Evaluation of non-price factors.docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12443925Q0016
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
The document is an evaluation criteria file for non-price factors in a federal contract opportunity for toilet pumping services on the Stearns Ranger District of Daniel Boone National Forest. The evaluation criteria cover two primary non-price factors: Contract Experience and Past Performance, each with four rating levels from Excellent to Unacceptable.
For Contract Experience, ratings range from Excellent (five or more years of similar experience with Forest Service or federal agencies) to Unacceptable (less than one year of experience). Past Performance ratings similarly progress from Excellent (excellent formal performance ratings or references) to Unacceptable (poor performance ratings or references). These criteria will be used to assess technical acceptability on a pass/fail basis for the toilet pumping services contract, which is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS code 562991 with a $9 million average annual receipts threshold. The contract will have a base year from 04/01/2025 - 03/31/2026 with potential for four additional one-year option periods through 03/31/2030.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation of non-price factors for Stearns Toilet Pumping Contract
Experience
| Excellent – | Bidder has five or more years of similar experience for the Forest Service or other federal agency |
| Acceptable – | Bidder has five or more years of similar experience for another federal agency or in the private sector |
| Marginal – | Bidder has less than five years of similar experience for the Forest Service other federal agency or private sector |
Unacceptable – Bidder has less than 1 year of similar experience.
Past Performance
| Excellent - | Bidder received an excellent or better formal past performance rating or excellent verbal reference from past COR(s) or private contracting personnel |
| Acceptable - | Bidder received a good formal past performance rating or good verbal reference from past COR(s) or private contracting personnel or has no rating history |
| Marginal - | Bidder received a fair formal past performance rating or fair verbal reference from past COR(s) or private contracting personnel |
| Unacceptable- | Bidder received a poor formal past performance rating or poor written rating from past COR(s) or private contracting personnel |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .