Attachment_2_HESSIT_Self-Scoring_Worksheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 52 KB Posted Mar 9, 2017

Attached to: HUDs Strategic Sourcing Initiative for Training (HESSIT)
Solicitation number: DU208WR-17-R-0004
Issued by: Department of Housing and Urban Development Denver Regional Office

About this file

From the source

J. 2 HESSIT Self-Scoring Worksheet

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Attachment_6_HESSIT_Socio-Economic_Participation_Plan.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_11_HESSIT_Price_Proposal_Template_Final.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_9_QASP_Final_Draft.doc	DOC document	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_7_HESSIT_Relevant_Experience_Project_Template.docx	DOCX document	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_10_HUD_LEARN_Evaluation_V2_Draft.pdf	PDF	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_4_HESSIT_Self-Scoring_Worksheet_Sample.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 9, 2017
HESSIT_Draft_Section_C_through_M.doc	DOC document	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_8_HESSIT_Solicitation_Past_Performance_Rating_Form.docx	DOCX document	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_3_HESSIT_Self-Scoring_Worksheet_-_Small_Business_Leadership_Pool.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_5_HESSIT_Pool_Qualification,_Training_Delivery_Methods_and_Certification_Attachment.docx	DOCX document	Mar 9, 2017
Attachment_1_HESSIT_Solicitation_PROPOSAL_CHECKLIST.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Mar 9, 2017

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

HESSIT

Attachment J.2	HESSIT
	SOLICITATION No.

	SELF SCORING WORKSHEET FOR PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
Note: See Sample in Section J.4, Attachment (4) Self-Scoring Worksheet Sample
and Instructions set forth in Section L.4.

OFFEROR NAME: [FILL IN OFFEROR NAME HERE]
Training Pool/Subpool offered by this Scorecard
Section	Pass/Fail Element	Enter Pass or Fail for each element as applicable
M.4.1.1.	SF-33 and Amendments
M.4.1.2.	Proposal Checklist
M.4.1.3.	Completed Self-Scoring Worksheet
M.4.1.5.	SAM Registration with EPLS Information
M.4.1.7.	Representations and Certifications
M.4.1.8.	Dun & Bradstreet Comprehensive Report with Viability Score of 5 or Lower
M.4.2.2.	3 Different Relevant Projects Submitted
M.4.2.3.	Projects were submitted on the Relevant Project Experience template
M.4.2.3.	Each project was completed within the past three (3) years prior to the solicitation closing date; or, is ongoing with at least one (1) year of performance completed prior to the solicitation closing date.
M.4.2.3.	Each project reflects performance with any combination of U.S. Federal Government, U.S. State Government, and Non-Government/Commercial.
M.4.2.3.	Each project is located within the Contiguous United Stated to include Alaska and Hawaii and the United States territories of Puerto Rico and Guam.
	Each project provides:
M.4.2.3.	The training courses and services provided relevant to the training pool described in Scope of Services (Section C) for both required and optional services
M.4.2.3.	Geographic coverage including places of performance
M.4.2.3.	Performance period (including base and options)
M.4.2.3.	Total dollar value (including base and options)
M.4.2.3.	Any volume discounts awarded at the master contract/BPA level
M.4.2.3.	Mobile technology utilized in delivering the training
M.4.2.3.	A complete, clear, concise detailed statement of the description of training services covered in the project, including how the offeror:
	· provided the services,
	· managed the overall project,
	· managed personnel,
	· managed subcontractors,
	· recruited, hired, and retained personnel,
	· addressed any significant issues, what corrective action was taken and whether the contract was terminated.
M.4.3.1.1.	Socio-economic -The offeror failed to submit the Socioeconomic Participation Template
M.4.3.1.1.	Socio-economic -The offeror is a large business and failed to provide sufficient rationale that indicates no subcontracting opportunities exist
M.4.3.1.1.	Socio-economic -The offeror is a large business proposing to subcontract less than 30% of the cost of the contract to small business
M.4.3.1.1.	Socio-economic - The offeror is a business proposing to subcontract more than 80% of the cost of the contract
M.4.3.1.5.	Socio-economic - Meaningful Letters of Commitment
M.4.4.1.	Key Personnel Resumes - National Account Manager and Contracts Manager only
M.4.4.2.	Key Personnel Letters of Commitment - National Account Manager and Contracts Manager only
M.4.5.1.	Professional Compensation Plan
M.4.6.1.	Uncompensated Overtime Policy
M.4.7.	Past Performance Surveys were submitted
M.4.7.	Average Past Performance is 3.0 or above
M.4.8.1.	Professional Training Pool only - did the offeror provide a Defense Acquisition University certification?

Section	Element	Point Value	Enter Yes OR No for each question as applicable	Score
M.4.2.2.	VOLUME 3 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
L.4.3.2.1	Relevant Experience under the HESSIT NAICS or PSC Code:
	Is EACH Project reported under any NAICS code or PSC Code identified in Section L.5.1.2.? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: Project A	150		0
	Project 2: Project B	150		0
	Project 3: Project C	150		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	150		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.1ONLY:			0
M.4.2.4.1.	Indvidual Project Value:
	Does EACH Project represent a total contract value of $750K OR MORE but, a total contract value of LESS THAN $2M including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	50		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	50		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	50		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	50		0
	Does EACH Project represent a total contract value of $2M OR MORE but, a total contract value of LESS THAN $4M, including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: Project A	100		0
	Project 2: Project B	100		0
	Project 3: Project C	100		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	100		0
	Does EACH Project represent a total contract value of $4M OR MORE including Options? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: Project A	150		0
	Project 2: Project B	150		0
	Project 3: Project C	150		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	150		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.2 ONLY:			0
M.4.2.4.2.	Relevant Experience to a U.S. Federal Government customer:
	Is EACH Project describing performance to a U.S. Federal Government customer as identified in Section L.4.3.2.3.? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	150		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	150		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	150		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	150		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.3. ONLY:			0
M.4.2.4.3.	Multiple Locations (Places of Performance):
	Does EACH Project have performance in AT LEAST 5 but NO MORE THAN 10 different locations? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	50		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	50		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	50		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	50		0
	Does EACH Project have performance in 10 OR MORE different locations? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	100		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	100		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	100		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	100		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.4 ONLY:			0
M.4.2.4.5.	Mobile Technology
	Do the offeror's relevant projects indicate use of the following methods of mobile technology in the delivery of training? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH type of mobile technology.
	Video Teleconferencing (VTC)	150		0
	Remote Device Service Delivery	150		0
	Blended Training (Instructor led and online)	100		0
	Adobe Connect	100		0
	Google Hangout Air	75		0
	Live Meeting	50		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.5 ONLY:			0
M.4.2.4.4.	Relevant Experience Under Different Types of Acquisition Vehicles
	Has the Offeror has been awarded AT LEAST 1 non-Multiple Award Contract or Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 16.7) with AT LEAST 50 courses delivered? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	50		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	50		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	50		0
	Has the Offeror has been awarded AT LEAST 1 Multiple Award Blanket Purchase Agreement (FAR 8.405-3 or FAR 16.7), with AT LEAST 20 total Purchase or Task Order Awards or SF-182s issued, and 50 courses delivered? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	100		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	100		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	100		0
	Has the Offeror has been awarded AT LEAST 1 Multiple Award IDIQ Contract (FAR 16.501-1), with AT LEAST 20 total Purchase or Task Order Awards or SF-182s issued, and 50 classes delivered? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	150		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	150		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	150		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.2.5. ONLY:			0
M.4.3.1.3.	Socio-Economic Participation:
	Is the offeror a large business and is proposing to subcontract more than 30% and less than 80% of the cost of the contract to small business? Type the word Yes or No in Column D.
		50		0
	Is the offeror a small business and is proposing to subcontract up to 80% of the cost of the contract to small business? Type the word Yes or No in Column D.
		150		0
	Does the offeror's socio-economic status include: Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH socio-economic status.
	8a Small Business	50		0
	HUBZone Small Business	50		0
	Small Disadvantaged Business	50		0
	Women-Owned Small Business	50		0
	Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business	50		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.3.3.1 ONLY:			0
M.4.7.	VOLUME 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE
M.4.7.2.	Relevant Experience Projects (Past Performance)
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 3.50 and 3.74? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	350		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	350		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	350		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	350		0
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 3.75 and 3.99? Type the word "Yes" or "No" in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	450		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	450		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	450		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	450		0
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.00 and 4.24? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	550		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	550		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	550		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	550		0
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.25 and 4.49? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	650		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	650		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	650		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	650		0
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.50 and 4.74? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: Project A	750		0
	Project 2: Project B	750		0
	Project 3: Project C	750		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	750		0
	Does EACH Project Average a Past Performance Score between 4.75 and 5.00? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project.
	Project 1: COTS Project A	850		0
	Project 2: COTS Project B	850		0
	Project 3: COTS Project C	850		0
	Project 4: Development and Customization Project D	850		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTION L.4.4.1 through L.4.4.2. ONLY:			0
M.4.8.	VOLUME 5 – CERTIFICATIONS
M.4.8.2.	Industry Certifications:
	Does the Offeror have each of the following? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH Certification.
	ISO 9001:2008 Certification	100		0
	NASBA Certification	100		0
	SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR SECTIONS L.4.5.2.1. through L.4.5.2.2 ONLY:			0
	TOTAL POINTS SCORED:			- 0

Sheet3

Pass

Fail

Sheet1

Professional

Technical

General (Core)

Leadership (Unrestricted)

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.