ESBD_497211_1773771140377_717-26-736, RFQ for Digital Accessibility Training & Compliance Coordinator.pdf
PDF 939 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 717-26-736
- Issued by
- Harris County, Texas
About this file
This is a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) issued by Texas Southern University, a state entity, for a Digital Accessibility Training & Compliance Coordinator position (RFQ #717-26-736). The RFQ seeks qualifications to establish a one-year contract with two optional single-year renewals, beginning upon contract execution. The services encompass designing and delivering a comprehensive digital accessibility program aligned with WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA standards, including governance setup, tiered training programs for faculty, staff, administrators, and student content creators, web and mobile accessibility audits, vendor compliance management through VPAT intake and screening, development of Equally Effective Alternative Access Plans (EEAAPs), and communications support. Key deliverables include policy drafts, training curricula, audit reports, remediation guidance, contract language addenda, and interim and annual accessibility reports. The submission deadline is 11:00 a.m. Central Time on Tuesday, March 31, 2026. There is no pre-bid meeting scheduled. The RFQ was issued on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, with a question submission deadline of Tuesday, March 24, 2026. The work is to be performed on a hybrid basis, combining on-site sessions in Houston with remote services.
Evaluation will be conducted on a best-value basis with two equally weighted criteria: Experience of Firm/Person (50 percent) and Qualifications of Key Personnel & Proposed Approach (50 percent). Respondents must submit one paper copy and one flash drive version of their qualifications, organized with an introduction letter, table of contents, and five tabs addressing the evaluation criteria, TSU terms and conditions, execution of offer, and addenda. Respondents must provide company background, higher education and public sector experience, digital accessibility training and compliance portfolio examples with at least five references, and disclose any debarments, protests, or litigation within five years. The RFQ does not specify pricing information or set-asides. Respondents must carry Workers Compensation Insurance and Commercial General Liability Insurance with minimum limits of $500,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 general aggregate, provided by Texas-licensed companies with "A" ratings from Best. TSU reserves the right to award without Best and Final Qualifications (BAFO), to award to multiple vendors, or to make no award. All submitted qualifications become TSU property and will not be returned; qualifications remain valid for 90 days or until selection is made, whichever occurs first.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Page | 1
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
DIGITAL ACCESSIBILITY TRAINING &
COMPLIANCE COORDINATOR
RFQ # 717-26-736
DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTAL:
11:00 a.m., Central Time, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
(Qualifications received after the date and time specified will not be accepted)
Texas Southern University
PROCUREMENT SERVICES
Attn: Thomas Britt 3100 Cleburne Street
Mack O. Hannah Hall, Suite 333 Houston, Texas 77004 - 4598
Page | 2
SECTION I
GENERAL INFORMATION
1.1 SCOPE. The State of Texas, by and through Texas Southern University (TSU), seeks sealed Qualifications to establish a contract for a Digital Accessibility Training & Compliance Coordinator, in accordance with the specifications contained in this Request for Qualification (RFQ).
1.2 CONTRACT TERM. The services requested shall be provided for a period of one (1) year, beginning with the execution of the contract, with two (2) single-year options upon written agreement from both parties.
1.3 DEFINITIONS. The following is a list of generic definitions to be used only if the terms appear in the RFQ:
(a) Acceptable Quality Level - The level of performance of requested services below which the contract will not be paid or damages may be assessed
(b) Addendum - A modification of the specifications issued by TSU and distributed to prospective Respondents prior to the opening of responses
(c) Best and Final Qualification (BAFO) - A formal request made to selected Respondents for revisions to the originally submitted Qualification
(d) Contract – The contract awarded as a result of this RFQ and all exhibits thereto. This RFQ, any Addendum issued in conjunction with this RFQ, the successful Respondent’s Qualification, any BAFO, and subsequent submission by
Respondent, shall all be fully incorporated therein as exhibits
(e) Contractor – Respondent whose Qualification results in a contract with TSU
(f) Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) – The Electronic State Business Daily, which is available on-line at http:esbd.state.tx.us/
(g) Gov’t Code – Texas Government Code.
(h) Qualification – The response submitted by a vendor to TSU as a result of this solicitation.
(i) Respondent – Any person, firm or vendor who submits a Qualification in response to this solicitation.
(j) RFQ – Request for Qualifications, which is the type of solicitation embodied in this document.
(k) TAC – Texas Administrative Code, which is the publication for administrative rules.
1.4 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST:
Actual and Perceived Conflicts
Page | 3
By submitting a Qualification, the Respondent represents and warrants that neither it nor its employees and subcontractors have an actual or potential conflict of interest in entering a Contract with the TSU. The Respondent also represents and warrants that entering a Contract with the TSU will not create the appearance of impropriety. In its
Qualification, the Respondent shall disclose any existing or potential conflict of interest that it might have in contracting with the TSU. The requirement to disclose any actual or potential conflict of interest shall begin at initial request for bids and continue during the term of the contract and shall survive until the end of the recordkeeping requirement in Section 1.5. TSU will decide, in its sole discretion, whether an actual or perceived conflict should result in Qualification disqualification or Contract termination.
Current and Former TSU Employees
In addition to the disclosures required above, the Respondent shall also disclose any of its personnel who are current or former officers or employees of the TSU or who are related, within the third degree by consanguinity (as defined by
§573.023, Gov’t Code) or within the second degree by affinity (as defined by §573.025, Gov’t Code), to any current or former officers or employees of the TSU.
Respondents must comply with all applicable Texas and federal laws and regulations relating to the hiring of former state employees (e.g., Texas Government Code Chapters 572 and 573). Such “revolving door” provisions generally restrict former agency heads from communicating with or appearing before the agency on certain matters for two years after leaving the agency. The revolving door provisions also restrict some former employees from representing clients on matters that the employee participated in during state service or matters that were in the employees’ official responsibility. Respondent, by signing this solicitation, certifies that it has complied with all applicable laws and regulations regarding former state employees.
1.5 RECORDS RETENTION
The Respondent shall retain all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and any other records or books relating to the performance called for in the Contract. The Respondent shall retain all such records for a period of seven (7) years after the expiration of the Contract, or until TSU and/or State Auditor's Office is satisfied that all audit and litigation matters are resolved, whichever period is longer. The Respondent shall grant access to all books, records and documents pertinent to the Contract to TSU, the State Auditor of Texas, and any federal governmental entity that has authority to review records due to federal funds being spent under the Contract.
1.6 INSURANCE AND OTHER SECURITY
Contractor represents and warrants that it will, within five (5) business days of executing this agreement, provide
Texas Southern University with current certificates of insurance or other proof acceptable to Texas Southern
University of the following insurance coverage:
Standard Workers Compensation Insurance covering all personnel who will provide services under this
Contract
Commercial General Liability Insurance, personal injury and advertising injury with, at a minimum, the following limits: $500,000 minimum each occurrence; $1,000,000 per general aggregate
Contractor represents and warrants that all of the above coverage is with companies licensed in the state of Texas, with
“A” rating from Best, and authorized to provide the corresponding coverage. Contractor also represents and warrants that all policies contain endorsements prohibiting cancellation except upon at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to Texas Southern University. Contractor represents and warrants that it shall maintain the above insurance coverage
Page | 4 during the term of this Contract and shall provide Texas Southern University with an executed copy of the policies immediately upon request.
1.7 COMMODITY CODE
The NIGP / State of Texas commodity code for this solicitation 909-33
1.8 BACKGROUND
Texas Southern University (“TSU”) is an elite, Carnegie R2 Institution and proud to be the premiere producer of talent for s strong Texas. The Owner one of the largest Historically Black College/University (“HBCU”) in the nation and destined to become the first HBCU with the coveted Carnegie R1 status.
Since its founding in 1927, TSU has evolved from its origins as a small junior college into an elite, nationally competitive, Texas Southern is proud to be one of 11 HBCU’s designated as a Doctoral University of High Research
Activity (R2) by The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Recognized for not only its research, TSU has demonstrated a commitment in every facet of university life from academics to athletics. Texas Southern
University currently offers more than 120 undergraduate and graduate programs and concentrations at the baccalaureate, graduate-master, graduate-doctoral, and professional level. These programs are organized into 11 colleges and the campus is situated on more than 150-acres of land in the heart of Houston’s historic Third Ward community.
As the institution celebrates 95 years of providing learners with social and upward mobility through education, the administration has paid tribute to its rich past, while celebrating its present state, and envisioning its future.
Texas Southern University is committed to transforming lives and achieving unprecedented success at an accelerated pace. The Board of Regents, President, Administration, Faculty, and Staff live the mission of TSU everyday through their respective commitment to the students. Texas Southern University is PROUD to be the first public institution in
Houston.
End of Section I
Page | 5
SECTION II
SCOPE OF WORK
Digital Accessibility Training & Compliance Coordinator
2.1 Objectives
Partner with TSU to plan, launch, and operate the Critical Path Sprint through April 24, 2026, and support post-deadline
Stabilization and Maturity activities, emphasizing risk reduction, essential access, procurement controls, documentation, and capacity-building via training across all TSU audiences.
2.2 Services & Deliverables
The selected Consultant shall provide, at a minimum, the following services (deliverables may be refined during kickoff):
A. Governance & Program Setup
1. Draft/adapt a Digital Accessibility Policy mandating WCAG 2.1/2.2 AA and advise on an Accessibility Steering
Committee/Review Board charter and operating cadence. (Deliverable: policy draft + governance charter)
2. Develop accessibility metrics/dashboards and an Accessibility Statement with a feedback mechanism for public posting. (Deliverable: KPI set, dashboard framework, public statement)
B. Training & Capacity Building (priority)
Design and deliver a tiered training program (live, virtual, and asynchronous modules) for:
• Faculty: “Emergency Accessibility Basics,” content remediation workshops, LMS best practices.
• Staff & Administrators: Role-specific responsibilities, document remediation, web editing, procurement obligations.
• Student Content Creators (SGA, athletics, Greek life, clubs, media teams): Social media, video/captions, event flyers, web posts.
• IT/Procurement/Communications: VPAT/ACR intake, IV&V spot checks, contract language, brand/web templates.
Deliverables: curricula, slide decks, recordings, job aids/quick guides, attendance rosters, and an annual training calendar integrated with HR onboarding and recurring requirements.
C. Web/Mobile Audits & Critical Remediation Support
1. Conduct automated and manual audits of priority domains and key workflows (e.g., apply, register, pay) and advise on fixes for “Does Not Support” failures (keyboard traps, contrast, headings, skip links, forms).
(Deliverables: audit reports, prioritized remediation list, verification sweeps)
2. Ensure active PDF forms critical to enrollment and services are made accessible or converted to HTML with accessible form controls. (Deliverables: conversion plan, templates)
D. Procurement & Vendor Compliance (VPAT/ACR Program)
Page | 6
1. Implement a VPAT Intake & Screening process (v2.4 or later International Edition), with Independent Validation
& Verification (IV&V) spot checks and Deficit Scoring to determine risk (Low/Medium/High). (Deliverables:
intake form, SOPs, scoring rubric, staff training)
2. Provide contract language addenda for remediation roadmaps; advise on Stop/Exception decisions and renewal enforcement. (Deliverables: model clauses, exception workflow)
E. EEAAPs & Exceptions
Develop Equally Effective Alternative Access Plans (EEAAPs) for tools that cannot be remediated short-term (e.g., certain STEM/simulation platforms); define barriers, alternatives, timelines, notification scripts, and responsible roles.
(Deliverables: EEAAP templates + completed EEAAPs for prioritized systems)
F. Communications & Change Management
Provide campus-wide communications (deadlines, policies, “what’s changing,” and where to get help); support
“Empathy Labs” to demonstrate barriers and build buy-in. (Deliverables: comms toolkit, empathy lab run-of-show)
G. Reporting & Maturity Planning
1. Produce an Interim Report by the federal deadline, and a Year-End Accessibility Report with KPIs, gaps, and roadmap. (Deliverables: interim and annual reports)
2. Provide a Digital Accessibility Maturity Model baseline and target plan (Ad Hoc → Optimized). (Deliverable:
maturity assessment + roadmap)
2.3 Timeline & Milestones (illustrative)
• Weeks 1–2: Governance setup; policy draft; inventory of high-risk assets; training calendar.
• Weeks 3–4: VPAT intake live; audits of top sites/workflows; begin faculty/web editor basics; comms launch.
• Weeks 5–7: Critical remediation guidance; EEAAP drafting; course content clinics.
• Week 8 (Deadline Window): Final verification sweep of top pages; publish accessibility statement; status memo.
• Post-Deadline (Months 2–12): Library/database VPATs; vendor enforcement; legacy content cleanup; annual report.
2.4 Place of Performance / Modality
Hybrid: on-site sessions in Houston and remote services, as mutually agreed.
End of Section II
Page | 7
SECTION III
CRITERIA
3.1 Evaluation Criteria
TSU will evaluate Qualifications on Best Value. Weights are as follows:
• Criterion 1: Experience of Firm/Person – 50%
• Criterion 2: Qualifications of Key Personnel & Proposed Approach – 50%
3.2 Criterion 1 – Experience of Firm or Person
Provide:
• company background
• higher-ed/public sector experience
• digital accessibility training and compliance portfolio
• sample projects comparable in size/scope (at least five references preferred with contact details)
• record of performance with TSU (if any)
• disclosures regarding debarments, protests, or litigation within five (5) years.
3.3 Criterion 2 — Qualifications of Personnel & Approach
Submit:
• Management plan and org chart showing lines of authority, primary contact, and key personnel with resumes and any relevant certifications (e.g., CPACC, WAS, CPWA, ADA Coordinator).
• Training plan detailing curricula for faculty, staff/administrators, and student content creators; sample materials and assessment approach.
• Methodology for audits, IV&V, EEAAP development, and reporting.
• Staffing levels committed to TSU and contingency/back-up personnel
End of Section III
Page | 8
SECTION IV
QUALIFICATION INFORMATION
4.1 SCHEDULE OF EVENTS
The solicitation process for this RFQ will proceed according to the following schedule:
EVENT DATE
Issue RFQ (ESBD and TSU) posting) Tuesday, March 17, 2026
Deadline for Submission of Questions Tuesday, March 24, 2026
Deadline for Submission of Qualifications Tuesday, March 31, 2026
4.2 REVISIONS TO SCHEDULE
TSU reserves the right to change the dates in the schedule of events above upon written notification through a posting on the Electronic State Business Daily (ESBD) and the TSU Purchasing website. It is the responsibility of interested parties to periodically check either website for updates to the RFQ prior to submitting a Qualification. The
Respondent’s failure to check the website will in no way release the selected Contractor from the requirements of addenda or additional information; nor will any resulting additional costs to meet the requirements be allowed after award(s).
4.3 PRE-BID MEETING
There will not be a pre-bid meeting.
4.4 QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
4.4.1 Submissions of your Qualification: Respondents shall submit one (1) paper copy of the Qualification.
Qualification pages should be numbered and contain an organized, paginated table of contents corresponding to the section and pages of the Qualification.
4.4.2 Please submit a flash drive version as well. Please ensure that your entire bid response is on the flash drive as this will be the official version of your bid response, and it will be the only copy we keep on file.
4.4.3 Format of Qualifications - Respondents will be expected to provide the following information in the order and detail prescribed below. Each section should be tabbed accordingly:
Introduction Letter (2-page maximum)
Table of Contents
Tab 1: Criterion 1
Tab 2: Criterion 2
Tab 3: TSU Terms and Conditions
Tab 4: Exhibit A: Execution of Qualification
Tab 5: Addenda, if applicable
Page | 9
4.4.4 Cost of Preparation: TSU will not reimburse the Respondent for any cost related to its Qualification. The
Respondent is responsible for any expense related to the preparation and submission of its Qualification.
4.4.5 TSU will not consider any Qualification that bears a copyright. Qualifications will be subject to the Texas
Public Information Act (PIA), Tex. Government Code, Chapter 552, and may be disclosed to the public upon request. The Qualification and other submitted information shall be presumed to be subject to disclosure unless a specific exception to disclosure under the PIA applies. If it is necessary for the Respondent to include proprietary or otherwise confidential information in its Qualification or other submitted information, the
Respondent must clearly label that proprietary or confidential information and identify the specific exception to disclosure in the PIA. Merely making a blanket claim the entire Qualification is protected from disclosure because it contains some proprietary information is not acceptable and shall make the entire Qualification subject to release under the PIA. In order to initiate the process of seeking an Attorney General opinion on the release of proprietary or confidential information, the specific provisions of the Qualification that are considered by the Respondent to be proprietary or confidential must be clearly labeled as described below.
Any information which is not clearly identified as proprietary or confidential shall be deemed to be subject to disclosure pursuant to the PIA. Subject to the Act, Respondents may protect trade and confidential information from public release. Trade secrets or other confidential information, submitted as part of a Qualification, shall be clearly marked at each page it appears. Such marking shall be in boldface type at least 14-point font.
4.5 INQUIRIES / QUESTIONS
4.5.1 All inquiries and questions shall be submitted in writing (in Word format for ease of cutting & pasting) via email to Mr. Thomas Britt at thomas.britt@tsu.edu by 12:00 noon Central time on Tuesday, March 24, 2026;
the date listed as the deadline for submission of questions as specified in Section 4.1 above.
4.5.2 All inquiries will result in written responses with copies posted to the State of Texas Electronic State Business
Daily and the TSU Purchasing website. If a Respondent does not have Internet access, a copy of all written responses may be obtained through the point of contact listed above.
4.5.3 Except as otherwise provided in this Section, upon issuance of this RFQ, other employees and representatives of TSU will not answer questions or otherwise discuss the contents of the RFQ with any potential Respondent or its representatives. Failure to observe this restriction may result in disqualification of any subsequent response. This restriction does not preclude discussions unrelated to this RFQ.
4.5.4 If Respondent takes any exceptions to any provisions of this RFQ, these exceptions must be specifically and clearly identified by Section in Respondent’s Qualification in response to this RFQ and Respondent’s proposed alternative must also be provided in the Qualification. Respondents cannot take a ‘blanket exception’ to this entire RFQ. If any Respondent takes a blanket exception to this entire RFQ or does not provide proposed alternative language, the Respondent’s Qualification may be disqualified from further consideration. Any exception may result in the Contract not being awarded to the Respondent.
4.6 QUALIFICATION SUBMISSION
4.6.1 All Qualifications shall be received and documented in the Purchasing Office at TSU prior to the stated deadline date specified in the Schedule of Events above. TSU reserves the right to reject late submittals.
4.6.2 Qualifications should be placed in a separate envelope or package and correctly identified with the RFQ number and submittal deadline/RFQ opening date and time. It is Respondent’s responsibility to appropriately
Page | 10 mark and deliver their Qualification response to Mr. Britt in the Purchasing Office located in Hannah Hall, suite 333, by the specified date and time. A U.S. Postal Service (USPS) postmark or round validation stamp; a mail receipt with the date of mailing, stamped by the USPS; a dated shipping label, invoice, or receipt from a commercial carrier; or any other documentation in lieu of the on-site time stamp WILL NOT be accepted.
4.6.3 Telephone, email and facsimile Qualification responses will not be accepted.
4.6.4 Receipt of all addenda to this RFQ should be acknowledged by returning a signed copy of each addendum with the submitted Qualification.
4.6.5 The TSU Standard Terms and Conditions is included in this solicitation for your convenience with the thought that you can present it to your legal department, and they can begin reviewing them, in order to speed up possible negotiations.
4.7 DELIVERY OF QUALIFICATIONS
Qualifications are commonly shipped to TSU by one of the following methods: U.S. Postal Service, Fed Ex Overnight
/ Express Mail, or Hand Delivery (recommended).
** Please instruct your delivery service to avoid delivering your submittal to the University’s Warehouse / Central
Receiving as this will delay delivery and could ultimately result in your response being late; and consequently rejected.
All solicitation responses must be delivered to either the TSU Post Office or the TSU Purchasing Office located in room 333 in Hannah Hall, our main administration building.
4.8 QUALIFICATION OPENING
4.8.1 Qualifications will be opened by the assigned buyer in their office or their department conference room, whichever is most appropriate and available.
4.8.2 All submitted Qualifications become the property of TSU after the RFQ submittal deadline. The submitted
Qualifications and accompanying documentation will not be returned.
4.8.3 Qualifications submitted shall constitute a Qualification for a period of ninety (90) days or until selection is made by TSU, whichever occurs earlier.
4.9 QUALIFICATION EVALUATION AND AWARD
4.9.1 TSU shall award a contract to a Respondent whose Qualification is considered to provide the best value to the
State of Texas and Texas Southern University, as defined by Tex. Government Code, Section 2155.074.
4.9.2 A committee will be established to evaluate the Qualifications. The committee will include employees of TSU and other persons invited by TSU to participate.
4.9.3 TSU reserves the right to award contract(s) without any negotiations, without a BAFO, and/or TSU reserves the right to not make an award at all.
Page | 11
4.9.4 The Respondent is strongly encouraged to provide its best price in its Qualification because TSU makes absolutely no guarantee that there will be any opportunity to negotiate or provide alternative pricing at any point during the RFQ process.
4.9.5 The evaluation committee will determine best value by applying the following criteria and assigned weighted values:
Criteria Weight
Criterion 1: Experience of the Firm or Person 50%
Criterion 2: Qualifications of Personnel 50%
4.9.6 The evaluation committee will determine if Best and Final Qualification (BAFO) are necessary. Award of a contract may be made without a BAFO, so you are encouraged to submit your best Qualification initially. A request for a BAFO is at the sole discretion of TSU and if requested, will be extended in writing.
4.9.7 TSU reserves the right to award to multiple vendors if deemed in the best interest of the University.
End of Section IV
Page | 12
EXHIBIT A
EXECUTION OFFFER
NOTE: THIS EXHIBIT MUST BE SIGNED AND RETURNED WITH THE QUALIFICATION.
QUALIFICATIONS THAT DO NOT INCLUDE THIS EXHIBIT WILL BE DISQUALIFIED. THE
QUALIFICATION SHALL BE VOID IF FALSE STATEMENTS ARE CONTAINED IN THIS
EXHIBIT.
By signature hereon, Respondent certifies that:
All statements and information prepared and submitted in the response to this RFQ are current, complete, and accurate.
Respondent has not given, offered to give, nor intends to give at any time hereafter, any economic opportunity, future employment, gift, loan, gratuity, special discount, trip, favor, or service to a public servant in connection with the submitted response.
Neither Respondent nor the corporation, partnership, or institution represented by Respondent or anyone acting for such respondent, corporation, or institution has (1) violated the antitrust laws of the State of
Texas under Texas Business & Commerce Code, Chapter 15, or the federal antitrust laws; or (2) communicated the contents of this Qualification either directly or indirectly to any competitor or any other person engaged in the same line of business during the procurement process for this RFQ.
When a Texas business address shown hereon that address is, in fact, the legal business address of
Respondent and Respondent qualifies as a Texas Resident Bidder under 1 TAC § 111.2.
Under Government Code § 2155.004, no person who prepared the specifications or this RFQ has any financial interest in Respondent’s Qualification. If Respondent is not eligible, then any contract resulting from this RFQ shall be immediately terminated. Furthermore, “under Section 2155.004, Government
Code, the vendor [Respondent] certifies that the individual or business entity named in this Qualification or contract is not ineligible to receive the specified contract and acknowledges that this contract May be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.”
Under Family Code § 231.006, relating to child support obligations, Respondent and any other individual or business entity named in this solicitation are eligible to receive the specified payment and acknowledge that this contract May be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.
Under Government Code § 669.003, relating to contracting with an executive of a state agency, Respondent represents that no person who, in the past four years, served as an executive of the Texas
Comptroller of Public Accounts, Texas Southern University or any other state agency, was involved with or has any interest in this Qualification or any contract resulting from this RFQ. If Respondent employs or has used the services of a former executive head of Texas Southern University or other state agency, then
Respondent shall provide the following information: Name of former executive, name of state agency, date of separation from state agency, position with Respondent, and date of employment with
Respondent.
Respondent agrees that any payments due under this contract will be applied towards any debt, including but not limited to delinquent taxes and child support that is owed to the State of Texas.
Page | 13
Texas Southern University is federally mandated to adhere to the directions provided in the
President’s Executive Order (EO) 13224, Executive Order on Terrorist Financing – Blocking Property and Prohibiting Transactions With Persons Who Commit, Threaten to Commit, or Support Terrorism, effective 9/24/2001 and any subsequent changes made to it via cross- referencing respondents/vendors with the Federal General Services Administration’s System for Award Management (SAM), https://www.sam.gov/SAM/ , which is inclusive of the United States Treasury’s Office of Foreign
Assets Control (OFAC) Specially Designated National (SDN) list.
Respondent certifies that the responding entity and its principals are eligible to participate in this transaction and have not been subjected to suspension, debarment, or similar ineligibility determined by any federal, state or local governmental entity and that Respondent is in compliance with the State of
Texas statutes and rules relating to procurement and that Respondent is not listed on the federal government's terrorism watch list as described in Executive Order 13224. Entities ineligible for federal procurement are listed at https://www.sam.gov/SAM/
Under Section 2155.006(b) of the Texas Government Code, a state agency May not accept a Qualification or award a contract, including a contract for which purchasing authority is delegated to a state agency, that includes proposed financial participation by a person who, during the five- year period preceding the date of the Qualification or award, has been: (1) convicted of violating a federal law in connection with a contract awarded by the federal government for relief, recovery, or reconstruction efforts as a result of
Hurricane Rita, as defined by Section 39.459, Utilities Code, Hurricane Katrina, or any other disaster occurring after September 24, 2005; or (2) assessed a penalty in a federal civil or administrative enforcement action in connection with a contract awarded by the federal government for relief, recovery, or reconstruction efforts as a result of Hurricane Rita, as defined by Section 39.459, Utilities Code, Hurricane Katrina, or any other disaster occurring after September 24, 2005. Under Section 2155.006 of the Texas Government Code, the respondent certifies that the individual or business entity named in this
Qualification is not ineligible to receive the specified contract and acknowledges that any contract resulting from this RFQ May be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.
Pursuant to Section 2262.003 of the Texas Government Code, the state auditor May conduct an audit or investigation of the vendor or any other entity or person receiving funds from the state directly under this contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this contract. The acceptance of funds by the Respondent or any other entity or person directly under this contract or indirectly through a subcontract under this contract acts as acceptance of the authority of the state auditor, under the direction of the legislative audit committee, to conduct an audit or investigation in connection with those funds. Under the direction of the legislative audit committee, the Respondent or other entity that is the subject of an audit or investigation by the state auditor must provide the state auditor with access to any information the state auditor considers relevant to the investigation or audit. Respondent will ensure that this clause concerning the authority to audit funds received indirectly by subcontractors through the vendor and the requirement to cooperate is included in any subcontract it awards.
The Respondent represents that, to the extent this Solicitation constitutes a contract for goods or services within the meaning of Section 2270.002 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, solely for purposes of compliance with Chapter 2270 of the Texas Government Code, and subject to applicable Federal law, Respondent (1) does not boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the term of this Agreement.
The term “boycott Israel” as used in this paragraph has the meaning assigned to it in Section 808.001 of the Texas Government Code, as amended.
https://www.sam.gov/SAM/ https://www.sam.gov/SAM/
PREFERENCES
See Section 2.38 of the State of Texas Procurement Manual regarding preferences. Check below to claim a preference under 34 TAC Rule 20.38
( ) Supplies, materials, or equipment produced in TX or offered by TX bidder or TX bidder that is owned by a service-disabled veteran ( ) Agricultural products produced or grown in TX
( ) Agricultural products and services offered by TX bidders
( ) USA produced supplies, materials, or equipment ( ) Products of persons with mental or physical disabilities
( ) Products made of recycled, remanufactured, or environmentally sensitive materials including recycled steel ( ) Energy Efficient Products
( ) Rubberized asphalt materials
( ) Recycled motor oil and lubricants
( ) Products produced at facilities located on formerly contaminated property
( ) Products and services from economically depressed or blighted areas ( ) Vendors that meet or exceed air quality standards
( ) Recycled or Reused Computer Equipment of Other Manufacturers
( ) Foods of Higher Nutritional Value
Respondent represents and warrants that the individual signing this Execution of Offer is authorized to sign this document on behalf of Respondent and to bind Respondent under any contract resulting from this Qualification.
End of Exhibit A
End of the solicitation
RESPONDENT (COMPANY):
SIGNATURE
NAME (TYPED/PRINTED)
TITLE:
EMAIL ADDRESS:
PHYSICAL ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
TELEPHONE:
FAX:
TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER:
DATE:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .