Evaluation Form.pdf
PDF 202 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFQ for Architectural Services for CDBG
- Solicitation number
- PE-67090-NONST-2026-000000008
- Issued by
- Hall County, Georgia
About this file
This document is an Engineering/Architectural Evaluation Form designed to assess and score architectural or engineering firms for a potential contract, likely related to a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) project. The form allows an evaluator to rate a firm across six key selection factors: geographic location and accessibility, track record of completing CDBG projects in the last 5 years, prior experience with similar projects, quality of response, previous community experience, and price competitiveness. Each factor can be scored from 0-1 (poor), 2-3 (good), or 4-5 (excellent), with a total possible score determined by summing these ratings.
The evaluation form also includes additional qualifying criteria such as the firm's ability to meet PER/PAR deadlines, possession of Errors and Omissions insurance, and status as a Section 3 or Minority/Women-owned Business Enterprise (MBE/WBE). These latter classifications can earn the firm an additional point if applicable. The comprehensive scoring mechanism appears designed to holistically evaluate a firm's capabilities, experience, and alignment with potential project requirements, with a focus on technical competence, community engagement, and economic inclusivity.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Section 3 Packet.pdf | ||
| PAR Requirements.pdf | ||
| Architectural Statement of Qualifications.pdf | ||
| Memo.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
EVALUATION FORM
Evaluate the Architectural or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection factors.
SELECTION FACTORS POOR GOOD
POINTS
ASSIGNED EXCELLENT
1. Firm’s geographic location and accessibility?
2. Firm’s track record for successfully completing previous CDBG projects in the last 5 years?
3. Prior experience with successfully completed similar projects?
4. Quality of response in relation to requested submittal information?
5. Previous experience with the community?
6. Is price competitive?
TOTAL SCORE __________
PROJECT:
NAME OF FIRM:
NAME OF EVALUATOR:
DATE OF EVALUATION:
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline?
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance?
Is the firm a Section 3 business?
Is the firm a MBE/WBE business?
____ No
____ No
____ No
____ No
0-1 2-3 4-5 __________
0-1 2-3 4-5 __________
0-1 2-3 4-5 __________
0-1 2-3 4-5 __________
0-1 2-3 4-5 __________
____ Yes
____ Yes
____ Yes (1 point if yes)
____ Yes (1 point if yes)
TOTAL POINTS __________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .