Bridge Inspection Report.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- DTFH71-09-B-00013
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| IFB Solicitation.pdf | ||
| FP03 Errata.pdf | ||
| FP03_Met.pdf | ||
| REV__SB subcontract plan revised.doc | DOC document | |
| Geotechnical Report.pdf | ||
| Plans.pdf | ||
| ARRA Sign Pictographs.pdf | ||
| ADV_Bidder's Qualifications Form.doc | DOC document | |
| FBO Ready - Synopsis.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
TOMS CREEK BRIDGE
U.S. ROUTE 209 OVER TOMS CREEK
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 10/23/07
Federal Highway Administration
Report prepared by: ED
MILE POINT:
KILOMETER POINT:
4.90 7.89
Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
TOMS CREEK BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 10/23/07
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... TEE BEAM NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 8 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 32.3 FT (9.8 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... BITUMINOUS DECK WIDTH: ...................... 34.9 FT (10.6 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... PRA-DEWA 14 / SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 30 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1987-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. 2007-LOAD TEST, CRACK MONITOR INSTALLED.
LOCATION
DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: ..................... 4.90 (KM PT 7.89)
STATE: ................................. PENNSYLVANIA LOCATION: 4.9 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH PARK
ENTRANCE. FACILITY CARRIED: ............ U.S. ROUTE 209
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. TOMS CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This bridge is in very poor condition due to widespread severe deterioration of the structural concrete, as well as erosion and undermining at the approaches, and scour at the abutments. This bridge is scheduled for replacement in the near future under Project No. PRA-DEWA 14(10). The condition of the bridge will continue to be monitored until it is replaced.
INSPECTION TEAM: G. GOODLIN, N. JANSEN
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., LEAD STRUCTURAL ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 3/10/08
JOHN R. THIEL, P.E., BRIDGE MANAGEMENT ENGINEER 703-404-6251
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT B
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT
COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
58, 59, 60 REPLACE STRUCTURE (SEE REMARKS BELOW). 1 LS $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : $1,000,000 $0
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL:
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS: ..................... $1,000,000
$0 $1,000,000
$0 PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
$2,000,000
REMARKS: This structure is scheduled for replacement in the near future under Project No. PRA-DEWA 14(10).
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
INSPECTION DATE: 10/23/07
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 4
ABUTMENTS
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
P1. DECK SLAB
N2. EXPANSION JOINTS
P3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
F7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 3
F1. BEARING DEVICES
P2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
N3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
F6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
N8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 6
58.1 MODERATE TRANSVERSE AND LONGITUDINAL CRACKING AND
SEVERAL SPALLS WITH RUST STAINS, EFFLORESCENCE, AND
EXPOSED REBAR ON UNDERSIDE OF DECK.
58.3,4 NEW ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE AND IN
BOTH APPROACHES.
58.6 MINOR DETERIORATION OF EXPANSION JOINT FILLER IN
PARAPETS; MODERATE AT NORTHEAST ENDWALL. NORTHWEST
PARAPET ENDWALL HAS ROTATED OUTWARD APPROXIMATELY 1.5"
DUE TO SETTLEMENT. SOUTHEAST PARAPET ENDWALL IS
ROTATED AND UNDERMINED.
58.7 MINOR TO MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AND MINOR DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION IN CURBLINES.
59.1 MODERATE RUSTING OF BEARINGS.
59.2,6 SEVERE CRACKING (UP TO 1/16" WIDE) AND MINOR SPALLING
THROUGHOUT BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS WITH SEVERE
EFFLORESCENCE. SEVERE SPALLING WITH EXPOSED REBAR ON
ENDS OF DOWNSTREAM FASCIA BEAM BY DECK DRAINS. SEVERE
SPALL AT NORTH END OF UPSTREAM FASCIA BEAM.
60.1 UP TO 1/8" WIDE VERTICAL CRACKING THROUGHOUT ABUTMENT
BREASTWALLS. MODERATE EFFLORESCENCE FROM BEARING
SEATS.
60.6 SEVERE CRACKING (UP TO 1" WIDE) AND EFFLORESCENCE ON
SOUTHEAST WINGWALL. MODERATE CRACKING OF OTHER
WINGWALLS WITH EFFLORESCENCE.
60.9 STREAM FLOWS AGAINST SOUTHWEST WINGWALL, THEN
CROSSES TO FLOW ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT. TOP OF
STONE-PAVED APRON HAS BEEN EXPOSED AT DOWNSTREAM
CORNER OF NORTH ABUTMENT AND UPSTREAM CORNER OF
SOUTH ABUTMENT.
1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F
2. PILE BENTS N
3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS G
4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS G
5. FOUNDATIONS G
6. WINGWALLS F
7. WEEP HOLES G
8. EXPANSION JOINTS N
9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR F
10. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G
11. SLOPE PROTECTION N
12. OTHER N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N
FOUNDATIONS16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N
OTHER 19. N
INSPECTION DATE: 10/23/07
STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010PFIELD INSPECTION REPORT
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
7. NORMAL VELOCITY
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
5. OTHER
4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F F G G N
MED
SUFF
9 FT.
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
ROCK
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. F
N N G F G G G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
61.1,2 SEE 60.9.
222.1,5 UNDERMINING OF SOUTH APPROACH SLAB AT EAST SHOULDER
HAS BEEN PATCHED. SLAB HAS MODERATE CRACKING.
222.4 NEW ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT BOTH APPROACHES.
222.7 TYPE 3 OBJECT MARKERS AT ALL 4 CORNERS OF STRUCTURE;
SOME OBSCURING BY VEGETATION GROWTH.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 20 19
HS 23 21 31 28
TYPE 3 20 18 27 25
TYPE 3S2 30 27 40 37
TYPE 3-3 39 36 53 48
DESIGN LOADING: OTHER OR UNKNOWN (H20 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
X CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING IS UNKNOWN; ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND CONDITION. LOAD CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED DUE TO POOR CONDITION OF SUPERSTRUCTURE.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: DELAWARE WATER GAP NATIONAL RECREATION AREA
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... TOMS CREEK BRIDGE
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 4320-010P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 3 - NORTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 14
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 010P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. PARK
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ PRA-DEWA 14
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
423 - PENNSYLVANIA (PA)
103 - PIKE
161000140
TOMS CREEK
U.S. ROUTE 209
4320010P0000000
4.9 MILES NORTH OF SOUTH
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
4.90 (KM PT 7.89)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
04 - TEE BEAM
32.3 FT (9.8 M)
32.3 FT (9.8 M)
0 - UNKNOWN
0 - UNKNOWN
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
1 - CONCRETE CAST-IN-PLACE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 6 - BITUMINOUS
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - OTHER OR UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... B - OPEN, POSTING REC.
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 23.0 TONS (20.8 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 3 - POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 31.0 TONS (28.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 10/07 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: Y - 1 - DECK SURVEY (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 41°07'27.40" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 74°57'15.70" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 34.9 FT (10.6 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 2 MI (3 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 35.0 FT (10.7 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 23.0 FT (7.0 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 4470 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 30 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2003 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 4917 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 32.3 FT (9.8 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2023 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 1 - CONCRETE
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 2 - CONTINUOUS, NEW JERSE
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.60 FT (0.79 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(224) EST. REMAINING LIFE: .... 4 YEARS
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
4 - Stable. Action required to pro
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
B - MAJOR
$0
$1,000,000
$0
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1987-BRIDGE RAIL REPAIR/REPLACEMENT. 2007-LOAD TEST, CRACK MONITOR INSTALLED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 4320-010P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING NORTH TOWARD DINGMANS FERRY
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - EAST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL VIEW OF TOP SIDE OF STRUCTURE LOOKING
NORTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL VIEW OF UNDERSIDE OF STRUCTURE LOOKING
NORTH
PHOTO #5 - LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
RUST STAINS, AND EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF DECK; BAY BETWEEN BEAM #2
AND #3 SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - TRANSVERSE CRACKING WITH
RUST STAINS, AND EFFLORESCENCE ON
UNDERSIDE OF DECK
PHOTO #7 - NEW ASPHALT WEARING SURFACE OVER STRUCTURE
PHOTO #8 - TYPICAL RUSTING OF BEARINGS; BEAM #7 AT SOUTH
ABUTMENT SHOWN
PHOTO #9 - TYPICAL CRACKING AND SPALLING THROUGHOUT BEAMS
WITH EFFLORESCENCE; BEAMS #1, #2, #3 AND #4 SHOWN
PHOTO #10 - TYPICAL CRACKING OF CONCRETE BEAM WITH SEVERE
EFFLORESCENCE; EAST FACE OF BEAM #3 SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - UP TO 1/16" WIDE CRACKING OF BEAM #7, EAST FACE
PHOTO #12 - CRACK GAGE INSTALLED ON EAST FACE OF BEAM #5; NO
MOVEMENT NOTED
PHOTO #13 - SPALLING WITH EXPOSED
REBAR ON NORTH END OF DOWNSTREAM
FASCIA BEAM NEAR DECK DRAIN
PHOTO #14 - VERTICAL CRACK IN SOUTH
ABUTMENT BREASTWALLS UNDER BEAM #3;
ALSO NOTE EFFLORESCENCE FROM BEARING
SEATS
PHOTO #15 - LOOKING UPSTREAM; NOTE STREAM FLOWS AGAINST
SOUTHWEST WINGWALL
PHOTO #16 - EXPOSED TOP OF STONE-PAVED APRON AT
DOWNSTREAM CORNER OF NORTH ABUTMENT
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .