Evaluation Criteria_BootRepair.doc
DOC document 97 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SP23-BootRepair-Q01 Boot Repair
- Solicitation number
- BD-23-1084-POLGH-GHQ-87666
- Issued by
- Massachusetts
About this file
This document outlines the Evaluation Criteria for the Boot Repair contract solicitation (SP23-BootRepair-Q01) issued by the Massachusetts State Police. The contract will provide boot repair services to the Massachusetts State Police and other Commonwealth of Massachusetts entities. The evaluation criteria include pricing, experience, prompt payment discounts, references, and a Supplier Diversity Plan. Bidders will be evaluated and scored based on these criteria, and the bidder receiving the highest total score will be awarded the contract. The contract will require the winning bidder to sign the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Standard Terms and Conditions.
The pricing evaluation will account for 30% of the total score, with the bidder offering the best price receiving the full 30 points. Experience, with a 20-point maximum for bidders with over 10 years of experience, will make up 20% of the total score. Prompt payment discounts of up to 10% will be awarded up to 10 points, and references will account for 15 points. Bidders certified with the Commonwealth's Small Business Purchasing Program will receive 15 points, and the Supplier Diversity Plan will account for 10% of the total score.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFR_SP23-BootRepair-Q01~1.doc | DOC document | |
| Response Form A~45.docx | DOCX document | |
| Frequently Asked Questions~14.pdf | ||
| StandardContractForm~48.docx | DOCX document | |
| W9_Mass Fillable~6.pdf | ||
| Terms and Conditions~53.pdf | ||
| eppform~57.doc | DOC document | |
| SDO Directory Listing Alpha_2.10.23~1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| StandardContractForm_Instructions_8.6.21~27.pdf | ||
| Customer Reference Form for bidders~45.doc | DOC document | |
| Bid Sheet - Boot Repair services~2.docx | DOCX document | |
| SDP_Plan_FY24.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Signatory Listing~52.doc | DOC document | |
| Prompt Pay Discount Form~45.doc | DOC document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BD-23-1084-POLGH-GHQ-87666
SP23-BOOTREPAIR-Q01
EVALUATION CRITERIA
An evaluation committee will be assigned to analyze the merits of all proposals submitted by the due date and time.
INTRODUCTION
Bidders must submit responses that meet all required (technical and business) specifications and procedures as specified in the RFR. Any response determined by the procurement management team to be non-responsive to any required specification of this RFR will be found at the team’s discretion, non-responsive without further evaluation.
REQUIREMENTS
Bidder must be able to provide all commodities and services as requested in this RFR. Failure to provide all commodities and services will result in the disqualification of a vendor. All business specifications are required and should be addressed in writing by all bidders.
A “required” specification is one that must be met in order for a proposal to be considered responsive. Any proposal which fails to meet a required specification of this RFR will be considered non-responsive and disqualified unless the evaluation team, in its discretion, determines that the non-compliance is inadvertent, insubstantial, can be corrected, or that an alternative proposed by the bidder is an acceptable substitute. In these cases, the evaluation team may allow the bidder to make minor corrections to their technical and business proposal. All corrections must be made within three (3) business days of notification. No corrections to price offered will be allowed.
ALTERNATIVES
A bidder may determine that it cannot respond to required equipment but believes it can offer equivalent performance by some other means. Such a bidder must explicitly identify the required specification to which it cannot respond in its response; state that it cannot meet the required specification and that it is proposing an alternative; and provide a thorough description of how the proposed alternative achieves the equivalent performance.
CLARIFICATION AND CORRECTION OF RESPONSES
The procurement management team is not required to seek clarification and/or correction of responses. The bidder, therefore, should be as clear and unambiguous as possible in all its responses to the RFR.
If clarification or correction is required, the procurement management team may request either oral or written clarification, or correction from an individual named in the bidder’s response as authorized by the bidder. Bidder’s response must be received within three (3) business days of notification.
The procurement management team may allow for clarification or correction on matters that can be corrected without prejudice to other bidders. No correction or clarification to prices, terms and conditions, or the submission of supplemental information prejudicial to the interests of other bidders or to fair competition shall be permitted.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The evaluation criteria are designed to select the proposal that offers the best value to the Massachusetts State Police and Commonwealth of Massachusetts entities. Only responsive proposals that meet all required specifications and procedures, as outlined in the RFR and above, will be evaluated, ranked, and scored by the procurement management team according to these evaluation criteria.
The bidder receiving the greatest number of total points will be awarded the contract. Execution of this contract requires bidders signing of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Standard Terms and Conditions, Contract and any other required state forms and final negotiations (if applicable).
The evaluation criteria will be posted on COMMBUYS after award and execution of contract.
EVALUATION AND SCORING:
The procurement management team will determine if the response submitted is responsive to this RFR and all of its specifications. The following is the sequential evaluation process of the responses.
PRICING - COMMODITY………. 30 PTS
Bidders’ responses will be evaluated to ensure compliance with required specifications and procedures. All bidders meeting specification and procedural requirements will then be ranked according to the pricing offered. The bidder offering the best price will be given the full 15 points. Each subsequent score will be reduced by the percentage that their pricing differs from the best pricing offered.
Example, the best price offered is $100. This bidder will receive 15 points. If the second best price offered is $120. This bidder will receive 13 points.
If a bidder offers a prompt payment discount, their price quoted will be reduced by the prompt payment offered before being ranked.
NOTE: COST FACTOR CONSIDERATION
A bidder must consider any and all costs in providing its proposal. The procurement management team will assume that all standard business expenses that the bidder incurred in connection with meeting all required specifications and procedures are factored into the bid.
EXPERIENCE……20 PTS
Bidders' responses will be evaluated to ensure compliance with required specifications. All bidders meeting specification requirements will be scored on their experience. Bidders who have less than 10 years of experience will receive 10 points. Bidders who have more than 10 years of experience will receive up to 20 points.
PROMPT PAYMENT DISCOUNT…..10 PTS
Bidders offering a prompt payment discount will receive up to 10 points. The bidder offering the highest percentage will receive the most points and each subsequent score will receive the percentage that their discount differs from the best percentage offered.
REFERENCES……..15 PTS
Bidders’ responses will be evaluated to ensure compliance with required specifications and procedures. All bidders meeting specification and procedural requirements will be scored on references.
Each qualifying reference (up to three) will be contacted. Based upon the responses received the evaluator will score the reference as satisfactory or unsatisfactory.
CERTIFIED SMALL BUSINESS PURCHASING PROGRAM……..15 PTS
This is a small procurement targeted to verified small businesses participating in the Commonwealth’s Small Business Purchasing Program(SBPP). Bidders certified with the Small Business Purchasing Program will be awarded 15 points.
SDP PLAN……..10 PTS
Bidders' responses will be evaluated to ensure compliance with required specifications. All bidders meeting specification requirements will be scored on their Supplier Diversity Plan. Bidders responding to this RFR are required to submit a Supplier Diversity Plan. Requirements are pursuant to Operational Services Division policy. The Bidders SDP must be evaluated at least a minimum of 10% of the total evaluation.
TOTALING OF POINTS
The procurement management team will add together the points awarded for each section evaluated and make its final recommendation. The bidder(s) offering the overall best value to the Massachusetts State Police and/or Commonwealth of Massachusetts will be awarded the contract.
Maximum points available:
ADDED VALUE
The procurement management team reserves the right to award additional points to any and all bidders who demonstrate an item of added value. This may be an item that was addressed by the team in the RFR or an item offered by the bidder. The team reserves the right to award up to 3 additional points for each item of ‘added value’.
BEST AND FINAL OFFER
The procurement management team reserves the right to request best and final offers from one or more bidders. Best and final offers will be exercised should the procurement management team deem it is in the best interest of the Department of State Police and/ or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in order to obtain the best value.
BIDDER NOTIFICATION OF AWARD
Written notification will be sent to the awarded bidder(s). A letter will also be sent to each responding bidder who submitted a proposal but was not awarded a contract.
PROCUREMENT MANAGEMENT TEAM
The procurement management team may consist of 1 or more members of the Department of State Police and/ or individuals from outside agencies with the required skills and knowledge to assist in the evaluation of responses.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .