Evaluation Criteria.pdf
PDF 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for One (1) Keyence High-Resolution Digital Microscope
- Solicitation number
- W911QX-25-Q-A005
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Criteria file for a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPТА) federal solicitation for a Keyence high-resolution digital microscope. The solicitation (W911QX-25-Q-A005) requires one digital microscope with multiple specific components, including a controller, console, Windows 10 PC, high-performance camera, motorized observation system, various lenses, lighting unit, and support package. Delivery is required within fourteen days after contract award to the U.S. Army Research Laboratory in Adelphi, MD.
The evaluation will assess vendors on three primary criteria: Technical Acceptability (determining if the proposed product meets performance specifications), Past Performance (rated as acceptable/unacceptable), and Price. Only vendors rated "Acceptable" on past performance will be eligible for award, with the contract ultimately being awarded to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer. The solicitation is issued by the Department of the Army Materiel Command Army Contracting Command at Aberdeen Proving Ground, with no specific small business set-aside, and requires submission within five business days after posting, by 5:00 PM Eastern Standard Time.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment.pdf | ||
| Redacted DandF for OTFOC.pdf | ||
| Solicitation.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria (Lowest Price Technically Acceptable)
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and has the lowest evaluated price of all offers meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors.
Technical Acceptability:
The technical acceptability element of the evaluation will be a determination as to whether the proposed product meets the performance characteristics and specifications in the solicitation. The Technical element of the evaluation shall be based solely on information furnished by the vendor. The Government is not responsible for locating or securing any information, which is not identified in the proposal. To ensure sufficient information is available, vendors must furnish as part of their proposal all descriptive material (such as cuts, illustrations, drawings, or other information) necessary for the Government to determine whether the product meets the performance characteristics and specifications of the requirement. If the offeror proposes to modify a product so as to conform to the requirement of this solicitation, the offeror shall include a clear description of such proposed modifications and clearly mark any descriptive materials to show modifications.
Past Performance:
Past performance will be evaluated on an acceptable/unacceptable rating basis. An “Acceptable” rating is defined as the Government having reasonable confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. An “Unacceptable” rating is defined as the Government having minimal confidence that the offeror can complete all requirements under the contract and meet stated delivery dates. The ratings will be based upon past performance information the Government obtains. Only offerors rated “Acceptable” will be eligible for award. Award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offer out of all offers rated “Acceptable” on Past Performance.
Price:
Price will be evaluated based on the total proposed price, including options, (if any).
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .