RFP Questions-Answers.pdf
PDF 228 KB Posted
- Attached to
- PIAAC National Supplement Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- ED-IES-12-R-0078
About this file
The attached document includes the questions submitted by 1pm on July 26 2012 as requested in the RFP along with the responses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Solicitation-SF33.pdf | ||
| Attachment A-PWS.pdf | ||
| Past Performance Form.pdf | ||
| Attachment B- QASP.pdf | ||
| Attachment E.pdf | ||
| Attachment F - Small Business Subcontracting Plan Review.pdf | ||
| Attachment C - Billing Instructions.pdf | ||
| PIAAC PWS draft 2012.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions/Answers regarding RFP # ED-IES-12-R-0078 that were due by 1pm, July 26, 2012
1. Page 58 of the solicitation states that “Offerors should also prepare a budget for the 6 month option to extend services (FAR Clause 52.215-8) and for the option to extend the term of the contract for an additional 60 months (FAR Clause 52.217-9).” Please confirm that offerors are to submit detailed cost/price budgets for a base 5-year period plus a 6-month option to extend services plus an option to extend the contract 60 months. If so, what scope of work and/or level of effort should offerors assume for the 60-month option to extend the contract?
Yes, please submit 3 separate budgets as noted above. In budgeting for an optional 60-month extension, offerors should assume a scope of work consistent with the core scope of work.
2. Page 38 of the PWS refers to a bidders website. We are unable to locate the link to this site. Please provide the URL/link to this site.
Reference to a bidders website is an error. There is no bidders website. Please disregard.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .