Engineering_Architect Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- City of Surrency FY 2024 Engineering RFP
- Solicitation number
- PE-60120-NONST-2024-000000002
- Issued by
- Appling County, Georgia
About this file
This document is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion sheet for a state or local government contract opportunity. The sheet is used to evaluate and score architectural and engineering firms based on several criteria, including their ability to provide the necessary disciplines, their experience with this type of construction, the experience of their key personnel, the quality of their references, their experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and the competitiveness of their pricing. The firm must also indicate whether they can meet the project's deadline and if they carry Errors and Omissions insurance.
The scoring sheet allows the reviewing agency to assign points ranging from 0 to 2 for each of the six criteria, with a total possible score of 12 points. The firm's selection appears to be based on the total points earned, as well as their ability to meet the project's deadline and their insurance coverage.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering_Architectural statement of qualif.pdf | ||
| Umbrella RFP _ Engineering.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
RATINGS CRITERION
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2 _________
2.
Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
0 1 2 _________
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________
4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________
5. Has Firm had experience with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?
0 1 2
6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .