Report_1_Bridge_Inspection_Report_2011.pdf

PDF 4 MB Posted

Attached to
National Mall and Memorial Parks - Kutz Bridge, PRA-NAMA 502(5)
Solicitation number
DTFH71-14-B-00008
Issued by

About this file

Report 1_Bridge Inspection Report 2011

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
FP03_Eng_.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation_PRA-NAMA_502(5).pdf PDF
Report_2_Bridge_Inspection_Report_2013.pdf PDF
VETS-100A_Form.pdf PDF
Report_4_NEPA.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Subcontracting_plan.doc DOC document
Plans_PRA-NAMA_502(5).pdf PDF
Report_3_Cert_Program_for_Bridge_Temp_Works_(FHWA-RD-93-033).pdf PDF
FP03_Errata.pdf PDF
Synopsis_Notice_PRA-NAMA_502(5).doc DOC document
Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

KUTZ BRIDGE

INDEPENDENCE AVENUE OVER TIDAL BASIN

NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS

LE

STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 3/8/11

Report prepared by: SS

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

N

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

KUTZ BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 3/8/11

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... STEEL CONTINUOUS NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... NO. OF APPR. SPANS: ........ STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 7 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: ..

DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH:

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES CURB TO CURB WIDTH:

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES / UNKNOW YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE / MASONRY YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... DAWR4B / NONE SKEW ANGLE:

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL:

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE.

LOCATION

623.3 FT (190.0 M)

41.6 FT (12.7 M)

47.0 FT (14.3 M)

34.0 FT (10.4 M)

0 °

NO

NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS MILE POINT: ..................... 0.49 (KM PT 0.79)

STATE: ................................. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOCATION: North end of Tidal Basin.

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ INDEPENDENCE AVENUE

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. TIDAL BASIN

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This continuous steel multi-beam bridge is in fair condition overall, and is in need of rehabilitation and safety improvements. The main problems include cracking, rust staining, and spalling with exposed rebar throughout the deck underside; minor to moderate deterioration of the asphalt wearing surface; and deterioration of the pier ornamental masonry blocks and mortar joints. Additionally, the compression seal deck expansion joints are in poor condition, allowing water and roadway salts to infiltrate to the superstructure and substructure, exacerbating the deterioration. These compression seals should be replaced in the near term.

The traffic railings have been repainted recently; however, rusting is beginning with areas of rust perforations throughout. Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. This structure is schedules for rehabilitation in the near future under project NACC 502(5).

It should be noted that the seawalls adjacent to this structure and around the Tidal Basin continue to deteriorate, exhibiting extensive mortar loss throughout the masonry mortar joints and numerous missing and displaced stones.

Additionally the areas of erosion between the east wingwalls and adjacent seawalls have increased. Further deterioration of these walls will likely lead to a loss of fill into the Tidal Basin and may have a significant impact on the adjacent pedestrian walkways and hand railings throughout the site. Consideration should be given to a project to rehabilitate the seawalls.

INSPECTION TEAM: D.K JOHNSON, E.A. JARRELL (CLARK NEXSEN)

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

D. KEITH JOHNSON, FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW:

GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 6/28/11

GEORGE CHOUBAH, P.E., INSPECTION PROGRAM TEAM LEADER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

C226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6 SECURE RAILING TO CONCRETE POST ATTACHMENT COUPLERS THROUGH

RAILING SYSTEM.

80 HR

58.8 REPLACE/TIGHTEN SCREWS AT UTILITY ACCESS PANELS IN SIDEWALKS.

SECURE AND COVER ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR LIGHTING ON OVERHANGS.

60 HR

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

59.1,2,6,7 CLEAN AND PAINT STRUCTURAL STEEL BEAMS AND BEARINGS. 50,000 SF $0

58.3 REMOVE WEARING SURFACE, AND REPLACE WITH WEARING

SURFACE CAPABLE OF RESISTING WATER INFILTRATION.

26,300 SF $0

58.1, 60.4,15

REPAIR SPALLED AND DELAMINATED CONCRETE THROUGHOUT

STRUCTURE. CLEAN EXPOSED REBAR AND COAT WITH

APPROVED SEALANT.

1,000 SF $0

58.2 REPLACE COMPRESSION SEAL EXPANSION JOINTS AND

ARMORING.

200 LF $0

60.13 REPOINT MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS AND REPAIR ORNAMENTAL

CONCRETE ON PIERS.

600 LF $0

60.9 REPAIR EROSION BETWEEN SEAWALL AND NORTHEAST AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALLS.

20 CY $0

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $0

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that the recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

This structure is schedules for rehabilitation in the near future under project NACC 502(5).

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.

FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLE

EXCELLENT CONDITION

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.

FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.

N

58. DECK

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

OTHER

ALIGNMENT

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

FASCIA(E)

DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

TRUSSES

FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

GIRDERS OR BEAMS

BEARING DEVICES

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

OTHER

DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

UTILITIES

DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

RIDEABILITY

WEARING SURFACE

EXPANSION JOINTS

DECK SLAB

ABUTMENTS

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

1.

10.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

9.

8.

7.

6.

5.

4.

3.

2.

1.

PAINT

11.

F F N N N G F N G

N G

F F G F G F

N

P

G

F

58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

RUST STAINING, SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR (UP TO 1/16"

LOSS OF SECTION), AND DELAMINATION THROUGHOUT DECK

UNDERSIDE; MINOR HONEYCOMBING IN ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

OVERHANGS GENERALLY IN GOOD CONDITION; MINOR TO

MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON UNDERSIDE OF SOUTH OVERHANG, SPAN #10.

MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF SOUTH EDGE OF DECK

AT RAIL POSTS ABOVE PIER #13 AND PIER #14.

58.2 SEVERE DAMAGE TO EXPANSION JOINT SEALS AND ARMORING

THROUGHOUT, LIKELY DUE TO SNOWPLOW IMPACT.

COMPRESSION SEAL EXPANSION JOINTS OVER BOTH ABUTMENTS

AND PIERS #3, #9, AND #12 SHREDDED AND PACKED WITH DEBRIS

FOR FULL LENGTH; COMPRESSION SEAL MISSING FOR FULL

LENGTH OVER PIER #6. 3' OF BROKEN GUARD ANGLE AT JOINT

OVER PIER #3, 4' AT JOINT OVER PIER #6, AND 1' AT JOINT OVER

PIER #12.

MINOR ADHESION FAILURE OF POURABLE SEAL EXPANSION JOINT

AT END OF EAST APPROACH SPANS.

58.3,4 MINOR TO MODERATE MAP, TRANSVERSE, AND LONGITUDINAL

CRACKING OF ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE THROUGHOUT;

MODERATE WEARING SURFACE DISTRESS IN SPANS #4 THROUGH

#6 AND #9. MINOR TO MODERATE POTHOLES THROUGHOUT.

ASPHALT PATCHES AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS, AFFECTING

APPROXIMATELY 1% OF WEARING SURFACE AREA; MINOR TO

MODERATE SETTLEMENT OF ASPHALT PATCHES. MODERATE

LONGITUDINAL CRACKING, POTHOLES, AND UNEVEN PAVEMENT

ALONG LANE LINES, FOR FULL LENGTH OF STRUCTURE.

MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF WEARING SURFACE

ALONG EXPANSION JOINTS.

58.5 MINOR TRANSVERSE CRACKING OF SIDEWALKS THROUGHOUT;

MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING OF NORTH SIDEWALK AT

ISOLATED LOCATIONS. SIDEWALK CONCRETE HAS BEEN PATCHED

AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS IN THE PAST.

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. F

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. G

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. F

FOUNDATIONS5. G

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. P

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

F13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS

N14. PILE BENTS

G15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

F16. FOUNDATIONS

F17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

G18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

N19. OTHER

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 7

G G G G N

LOW

SUFF

13 FT.

222. APPROACHES 6

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N F G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL 6

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL F

N N G G N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

N - Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

58.6 MINOR RUSTING OF TRAFFIC RAILINGS AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.

MINOR COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST END OF NORTH TRAFFIC

RAILING. MINOR TO MODERATE RUST PERFORATIONS

THROUGHOUT BOTTOM OF TRAFFIC RAILING SECTION ENDS,

PRIMARILY AT DECK JOINT LOCATIONS. MINOR SCRAPES WITH

SURFACE RUST ON SIDEWALK FACE OF SOUTH TRAFFIC RAILING

OVER EAST ABUTMENT.

MINOR SCALING OF CONCRETE RAIL POSTS. SEVERAL RAILING TO

CONCRETE POST ATTACHMENT COUPLERS PARTIALLY

UNSCREWED THROUGHOUT RAILING SYSTEM, ONE COMPLETELY

UNSCREWED IN SPAN #3 OVER PIER #3 ON NORTH SIDE. MINOR

DETERIORATION OF GROUT ON MASONRY END PARAPETS. MINOR

SPALLING OF SOUTH CONCRETE PARAPET CAP AT EAST

APPROACH. ORNAMENTAL MASONRY CAP AT SOUTHEAST END

PARAPET AJAR.

58.8 PREVIOUSLY NOTED NON-FUNCTIONING LIGHTS NOT OBSERVED

DUE TO DAYTIME CONDITIONS. PREVIOUSLY NOTED DISPLACED

CAP FOR LUMINAIRE ON NORTH SIDE OVER WEST ABUTMENT HAS

BEEN REPAIRED. PREVIOUSLY NOTED LEANING LIGHT STANDARD

ON NORTH SIDE OVER PIER #9 HAS BEEN STRAIGHTENED.

EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR LIGHTING ON UNDERSIDE OF

OVERHANGS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS AND SEVERAL PIERS.

NUMEROUS SCREWS MISSING AND LOOSE AT UTILITY ACCESS

PANELS IN SIDEWALKS.

59.1,2,6,7 MODERATE PEELING OF PAINT ON STRUCTURAL STEEL

THROUGHOUT; MINOR SURFACE RUST ON EXPOSED STEEL;

SECTION LOSS NEGLIGIBLE. MODERATE RUSTING WITH RUST

SCALE WITH NO LOSS OF SECTION ON BOTTOM FLANGES AND

BOTTOM 6" OF WEBS AT BEAM ENDS BELOW DECK JOINT

LOCATIONS. MODERATE RUSTING WITH RUST SCALE ON TOP AND

BOTTOM FLANGES, FULL HEIGHT OF WEB AND ALONG BOTTOM

FLANGE COVER PLATES, BEAM #5 OVER PIER #4 FOR 10' LONG.

MINOR SURFACE RUST THROUGHOUT BEARINGS.

HAIRLINE VERTICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE-ENCASED STEEL

BEAMS SPACED AT APPROXIMATELY 18" THROUGHOUT; RANDOM

HAIRLINE DIAGONAL CRACKING AT SUPPORTS. MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH EXTERIOR BEAMS AT JOINTS OVER

PIERS. MINOR DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #1 IN

SPAN #4 AT PIER #3. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #1 IN SPAN #7 AT PIER #6. MINOR

DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #1 IN SPAN #10 AT PIER

#9.

UNABLE TO ACCESS CONCRETE TEE-BEAMS INSIDE ENCLOSED

ABUTMENT SPANS.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

60.1 MINOR SPALLING AND MODERATE SCALING OF ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS; MODERATE SPALLING OF EAST

BREASTWALL AT NORTH END. MINOR DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS.

TWO LOOSE FASCIA PANELS AT NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST ABUTMENT WITH HEAVILY DETERIORATED GROUT NOTED IN UNDERWATER INSPECTION PERFORMED ON 10/15/08. HEAVY DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE

FASCIA PANELS AT NORTH END OF EAST ABUTMENT BELOW HIGH WATER MARK.

60.3,15 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON BEARING SEATS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS AND ALL PIERS.

MINOR SPALLING WITH EXPOSED AND RUSTED REBAR AT PIER #12. MINOR SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON

SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #6 BEARING SEAT, PIER #12 IN SPAN #13.

60.4 GAP (1 1/4") BETWEEN BACKWALL AND APPROACH SLAB POURDOWN AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. MINOR CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND WIDESPREAD MODERATE DELAMINATION AND SPALLING WITH SOME EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST ABUTMENT BACKWALL. MINOR HORIZONTAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND

DELAMINATION OF EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL, BAYS #1, #5, AND #6.

60.5,9 EXPOSED TIMBER PILES BELOW CONCRETE FOOTINGS AT ENDS OF BOTH ABUTMENTS AND ALONG ALL WINGWALLS, AS NOTED IN UNDERWATER INSPECTION PERFORMED ON 10/15/08. EXPOSURE UP TO 12", FOR UP TO 12' LENGTH ALONG FACE OF ABUTMENT AND 8' TO 30' ALONG WINGWALLS. EXPOSED PILES IN FAIR

CONDITION WITH TYPICAL AWL PENETRATIONS OF 1/2".

SEVERE EROSION BETWEEN SEAWALL AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL, 20'L X 10'W X 6'D (PREVIOUSLY 6'L X 8'W X 4'D) WITH WINGWALL FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 3 1/2'H. MODERATE EROSION BETWEEN SEAWALL AND

SOUTHEAST WINGWALL, 10'L X 4'W X 3'D (NEW SINCE LAST INSPECTION).

60.13 MODERATE TO SEVERE SPALLING OF ORNAMENTAL CONCRETE ON SEVERAL PIERS. MODERATE

DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH SEVERAL CRACKED AND LOOSE STONES.

GAP BETWEEN SIDEWALKS AND SIDE OF PIERS AND ABUTMENTS AT EXPANSION JOINTS MEASURES BETWEEN

1/2" AND 2 1/2"; OFFSET POSSIBLY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION.

MODERATE TO SEVERE DETERIORATION OF CONCRETE FASCIA PANELS BELOW HIGH WATER MARK, ALL PIERS, AS NOTED IN UNDERWATER INSPECTION PERFORMED ON 10/15/08; DETERIORATION MAINLY AT NORTH END OF

PIERS.

ADDITIONAL FINDINGS FROM UNDERWATER INSPECTION: OUTER 1/2" OF PILES SOFT AT SOUTH END OF PIER #2. MINOR SPALL AT NORTHWEST CORNER OF PIER #3 FOOTING; NO REBAR EXPOSED. POOR CONCRETE CONSOLIDATION ALONG BOTTOM OF PIER #6 FOOTING WITH EXPOSED AGGREGATE AND UP TO 2" PENETRATION. LOOSE FASCIA PANEL AT NORTH END OF PIER #12 WITH BROKEN ANCHOR ROD. TIMBER

FORMWORK REMAINS AT SOUTH END OF PIER #14 FOOTING.

60.15 PONDING WATER ON TOP OF PIER #3.

60.16,17 EXPOSED TIMBER PILES BELOW CONCRETE FOOTINGS AT ALL PIERS NOTED IN UNDERWATER INSPECTION PERFORMED ON 10/15/08; EXPOSURE RANGES FROM 1.5' TO 3'. EXPOSED PILES IN FAIR CONDITION WITH

TYPICAL AWL PENETRATIONS OF 1/2".

61.3 RIPRAP PRESENT AT ABUTMENTS, WINGWALLS, AND MOST PIERS, AS NOTED IN UNDERWATER INSPECTION

PERFORMED ON 10/15/08.

ADDITIONAL ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

61.4 CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS REMAINS IN CHANNEL AT MANY SUBSTRUCTURE UNITS AS NOTED IN UNDERWATER

INSPECTION PERFORMED ON 10/15/08.

222.4 MODERATE CRACKING AND SPALLING OF EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT.

223.1 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF SEAWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS WITH MINOR EFFLORESCENCE.

SEVERAL CAPSTONES LOOSE AND SEVERAL SEAWALL STONES MISSING.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3S2 29 26 48 44

TYPE 3-3 35 32 58 53

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND

CONDITION.

A

A

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS (1) STATE: ....................................... 113 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... KUTZ BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 001 - DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 3400-032P (4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 2 - NATIONAL CAPITAL (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 502 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... TIDAL BASIN

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 032P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. INDEPENDENCE AVENUE

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 3400032P0000000

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ North end of Tidal Basin.

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ DAWR4B (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 0.49 (KM PT 0.79)

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

4 - STEEL CONTINUOUS

02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER

41.6 FT (12.7 M)

623.3 FT (190.0 M)

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

3 - SPREAD FOOTING ON PILES

0 - UNKNOWN

1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 2 - CONCRETE CONTINUOUS

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 04 - TEE BEAM

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 6

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... R - POSTED (OTHER)

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.0 TONS (18.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 4 - POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 33.0 TONS (29.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 3/11 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. YES

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: 60 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 10/08

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 38°53'12.00"

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 77°02'21.60"

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 0 MI (0 KM)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 5 - HIGHWAY-PEDESTRIAN

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC:

(30) YEAR OF ADT:

(114) FUTURE ADT:

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT:

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

(32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °

(35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 34.0 FT (10.4 M)

(50) SIDEWALKS:

LEFT : ...................................... 5.3 FT (1.6 M)

RIGHT : ................................... 5.3 FT (1.6 M)

(214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE

MATERIAL: .............................. 3 - CONCRETE/STEEL

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 3 - SIMPLE RAIL (joints at each

(215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.50 FT (0.76 M)

(53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL:

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

T - Tidal. Low risk. Not yet evalu

2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

C - MODERATE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

1982-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

ENCLOSED APPROACH SPANS AT BOTH ENDS OF STRUCTURE; UNABLE TO ACCESS IN 2011 DUE TO MANHOLES SEALED SHUT.

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:77�02'21.60 http:38�53'12.00

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 3400-032P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD WEST BASIN DRIVE

PHOTO #2 - NORTH SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST

PHOTO #4 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF WEARING SURFACE; SPAN #11

SHOWN

PHOTO #5 - WEARING SURFACE DISTRESS IN SPAN #5; ALSO NOTE

TYPICAL CRACKING AND ASPHALT PATCHING

PHOTO #6 - WEARING SURFACE DISTRESS IN SPAN #9

PHOTO #7 - DAMAGED GUARD ANGLE AT PIER

#3 EXPANSION JOINT; ALSO NOTE

COMPRESSION SEAL SHREDDED AND

PACKED WITH DEBRIS

PHOTO #8 - DETERIORATION AND DAMAGE TO

DECK EXPANSION JOINT OVER PIER #12

PHOTO #9 - DAMAGED GUARD ANGLE AT

EXPANSION JOINT OVER PIER #6; ALSO NOTE

MISSING COMPRESSION SEAL

PHOTO #10 - CLOSE UP VIEW OF PREVIOUS

PHOTO

PHOTO #11 - CRACKING AND SPALLING OF

EAST APPROACH PAVEMENT

PHOTO #12 - COLLISION DAMAGE AT WEST

END OF NORTH TRAFFIC RAILING

PHOTO #13 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF TRAFFIC RAILINGS; NORTH

RAILING AT EAST ABUTMENT SHOWN; ALSO NOTE TYPICAL RUST

PERFORATIONS AT TRAFFIC RAILING SECTION ENDS

PHOTO #14 - TYPICAL RUST PERFORATIONS THROUGHOUT BOTTOM

OF TRAFFIC RAILING SECTION ENDS; SOUTH RAILING AT EAST

APPROACH SHOWN

PHOTO #15 - UNSCREWED RAILING TO

CONCRETE POST ATTACHMENT COUPLER IN

SPAN #3 OVER PIER #3

PHOTO #16 - GAP BETWEEN SIDEWALK AND

SOUTH SIDE OF PIER #3

PHOTO #17 - TYPICAL LOOSE AND MISSING SCREWS FOR UTILITY

ACCESS PANELS IN SIDEWALKS; SOUTH SIDE IN SPAN #12 SHOWN

PHOTO #18 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING WEST, SPAN #14

PHOTO #19 - TYPICAL CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND RUST

STAINING ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY #2, SPAN #11 SHOWN; ALSO

NOTE TYPICAL SCALING OF DECK UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #20 - TYPICAL DELAMINATION OF DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY #4 OF

SPAN #13 SHOWN

PHOTO #21 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH

EXPOSED REBAR ON DECK UNDERSIDE; BAY

#5 OF SPAN #13 NEAR PIER #13 SHOWN

PHOTO #22 - DELAMINATION AND SPALLING

WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF

SOUTH OVERHANG, SPAN #10

PHOTO #23 - TYPICAL EXPOSED ELECTRICAL WIRING FOR LIGHTING

ON UNDERSIDE OF OVERHANGS; SOUTH OVERHANG AT PIER #3

SHOWN

PHOTO #24 - RUSTING WITH RUST SCALE ON BEAM #5 OVER PIER #4

PHOTO #25 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH RUST SCALE ON BOTTOM

FLANGES AND BOTTOM 6" OF WEBS AT BEAM ENDS BELOW DECK

JOINT LOCATIONS; BEAM #5 IN SPAN #6 AT PIER #6 SHOWN

PHOTO #26 - TYPICAL RUSTING WITH RUST SCALE ON BOTTOM

FLANGES AND BOTTOM 6" OF WEBS AT BEAM ENDS BELOW DECK

JOINT LOCATIONS; BEAM #2 IN SPAN #13 AT PIER #12 SHOWN

PHOTO #27 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING

OF CONCRETE-ENCASED STEEL BEAMS;

BEAM #1 AT MIDSPAN OF SPAN #14 SHOWN

PHOTO #28 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #1 IN SPAN #7 AT

PIER #6

PHOTO #29 - DELAMINATION OF SOUTH FACE

OF BEAM #1 IN SPAN #10 AT PIER #9

PHOTO #30 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST

ABUTMENT

PHOTO #31 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF ABUTMENT MASONRY

MORTAR; NORTH END OF WEST ABUTMENT SHOWN; ALSO NOTE

TYPICAL SPALLING OF MASONRY STONES

PHOTO #32 - SPALLING OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL AT NORTH

END

PHOTO #33 - TYPICAL SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON WEST

ABUTMENT BACKWALL; BAY #4 SHOWN

PHOTO #34 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE AND DELAMINATION

OF EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL, BAY #1

PHOTO #35 - TYPICAL VERTICAL CRACKING OF ABUTMENT BEARING

SEATS; EAST ABUTMENT, BAY #5 SHOWN

PHOTO #36 - GENERAL VIEW OF PIER #14, EAST SIDE

PHOTO #37 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

MASONRY ON PIERS; EAST SIDE OF PIER #12

SHOWN

PHOTO #38 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS ON PIERS; NORTH

END OF PIER #12 SHOWN

PHOTO #39 - SPALL WITH EXPOSED REBAR

ON SOUTH FACE OF BEAM #6 BEARING SEAT,

PIER #12 IN SPAN #13

PHOTO #40 - EROSION BETWEEN SEAWALL

AND NORTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #41 - EROSION BETWEEN SEAWALL

AND SOUTHEAST WINGWALL

PHOTO #42 - TYPICAL DETERIORATION OF

SEAWALL MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS;

SOUTHWEST SEAWALL SHOWN; ALSO NOTE

MISSING STONES

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .