Evaluation Criteria (Comparative Evaluation).docx
DOCX document 12 KB Posted
- Attached to
- One (1) 3D Polymer Printer Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W911QX22R0035
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Salient Characteristics Redacted.docx | DOCX document | |
| Provisions and Clauses Full-Text Attachment (for Combo Synopsis-Solicitation).docx | DOCX document | |
| Combination Synopsis-Solicitation for Commercial Purchases (Under SAT).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria (Comparative Evaluation)
The specific evaluation criteria to be used are as follows:
In accordance with FAR 13.106-2(b)(3), comparative evaluation procedures will be utilized. Comparative evaluation is the comparison of all offers received in response to this solicitation against each other. An item-by-item comparison of each offer to one another will be performed to determine which offer provides the most benefit to the Government. Award will be made to the offer that is most advantageous to the Government. The Government may award to the lowest priced offeror that meets the Government’s minimum requirements; however, the Government reserves the right to award to a higher priced offeror exceeding the minimum requirements if it is most advantageous to the Government. In order to be considered for award, an offer must meet the Government’s minimum technical requirement contained in this solicitation. The below evaluation factors will be utilized during evaluation (in no order of relative importance):
Price Technical Capabilities/Specification Past Performance
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .