ERAE Attachment 1 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 39 KB Posted

Attached to
Eastern Regional Architecture and Engineering (“ERAE”) Synopsis Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GRC024R0006_Synopsis
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Glenn Research Center

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the Eastern Regional Architecture and Engineering (ERAE) 80GRC024R0006 contract opportunity. The PPQ instructions outline the process for customer evaluators to complete Sections II and III of the questionnaire, which cover information about the A-E contractor's past performance, including quality of work, compliance with schedules, management effectiveness, and customer satisfaction. The completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officer by August 22, 2024.

The related federal contract opportunity is for Architect-Engineer (A-E) and related services across various project phases for NASA's Eastern Regional Area of Operations, including Glenn Research Center, Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility, Goddard Space Flight Center, Wallops Flight Facility, and Langley Research Center. This is a multiple award contract opportunity to be procured under the Brooks A-E Act. The NAICS code is 541330 with a $25.5 million small business size standard. This is a synopsis, not a solicitation or Request for Proposal, and interested parties must submit a Standard Form (SF) 330, Architect-Engineer Qualifications.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Eastern Regional Architecture and Engineering (“ERAE”) Synopsis, newest first.
File Type Posted
ERAE Synopsis Amendment 0001 (signed).pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Government Responses.pdf PDF
ERAE Attachment 2 Synopsis Provisions.pdf PDF
80GRC024R0006 ERAE Synopsis 07182024.pdf PDF
ERAE Attachment 3 Scope of Services.pdf PDF
ERAE Attachment 4 Standard Form (SF) 330 Parts I and II.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Eastern Regional Architecture and Engineering (ERAE)

80GRC024R0006

ATTACHMENT 1: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

INSTRUCTIONS AND RATING GUIDELINES

Instructions

This evaluation is to be completed as indicated below. The A-E team must provide one evaluation for each past performance customer contact identified in section F of the SF 330. This package consists of the following:

SectionDescriptionWho Completes
Section IBasic Contract InformationArchitect & Engineer team
being evaluated.
Section IIEvaluator Identification InformationCustomer Evaluator
Section IIIA-E Past Performance QuestionnaireCustomer Evaluator

Past Performance Questionnaires will not be accepted directly from the A-E team. Customer Evaluators must send evaluations directly to the Contracting Officer. The Customer Evaluator must submit their completed questionnaires to the addresses listed below, to arrive no later than 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET) on August 22, 2024.

Name:Stephanie C. D’Anniballe
Email Address:stephanie.c.d’anniballe@nasa.gov

AND

Name:John A. Christel
Email Address:john.a.christel@nasa.gov

Section I To be completed by the A-E team submitting qualifications for evaluation.

A-E Team Name:

Contract Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Award Date:

Contract Completion Date:

Point of Contact (Customer Evaluator) Name/Address/Office Phone Number:

Brief Description of Work Performed:

Section II To be completed by Customer Evaluator NASA will NOT divulge the names of the individuals providing reference information about an A-E team’s past performance.

Name of A-E Contractor Being Evaluated:

A-E Contractor’s Status (Prime or Sub-Consultant):

A-E Contract Number:

Description of A-E Services Provided:

A-E Contract Period of Performance:

A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Award:
$
A-E Contract or Subcontract Value at Completion:
$

For design contracts which were completed by the A-E team and awarded for construction

1) The final estimated construction contract award price

2) The actual construction award price

1) $

2) $

Evaluator’s Company/Agency Name:

Evaluator’s Name (Typed/Printed):

Evaluator’s Signature:

Phone Number:

Facsimile Number:

E-mail address:

Dates of Involvement in Contract:

Date Questionnaire Completed:

Section III

ARCHITECT-ENGINEER PAST PERFORMANCE REPORT

RATING DEFINITIONS

For each question below, please rate the contractor from Unsatisfactory to Excellent (as defined below) and please elaborate on the specifics of your rating in the Narrative Summary. A rating of Not Applicable should be used if either the question is not applicable or the answer is unknown. The Not Applicable rating is neutral and will have no impact on the assessment of Past Performance. The Contracting Officer may contact the respondent for additional information, if needed.

Quality of Work
Compliance with Performance Schedules
Management Effectiveness

Excellent

There were no quality problems.
There were no delays.
Responses to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were effective and responsive.

Good

Technical issues did not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Delays did not impact achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were usually effective and responsive.

Fair

Technical issues required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Delays required minor Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were somewhat effective and responsive.

Poor

Technical issues required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Delays required major Client resources to ensure achievement of contract requirements.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were marginally effective and responsive.

Unsatisfactory

Non-conformances or technical issues compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite use of Client’s resources.
Delays compromised the achievement of contract requirements, despite the use of Client’s resources.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues were not effective and not responsive.

Section III (Cont’d)

Item

FACTORS/RATINGS

Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Unsatisfactory
Not Applicable

Quality of Work

1
Overall skill level & technical competence of A-E’s personnel
2
Ability to identify risk factors and alternatives for alleviating risk
3
Ability to identify and solve problems expeditiously
4
Overall quality of delivered products

Compliance with Performance Schedules

5
Ability to complete major tasks or key project milestones on schedule
6
Ability to provide timely reports and documentation submittals

Management Effectiveness

7
Ability to effectively coordinate, integrate & manage subcontractors
8
Ability of management team to show innovation and a proactive approach to problem identification and resolution
9
Ability to effectively interface with the Customer’s staff
10
Ability to respond to customer changes
11
Ability to meet project requirements
12
Ability to effectively communicate pertinent issues throughout the contract

Customer Satisfaction

13
How would you rate the A-E’s overall management performance on this contract
14
How would you rate the A-E’s overall technical performance on this contract
15
Would you use this A-E again? (If “No”, please comment in the Narrative Summary)
YES
No

Section III (Cont’d)

NARRATIVE SUMMARY (Use this section to elaborate on the specifics of the rating and to explain additional information not included above)

Item
Comments

PAST PERFORMANCE TRANSMITTAL LETTER - SAMPLE

This acquisition is for Architect-Engineer (A-E) and related services across all project phases including but not limited to: preparation of conceptual engineering studies, final facility building and infrastructure designs, permitting, preliminary engineering reports, Engineering Services During Construction (ESDC), and activation and commissioning for the following NASA locations; Glenn Research Center (GRC); Neil A. Armstrong Test Facility (ATF); Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC); Wallops Flight Facility (WFF); Langley Research Center (LaRC); with the possibility of performance at other NASA assets and Centers nationwide. This regional multiple award contract will provide a highly flexible contracting vehicle for participating Centers.

A-E CONTRACTOR LETTER: FORMAT

[Date of Letter] [Name and Address of A-E’s Customer] Attention: [Name and Designation of Customer Evaluator]

Dear [Customer Contact Name]:

We are currently responding to the NASA Glenn Research Center synopsis 80GRC024R0006. NASA is requesting that customers of entities responding to the synopsis participate in the evaluation process. We have included our project for your company/agency as a past performance reference. An Architect-Engineer Past Performance Report is enclosed. We respectfully request that you complete Sections II and III of the enclosed evaluation and return the signed, completed questionnaire to the Contracting Officer at either address listed below. Your completed questionnaire must arrive no later than 5:00 pm Eastern Time (ET) on August 22, 2024.

Name:Stephanie C. D’Anniballe
Email Address:stephanie.c.d’anniballe@nasa.gov

Or

Name:John A. Christel
Email Address:john.a.christel@nasa.gov

In order to maintain the integrity of this process, DO NOT return the Past Performance Report to us. Return it to the email or mailing address listed above.

Please direct any questions to the Contracting Officer, Stephanie C. D’Anniballe at stephanie.c.d’anniballe@nasa.gov and/or Contract Specialist, John A. Christel at john.a.christel@nasa.gov.

Sincerely, [Name of Signer] [Designation of Signer]

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .