Exhibit 1 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 94 KB Posted

Attached to
Alaska Legacy and Abandoned Well Remediation
Solicitation number
140L0621R0006
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and instructions for a federal solicitation seeking proposals for Alaska legacy and abandoned well remediation services. Offerors are required to provide the completed questionnaire to at least three previous customers to evaluate the offeror's past performance by June 16, 2021. The Bureau of Land Management National Office will use the responses to assess offeror's performance on contracts involving similar well remediation work. The questionnaire requests details on prior contracts, including period of performance, description of work, subcontractors used, and ratings in categories like quality, cost control, and timeliness. Respondents are asked to score offerors using a rating scale of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, or unsatisfactory and provide comments to justify ratings. The solicitation number for the opportunity is 140L0621R0006.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Exhibit 1 AK Legacy & Abandoned Well Remediation Past Performance Questionnaire

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

NOTICE TO OFFERORS

Contained herein is the draft letter that the Contracting Officer will use to solicit past performance comments from those organizations or agencies that the offeror has identified in response to the solicitation requirements as well as the complete questionnaire that will be used.

The RFP, in the Proposal Submission Instructions, includes a past performance questionnaire for offerors to send their previous customers with instructions to return the completed questionnaire to the Government. Failure of the references to submit the completed questionnaires shall not be a cause for rejection of the proposal nor shall it be reflected in the Government's evaluation of the offeror's past performance.

Offerors are encouraged to submit the attached cover letter and questionnaire to their references and request the return of the questionnaire to the Contracting Officer as soon as possible prior to the established closing date of the solicitation. Offerors will have to complete the heading and paragraphs 1 through 4 of the questionnaire for each reference.

May 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Request for Performance Information

To Whom It May Concern:

You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. We are currently evaluating this company for award of a contract for a project entitled, “Alaska Abandoned & Legacy Well Remediation”.

It is requested that you complete the attached questionnaire providing detailed information on the performance history of the firm identified.

It is essential that this office receive your official response as soon as possible and not later than June 16, 2021, 8:00pm MOUNTAIN TIME. Please submit the completed questionnaire via email to: jrodmansnyder@blm.gov.

Signed, Jennifer Rodman-Snyder

Contracting Officer

1. Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number:

2. Contract Number(s):

3. Contract Value (Base plus Options):

4. Period of Performance:

5. Type of Contract(s) Used: (Check all that apply)

[ ]FP

[ ]FPI

[ ]CR

[ ]T&M

[ ]Labor Hour

[ ]8(a) [ ]Sealed Bid

[ ]Negotiated

[ ]TO/DO

[ ]SB Set-Aside [ ]Competitive

[ ]Non-Competitive

[ ]Requirements [ ]Supplies/Equipment

[ ]Services

[ ]Commercial Items

Acquisition

6. Description of Requirement:

7. Ratings: After commenting, score, in column to the right, using Unsatisfactory, Marginal, Satisfactory, Very Good , Exceptional. (See page 4 for explanation of rating scale.) (Circle)

Quality
Comments:

E

VG

S M U

Cost Control
Comments:

E

VG

S

Timeliness of Performance
Comments:
E

VG

S

Business Relations/Customer Satisfaction
Comments:
E

VG

S

a. How would you describe the quality of the contractor’s management relationship with government counterparts, including ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes?
Comments:
E

VG

S

b. How timely and effective was the contractor when identifying and correcting problems?
Comments:
E

VG

S

c. How well did the contractor respond to emergency situations?
Comments:
E

VG

S

d. How well did the contractor manage any subcontractors?
Comments:
E

VG

S

e. How effectively were safety issues dealth with?
Comments:
E

VG

S

f. How effectively did the contractor manage the entire project?
Comments:
E

VG

S

g. How effectively did the contractor mobilize?
Comments:
E

VG

S

h. How effectively did the contractor demobilize?
Comments:
E

VG

S

i. How effectively did the contractor apply sufficient resources for the project?
Comments:
E

VG

S

8. Subcontractors, Teaming and Joint Venture Partners. List major subcontractors, teams and joint venture partners, by names, with a brief description of work and names of key personnel.

Subcontractor, Team or Joint Venture

Description of Work

Key Personnel

9. Would you select this firm again? [ ]Yes [ ]No

Comments:

11. Respondent’s Identification:

Name:

Position/Title:

Email Address & Phone Number:

Relationship and Time Involved with Program/Contract:

Date of Evaluation:

Block 1:

Name, address and phone number of the contract being evaluated. Identify the specific division being evaluated if there is more than one.

Block 2:

Contract number(s) used to evaluate performance.

Block 3:

Contract value, including option periods. The value in this block should reflect any increases or decreases affected during the life of the contract.

Block 4:

Dates in which the contractor being evaluated performed work for the evaluator.

Block 5:

Check all blocks that apply to contracts with the contractor being evaluated.

Block 6:

Brief description of the work performed by the contractor. Please indicate whether the work was performed in arctic conditions.

Block 7:

Indicate the contractor’s rating in the far right column. In the comment areas, provide rationale for the rating. Indicate the contract requirements that were exceeded (when a value of E is given) and those that were not met (when a value of U or M is given) by the contractor.

Block 8:

Identify major subcontractors, team partners and joint ventures and include their work responsibilities. List key personnel employed during the contract that played a major role in the performance rating. Do not list key personnel not employed long enough to effect performance. In some cases, more than one individual may have served in a key position.

Block 9:

Explain why you would or would not select the contractor for this contract again.

Block 10:

State your opinion as to whether or not the contractor is committed to customer satisfaction.

Block 11:

Provide your contact information as requested.

RATING GUIDELINES

Use the following instructions as guidance in making evaluations.

PERFORMANCE RATINGS

RATING
DEFINITION
Exceptional
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements, and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains a problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
The question does not apply. No performance record identifiable within the area of evaluation.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .