Evaluation_Criteria.pdf

PDF 97 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP026-34 BOE Emergency Alert System
Solicitation number
RFP026-34
Issued by
New Haven County, Connecticut

About this file

This is an Evaluation Criteria document for Meriden Public Schools' Request for Proposal (RFP026-34) for an Emergency Alert System in Connecticut. The RFP seeks competitive proposals for a comprehensive wearable emergency alert system to be integrated with the school district's current public address system to enhance security posture and emergency response capabilities. The evaluation criteria establish a 100-point scoring system with specific weightings across multiple performance categories designed to identify the most cost-effective solution.

The evaluation framework prioritizes price as the primary factor, allocating 30 points for implementation costs of hardware and software and 10 points for annual recurring costs. Technical merit accounts for 20 points, encompassing service level agreements and compliance with project scope requirements and proposal timelines. Interoperability represents a significant criterion with 20 points, requiring compatibility with both the Mutualink Incident Response System (10 points) and the Bogen Intercom and Speaker system (10 points). Additional evaluation categories include prior experience with Meriden Public Schools and similar projects (5 points), system expandability and scalability (5 points), and responsiveness (10 points), which assesses vendor communication responsiveness, attendance at optional site walkthroughs, and proximity and availability of local sales and service offices.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Criteria

Applicants will select the most cost‐effective proposals with price products and services being the primary factor (most heavily weighted).

Factor Possible Points

Description

Price‐ Implementation Costs

30 Price of hardware and software needed to implement the wearable badge and enhanced communications solution (primary factor)

Price‐Recurring Costs

10 Annual recurring costs associated with the proposed solution

Prior Experience 5 ‐Experience with Meriden Public Schools and similar projects and references (5 points)

Interoperability 20 ‐Compatibility with Mutualink Incident Response System (10 points)

‐Compatibility with Bogen Intercom and Speaker system (10 points)

Expandability 5 ‐Ability to add‐on to the system at initial site, as well as additional school sites

Responsiveness 10 ‐Responsiveness of the offeror‐replied promptly to emails, attended optional on‐site walk through if applicable (5 points)

‐Proximity of sales and service offices, Assigned representative is available locally (5 points)

Technical Merit 20 ‐Quality / technical merit of the proposed solution to meet needs of the applicant. Service level agreement if applicable (10 points)

‐Compliance with listed requirements of the project scope and proposal requirements, whether or not the proposal includes all information requested; timelines met, services will commence as requested by applicant (10 points)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .