Report_1_NEPA.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
Shiloh National Military Park
Solicitation number
DTFH71-16-B-00027
Issued by

About this file

Report 1_NEPA

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
ROBO_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
Report_3_Pavement_Condition_Survey.pdf PDF
VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf PDF
Plans_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf PDF
Report_2_SWPPP.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Synopsis_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

On the basis of the environmental impact infonnation in the statutory compliance file, with rvhich I arn familiar. I bclieve tlie proiect should be categorically excluded fiom further NEPA analysis.

Prepared by:

f-zz - !{ Date

Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Hi ghway Adrninistration Eastem Federal Lands Highway Division

On the basis of the environmental impact information in the statutory compliance file, with which l arn familiar, I arr categorically excluding the described project from frrther NEPA analysis. No exceptional circumstances (i.e., all boxes in the ESF are marked "no") or conditions apply and the action is fully described in 23 CFR 771.117 Categorical Exclusions.

..i n

I

Date Envifonrnental Compliance Specialist Fedelral Hi ghway Adrninistration Eastem Federal Lands Highway Division i Il t I

7/)2/rJ- Dale Wilkerson Superintendent Shiloh National Military Park

TENNESSEE HISTORICAL COMMISSION

2941 LEBANON ROAD

NASHvILLE, TENNESSEE 372it3-0,1,12

OFFICE: (515) 532-1550

September 15,2015

Mr. Dale Wilkerson Shiloh National Military Park I 055 Pittsburg t anding Rod Shiloh, Tennessee, 3 8376

RE: NPS, IIAMBURG-PUR-DY ROAD/REHAB, SHILOH, ltARDlN COUNTY

Dear Mr. Wilkerson:

In response to your request, received on Thursday, September 3, 2015, we hav€ reviewed the documents you submitted regarding your proposed underAking. Our review of and comment on your proposed undertaking are among the requir€ments of Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This Act requires federal agencies or applicant for federal assistance to consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Of6ce before they carry out their proposed undertakings. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has codified procedures for carrying out Section 106 review in 36 CFR 800. You may wish to familiarize yourself with tlese procedures (Federal Register, December 12, 2000, pages 77698-77739) if you are unsure about the Section 106 process. You may find additional information conceming the Section 106 process and the Tennessee STIPO'S documentation requirements at http://www.tenness€e.gov/environment/hisVfederaVsect I 06.shtml

Considering available information, we find that the project as curently proposed will NOT ADVERSELY

AFFECT ANY PROPERTY THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF

HISTORIC PLACES. Therefore, this office has no objcction to the implementation ofthis project. Please direct questions and comments to Joe canison (615) 770-t092.

We appreciate your cooperation.

Sincerely, {P*/'kfl,ln,l E. Patrick Mclntyre, Jr.

Executive Dkector and State Historic Preservation Ofiicer

EPM/jyg

TENNESSEE HISTORICAL COMMISSION

2941 LEBANON ROAD

NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37 243.0442

OFFICE: (615) 532-1550

September 15,2015

Mr. Dale Wilkerson Shiloh National Military Park 1055 Pittsburg Landing Rod Shiloh, Termessee, 383?6

RE: NPS, CORINTH.PITTSBURG LANDING ROAD, SHILOH, HARDIN COLTNTY

Dear Mr. Wilkerson:

ln response to your requ€st, received on Thursday, September 3, 2015, we have reviewed tho documents you submitted regarding your proposed undertaking. Our review of and comm€nt on your proposed undertaking are among the requirements of Section 106 ofthe National Hisoric Preservation Act. This Act requires federal agencies or applicant for federal assistance to consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation OfEce before they carry out their proposed undertakings. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has codified procedures for carrying out Section 106 review in 36 CFR 800. You may wish to familiarize younelf with these procedures (Federal Register, December 12, 2000, pages 77698-77739) it you are unsure about the Section 106 process. You may fnd additional information conceming the Section 106 process and the Tennessee SHPO's documentation requirements at http://www.tennessee. gov/environment/hisVfederaVsect I 06.shtrnl

Considering available information, we find that the project as currently proposed will NOT ADVERSELY

AFFECT ANY PROPERTY THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF

HISTORIC PLACES. Therefore, this office has no objection to the implementation ofthis project. Please direct questions and comments to Joe canison (615) 770-1092.

We appreciate your cooperation.

Sincerely, .--2,/) r-' t r /) t1- a-.,ftJ'/L'4+L\.

E. Patrick Mclnrlre. Jr. A 'C/ t Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Offi cer

EPiWjyg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .