Engineering_Architect Scoring Sheet.pdf
PDF 134 KB Posted
- Attached to
- City of Soperton FY 2024 Engineering RFP
- Solicitation number
- PE-66419-NONST-2024-000000004
- Issued by
- Union County, Georgia
About this file
This document is an Engineering/Architectural Ratings Criterion form for evaluating firms interested in a state or local government contract opportunity. The form evaluates firms based on 6 criteria: 1) Ability to provide necessary disciplines, 2) Firm's experience with this type of construction, 3) Key personnel experience, 4) Quality of reference information, 5) Experience with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects, and 6) Competitiveness of pricing. Firms are scored on a scale of 0-2 for each criterion, with a total possible score of 12 points. The form also indicates whether the firm can meet the project deadline and whether the firm carries errors and omissions insurance. Comments can be provided on why the firm should be selected.
The document does not provide details on the specific contract opportunity, such as the scope of work, project overview, response due dates, award information, or contract term. No information is given on pricing terms, set-asides, incumbent vendors, funding sources, or other salient commercial details.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering_Architectural statement of qualif.pdf | ||
| Umbrella RFP _ Engineering.docx | DOCX document | |
| Section 3 Solicitation Package.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURAL
RATINGS CRITERION
CONTACT:
NAME OF FIRM:
FIRM ADDRESS:
Evaluate the Architectural and/or Engineering Firm based on the points assigned to each of the following selection criterion
CIRCLE POINTS
CRITERION
POOR
GOOD
EXCELLENT
POINTS
ASSIGNED
1. Ability to provide the disciplines necessary for this project.
0 1 2 _________
2.
Firm’s experience with this type of construction.
0 1 2 _________
3. Key personnel experience with this type of construction 0 1 2 _________
4. Quality of reference information. 0 1 2 _________
5. Has Firm had experience with Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) projects?
0 1 2
6. Is price competitive? 0 1 2 _________
TOTAL POINTS
Firm can meet PER/PAR deadline? ____ Yes ____ No
Firm carries Errors and Omissions insurance? ____ Yes ____ No
COMMENTS ON WHY FIRM SHOULD BE SELECTED:
NAME:
DATE OF REVIEW:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .