ENGINEERING Scoring Sheet.pdf

PDF 134 KB Posted

Attached to
RFP- ENGINEERING AND/OR ARCHITECTURAL GRANT SERVICES
Solicitation number
PE-66397-NONST-2024-000000003
Issued by
Seminole County, Georgia

About this file

This document is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion scoring sheet used to evaluate and select a firm for a state or local government contract opportunity. The evaluation criteria includes the firm's ability to provide the necessary disciplines, experience with similar construction projects, key personnel experience, quality of references, experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and price competitiveness. The firm must be able to meet project deadlines and carry Errors and Omissions insurance. The scoring sheet allows the reviewer to assess and assign points to each criterion, with a total maximum score possible.

The document does not provide additional details about the specific contract opportunity, such as the scope of work, project overview, response due dates, award information, or contract term. Pricing terms, funding requirements and sources, and other pertinent commercial details are also not included in this scoring sheet.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFP _ ENG.docx DOCX document
Engineering statement of qualifications.pdf PDF
Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL

RATINGS CRITERION

CONTACT:

NAME OF FIRM:

FIRM ADDRESS:

Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION

POOR

GOOD

EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.

0 1 2 _________

2.

Firm’s experience with this type of construction.

0 1 2 _________

3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________

4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________

5. Has Firm had experience with Community

Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?

0 1 2

6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________

TOTAL POINTS

Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No

COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:

NAME:

DATE OF REVIEW:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .