Evaluation Factors.docx

EVALUATION FACTORS

The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

a) Technical

a. Key Personnel

b. Quality Control

c. Use of Bio-preferred

b) Past Performance

c) Price

a) Technical – Key Personnel will receive a rating of Does Not Meet, Meets, or Exceeds as defined below.

Does Not Meet: Key Personnel do not have experience cleaning similar size facilities.

Meets: Key Personnel have experience cleaning similar size facilities.

Exceeds: Key Personnel have experience cleaning similar size or larger commercial facilities

b) Technical – Quality Control will receive a rating of Does Not Meet, Meets, or Exceeds as defined below.

Does Not Meet: Offeror does not demonstrate an understanding and sound approach to meeting the requirements.

Meets: Offeror demonstrates an understanding and sound approach to meeting the contract requirements.

Exceeds: Offeror demonstrates an understanding and sound approach to meeting the contract requirements AND exceeds the requirements of the solicitation.

c) Technical - Biobased: The Government will evaluate quotes identifying the company’s use of bio-based products. In conducting the assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings:

Acceptable Proposal clearly states the list of products that will be used.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly state the list of products that will be used.

c) Past Performance information will consider recency (within last 3 years), relevancy (similar work to this project) and quality of past performance (based on contacting references provided in Past Performance Data Sheet and Resumes of Key Personnel).

i. Each project will be evaluated as Recent or Not Recent.

ii. Each project will be evaluated as Relevant, Somewhat Relevant or Not Relevant

iii. Each project submitted will receive one of the following quality ratings:

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Neutral – No record of performance

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

iv. Considering 1) Recency, 2) Relevancy and 3) Quality, of all the projects combined, the offeror will receive an overall Past Performance reflecting our confidence in the offeror ability to perform the contract requirements based on their past performance records as follows:

High Confidence

Significant Confidence

Confidence

Unknown Confidence

Little Confidence

No Confidence

c) Price Evaluation- Do Not include technical proposal with Price proposal This criterion will include consideration of cost information provided to support item prices entered in Section B, Schedule of Items. It is the Government's intent to assess the unit prices to determine reasonableness and offeror's understanding of the work and ability to perform the contract.

The importance of price may become greater as the differences between technical proposals decrease. Where technical proposals are determined to be substantially equal, price may control award.