Engineering Scoring Sheet
133 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP Engineering Grant Services
- Solicitation number
- 202302
- Issued by
- Bartow County, Georgia
About this file
This is an Engineering Scoring Sheet used by the State of Georgia to evaluate architectural and engineering firms responding to an RFP for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Grant Services. The scoring instrument assesses qualified engineering firms licensed in Georgia that will provide preliminary design services for a potential FY2023 CDBG-funded project focused on water, sewage, streets, and drainage infrastructure. Respondents must submit statements of qualifications and proposals demonstrating strong experience assisting local governments with CDBG program implementation. The draft Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) is required no later than April 10, 2023. The RFP requests information including firm history and resources, CDBG/EIP/RDF experience, key personnel qualifications, current workload, scope of services proposed, references from similar projects, fees associated with preliminary engineering services and design/construction management services, and proof of Errors and Omissions insurance coverage.
The evaluation criteria consist of six factors scored on a zero to two-point scale: ability to provide necessary disciplines, firm experience with the construction type, key personnel experience, quality of references, prior CDBG project experience, and price competitiveness. Additional evaluation requirements include verification that the firm can meet the PER/PAR deadline and confirmation of current Errors and Omissions insurance. Responding firms must submit a Statement of Qualifications Form and are encouraged to include a Section 3 Certification Form if claiming Section 3 Business Concern status under HUD Act of 1968 requirements. The contract contemplates preliminary engineering services for the application phase with potential continuation for design and construction management services if the project receives CDBG funding.
Text of this file
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
RATINGS CRITERION
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2 _________
2.
Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
0 1 2 _________
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________
4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________
5. Has Firm had experience with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?
0 1 2
6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Award Information | — | |
| Engineering Statement of Quali | — | |
| Section 3 Solicitation Package | — |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .