CDP, Clallam Bay CDP, Lewisville CDP, Rock Island City, Pacific Beach CDP, Whidbey Island Station CDP, Mercer Island City, Pacific City, Bainbridge Island City, Kingston CDP, Kitsap Lake CDP, Kittitas City, Klickitat CDP, Okanogan City, Anderson Island CDP, Fort Lewis CDP, Fox Island CDP, Herron Island CDP, Ketron Island CDP, North Fort Lewis CDP, Raft Island CDP, Stevenson City, Hat Island CDP, Lake Stevens City, Snohomish City, Spokane City, Spokane Valley City, Puget Island CDP, Garfield Town, Yakima City, Washington

About this file

This document is an Exhibit B Qualification Affirmations for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) in the State of Washington. OSPI is seeking consultants to conduct up to four (4) complex confidential investigations per month filed against local education agencies (LEAs) through the formal special education community complaint process and to prepare written decisions for each investigation. The qualified consultants must meet minimum requirements such as being licensed to do business in Washington, having advanced understanding of IDEA and special education laws, and demonstrating investigation and communication skills.

The document also outlines additional desired qualifications, including being a member of the bar association, having strong written and oral communication skills, and a history of professional behavior. Consultants who do not meet the minimum qualifications will be rejected as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration. The contract period is not specified in the provided information.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
_Exhibit_A_Assurances_2025-05.docx DOCX document
RFQ_2025-05_Complaint_Investigator_FINAL.pdf PDF
Contract_Intake_Form_01.24.docx DOCX document
_Exhibit_F_Contract_Issues_List_2025-05.docx DOCX document
RFQ_2025-05_Addendum_01_Pre-Bid Final.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

EXHIBIT B

QUALIFICATION AFFIRMATIONS

CONSULTANT INFORMATION

Bidder:

MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS

Please check all boxes that apply.

|_| Licensed to do business in the State of Washington. If not licensed, provide a written intent to become licensed in Washington within thirty (30) calendar days of being selected as the Apparently Successful Contractor.

|_|Highly advanced understanding of IDEA, OSPI WAC 392-172A, and other applicable laws as documented by resume or curriculum vitae.

|_|Ability to analyze case law and IDEA Federal and State statutory and administrative law, policy and guidance, and apply to facts and circumstances of a particular situation as documented by resume, history of relevant professional development, and |_|At least three (3) professional letters of recommendation from references who can speak to the bidder’s knowledge of IDEA, special education, and investigation skills.

|_|Ability to complete investigation within the timelines set forth by the IDEA and OSPI as documented by resume or curriculum vitae, history of relevant professional development, and at least three (3) letters of recommendation.

|_|Awarded Vendor is not currently employed by a LEA or employed by an LEA at any point during the contract period.

Consultants who do not meet the minimum qualifications noted above will be rejected as non-responsive and will not receive further consideration. Any proposal that is rejected as non-responsive will not be evaluated or scored.

ADDITIONAL DESIRED QUALIFICATIONS

Please check all boxes that apply.

|_| Bar Association member in good standing.

Strong interpersonal written and oral communication skills that demonstrate accuracy, clarity, civility, and professionalism as demonstrated by the submission of an original sample complaint decision of two (2) pages or less detailing a fictitious complaint investigation and required corrective action.

|_| Ability to use computers, Microsoft Word, and email effectively and independently, as documented by resume or curriculum vitae.

|_| Strong interpersonal written and oral communication skills that demonstrate accuracy, clarity, civility, and professionalism as demonstrated by the submission of an original sample complaint decision of two (2) pages or less detailing a fictitious complaint investigation and required corrective action.

|_|History of professional behavior, including addressing concerns appropriately, arriving to scheduled meetings on time, and submitting quality written work in a timely manner, as documented by letters of recommendation and, if applicable, a review of previous work provided to OSPI.

I certify under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington that the foregoing is true and correct.

__ ________________________ _________________ ________________________
Signature of BidderDatePlace Signed (City, State)
__ ________________________ _________________ ________________________
Printed NameTitleOrganization Name

Qualification Affirmations | RFP No. 2025-05

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .