Report_1_NEPA.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Shiloh National Military Park
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-16-B-00027
About this file
Report 1_NEPA
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ROBO_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf | ||
| FP14_Eng.pdf | ||
| Report_3_Pavement_Condition_Survey.pdf | ||
| VETS-4212_-_Form.pdf | ||
| Plans_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf | ||
| IFB_Solicitation_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).pdf | ||
| Report_2_SWPPP.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc | DOC document | |
| Synopsis_-_NP-SHIL_11(1) _18(1).doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
On the basis of the environmental impact infonnation in the statutory compliance file, with rvhich I arn familiar. I bclieve tlie proiect should be categorically excluded fiom further NEPA analysis.
Prepared by:
f-zz - !{ Date
Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Hi ghway Adrninistration Eastem Federal Lands Highway Division
On the basis of the environmental impact information in the statutory compliance file, with which l arn familiar, I arr categorically excluding the described project from frrther NEPA analysis. No exceptional circumstances (i.e., all boxes in the ESF are marked "no") or conditions apply and the action is fully described in 23 CFR 771.117 Categorical Exclusions.
..i n
I
Date Envifonrnental Compliance Specialist Fedelral Hi ghway Adrninistration Eastem Federal Lands Highway Division i Il t I
7/)2/rJ- Dale Wilkerson Superintendent Shiloh National Military Park
TENNESSEE HISTORICAL COMMISSION
2941 LEBANON ROAD
NASHvILLE, TENNESSEE 372it3-0,1,12
OFFICE: (515) 532-1550
September 15,2015
Mr. Dale Wilkerson Shiloh National Military Park I 055 Pittsburg t anding Rod Shiloh, Tennessee, 3 8376
RE: NPS, IIAMBURG-PUR-DY ROAD/REHAB, SHILOH, ltARDlN COUNTY
Dear Mr. Wilkerson:
In response to your request, received on Thursday, September 3, 2015, we hav€ reviewed the documents you submitted regarding your proposed underAking. Our review of and comment on your proposed undertaking are among the requir€ments of Section 106 ofthe National Historic Preservation Act. This Act requires federal agencies or applicant for federal assistance to consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation Of6ce before they carry out their proposed undertakings. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has codified procedures for carrying out Section 106 review in 36 CFR 800. You may wish to familiarize yourself with tlese procedures (Federal Register, December 12, 2000, pages 77698-77739) if you are unsure about the Section 106 process. You may find additional information conceming the Section 106 process and the Tennessee STIPO'S documentation requirements at http://www.tenness€e.gov/environment/hisVfederaVsect I 06.shtml
Considering available information, we find that the project as curently proposed will NOT ADVERSELY
AFFECT ANY PROPERTY THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES. Therefore, this office has no objcction to the implementation ofthis project. Please direct questions and comments to Joe canison (615) 770-t092.
We appreciate your cooperation.
Sincerely, {P*/'kfl,ln,l E. Patrick Mclntyre, Jr.
Executive Dkector and State Historic Preservation Ofiicer
EPM/jyg
TENNESSEE HISTORICAL COMMISSION
2941 LEBANON ROAD
NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE 37 243.0442
OFFICE: (615) 532-1550
September 15,2015
Mr. Dale Wilkerson Shiloh National Military Park 1055 Pittsburg Landing Rod Shiloh, Termessee, 383?6
RE: NPS, CORINTH.PITTSBURG LANDING ROAD, SHILOH, HARDIN COLTNTY
Dear Mr. Wilkerson:
ln response to your requ€st, received on Thursday, September 3, 2015, we have reviewed tho documents you submitted regarding your proposed undertaking. Our review of and comm€nt on your proposed undertaking are among the requirements of Section 106 ofthe National Hisoric Preservation Act. This Act requires federal agencies or applicant for federal assistance to consult with the appropriate State Historic Preservation OfEce before they carry out their proposed undertakings. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation has codified procedures for carrying out Section 106 review in 36 CFR 800. You may wish to familiarize younelf with these procedures (Federal Register, December 12, 2000, pages 77698-77739) it you are unsure about the Section 106 process. You may fnd additional information conceming the Section 106 process and the Tennessee SHPO's documentation requirements at http://www.tennessee. gov/environment/hisVfederaVsect I 06.shtrnl
Considering available information, we find that the project as currently proposed will NOT ADVERSELY
AFFECT ANY PROPERTY THAT IS ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF
HISTORIC PLACES. Therefore, this office has no objection to the implementation ofthis project. Please direct questions and comments to Joe canison (615) 770-1092.
We appreciate your cooperation.
Sincerely, .--2,/) r-' t r /) t1- a-.,ftJ'/L'4+L\.
E. Patrick Mclnrlre. Jr. A 'C/ t Executive Director and State Historic Preservation Offi cer
EPiWjyg
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .