ESBD_File_337589_Addendum 1 Question and Answers.pdf
PDF 64 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Texas Southern University MEP Services
- Solicitation number
- 717-24-703
- Issued by
- Harris County, Houston City, Texas
About this file
This document is an Addendum to Request for Proposals (RFP) # 717-24-703 for Professional Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Services issued by Texas Southern University (TSU). The addendum provides answers to six questions received from potential bidders, addressing topics such as whether partial bids will be accepted, availability of existing asset information, the scope of work, and the timing for submission of HUB plans. TSU confirms that all types of work - man-in-attendance, call-out, and special projects/quoted work - are included in the scope, and that HUB plans should be submitted in conjunction with the RFP response.
The RFP seeks to establish a contract with qualified company(ies) to provide MEP services to TSU, which is located within Harris County and the City of Houston, Texas. The contract term and any renewal options are not specified in the provided information.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Procurement Services - Purchasing
Addendum 1
Questions & Answers
RFP # 717-24-703
Professional Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing (MEP) Services
1. Will you accept a partial bid? (e.g - only plumbing or only electrical)?
Answer: Yes
2. Can you provide a list of existing assets (pumps and/or motors)? (Make/Model/ Size)
Answer: This information can not be provided at this time.
3. Could you please specify whether the scope of work primarily pertains to man-in attendance, call-out, or special projects/ quoted work?
Answer: All of the above.
4. Should the hub plan be submitted before the RFP, or is it required to be submitted in conjunction with the RFP?
Answer: Yes
5. Criterion 1 numbers 3, 4, and 5 and Criterion 2 numbers 2, 3, and 4 asked the same information. Are these questions intended to be repeated? If not which section, would you prefer the information in?
Answer: Please reframe from answering twice. Please only answer in Criterion 2.
6. I notice that you've recently released an RFP for ongoing maintenance services and was wondering if you would be open to respondents proposing alternative models or solutions as a response.
Answer: Alternate model can be presented as options after your original response of the posted solicitation.
Please sign this Addendum and include it in your response. Your signature will signify your acknowledgement / receipt of this addendum.
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .