Engineering_Architect Scoring Sheet.pdf

PDF 134 KB Posted

Attached to
CDBG Engineering Services
Solicitation number
PE-60350-NONST-2026-000000015
Issued by
Bacon County, Georgia

About this file

This is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion scoring sheet used by the State of Georgia for evaluating engineering and architectural firms responding to a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Engineering Services solicitation. The evaluation form is designed to assess qualified engineering firms capable of providing preliminary engineering reports (PER), final design, and construction administration services for federally assisted projects utilizing CDBG funding. The scoring sheet does not specify project quantities, response dates, due dates, site visits, or bidder meetings, as it functions as an internal evaluation tool rather than a public notice document.

The scoring sheet uses a point-based evaluation system with six selection criteria, each rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent): ability to provide necessary disciplines, firm experience with the type of construction, key personnel experience, quality of reference information, prior CDBG project experience, and price competitiveness. Additional evaluation factors include whether the firm can meet PER/PAR deadlines and whether the firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance. The maximum total points available is 12. The evaluation process requires reviewers to document the firm name, address, contact information, comments on selection rationale, reviewer name, and review date. Funding for this initiative comes from the Community Development Block Grant program, and responding firms are encouraged to be Section 3 Business Concerns as defined under the HUD Act of 1968.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Engineering_Architectural statement of qualif.pdf PDF
Engineering RFQ Notice.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL

RATINGS CRITERION

CONTACT:

NAME OF FIRM:

FIRM ADDRESS:

Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion

CIRCLE POINTS

CRITERION

POOR

GOOD

EXCELLENT

POINTS

ASSIGNED

1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.

0 1 2 _________

2.

Firm’s experience with this type of construction.

0 1 2 _________

3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________

4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________

5. Has Firm had experience with Community

Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?

0 1 2

6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________

TOTAL POINTS

Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No

Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No

COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:

NAME:

DATE OF REVIEW:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .