Evaluation Criteria RDM Baseline Monitoring 2021-2022.docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RED DEVIL MINE BASELINE MONITORING Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140L6320R0005
About this file
This document outlines evaluation criteria for a baseline monitoring contract opportunity at Red Devil Mine in Alaska. The contractor must have expertise in hydrogeology, hydrology, chemistry, project health and safety, and project management to collect high-quality monitoring data at the remote CERCLA site. Key staff are required to have experience on similar projects, including the project manager with 5 years of experience and at least one remote project, and the field team lead with 3 years of experience including one remote project. The chemist must have 3 years of experience reviewing and ensuring quality of analytical data. Contractors must demonstrate the capability to successfully complete the monitoring within required timeframes while meeting all quality control and quality assurance standards for the CERCLA project.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Sol_140L6320R0005_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| Addendum 01 to Baseline Monitoring SOW - Sept 2020_0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sol_140L6320R0005_Amd_0002.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6320R0005_Amd_0001.pdf | ||
| Sol_140L6320R0005.pdf | ||
| Scope of Work RDM Baseline Monitoring 2021-2022 .docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria
Red Devil Mine - Alaska 2021-2022 Baseline Monitoring
Data quality objectives for baseline monitoring at Red Devil are based on and generally consistent with those developed for the Remedial Investigation. Consequently the contractor tasked with performing baseline monitoring must possess the technical understanding and experience to collect data of appropriate quality in a cost effective manner. The criteria listed are based on the technical, logistical and regulatory challenges inherent to the Red Devil CERCLA project.
| Proposal Element |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Evaluation Objective |
| Past Performance |
| Review of CPARS and other available performance evaluations. Each proposer should also provide at least 3 references who can provide objective feedback on at least one project with similar scope and complexity. |
| 1. Does the contractor understand monitoring methods and procedures employed on CERCLA sites |
2. Does the contractor have experience collecting high quality data in remote locations with challenging logistics
| Technical Capability emphasizing the expertise and experience of key project contributors |
| 1. Does the contractor or proposed subcontractor have staff with expertise in hydrogeology/hydrology, chemistry, project health and safety, project management and logistics |
2. The project manager should have a minimum of 5 years of experience in monitoring, with at least 1 project completed at a remote site
3. The field team lead should have a minimum of 3 years of experience with at least 1 project completed at a remote site
4. The chemist responsible for modifying the project quality assurance plan and for reviewing the data and developing the analytical quality assurance summary should have at least 3 years of experience in performing this very specialized task
5. Does the proposal specify who will write the project health and safety plan and does that person have at least 1 year of experience developing such documentation Does the contractor have enough staff with right mix of skills to collect the data within the specified time frames and the right specialized experience to meet all the data quality objectives and quality control/quality assurance requirements for this CERCLA project.
| Company experience with similar monitoring projects |
| 1. Has the proposer performed projects of similar scope, scale in remote locations |
2. How many key staff described in the proposal played a similar role in the company’s past projects –
3. Is the laboratory subcontractor on the ADEC’s list of approved laboratories?
Does the contractor have the knowledge and experience to collect high quality data in remote areas, analyze the data within the context of project objectives and overcome logistical obstacles to:
1. Mob/demob of personnel and equipment/material
2. Arrange and manage field team accommodations,
3. Meeting sample holding times
4. Compile a complete data set of appropriate data quality
The criteria defined above represent a minimum capability that any contractor must meet in order for their proposal to successfully conduct baseline monitoring at Red Devil Mine. Any proposal that does not clearly demonstrate overall capability in all three technical elements according to the criteria defined above should not be considered capable of successfully executing this monitoring project.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .