Engineering_Architect Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CDBG Engineering Services
- Solicitation number
- PE-60350-NONST-2026-000000015
- Issued by
- Bacon County, Georgia
About this file
This is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion scoring sheet used by the State of Georgia for evaluating engineering and architectural firms responding to a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Engineering Services solicitation. The evaluation form is designed to assess qualified engineering firms capable of providing preliminary engineering reports (PER), final design, and construction administration services for federally assisted projects utilizing CDBG funding. The scoring sheet does not specify project quantities, response dates, due dates, site visits, or bidder meetings, as it functions as an internal evaluation tool rather than a public notice document.
The scoring sheet uses a point-based evaluation system with six selection criteria, each rated on a scale of 0 to 2 points (Poor, Good, or Excellent): ability to provide necessary disciplines, firm experience with the type of construction, key personnel experience, quality of reference information, prior CDBG project experience, and price competitiveness. Additional evaluation factors include whether the firm can meet PER/PAR deadlines and whether the firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance. The maximum total points available is 12. The evaluation process requires reviewers to document the firm name, address, contact information, comments on selection rationale, reviewer name, and review date. Funding for this initiative comes from the Community Development Block Grant program, and responding firms are encouraged to be Section 3 Business Concerns as defined under the HUD Act of 1968.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering_Architectural statement of qualif.pdf | ||
| Engineering RFQ Notice.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
RATINGS CRITERION
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2 _________
2.
Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
0 1 2 _________
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________
4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________
5. Has Firm had experience with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?
0 1 2
6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .