Q&A_DTFH6817B00034_2.5.2018.pdf

PDF 41 KB Posted

Attached to
HI FTNP HALE 10(2) Haleakala National Park Rehabilitation
Solicitation number
DTFH6817B00034
Issued by

About this file

From the source

Q&A through 2/5/2018

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid_Tabulation_A_and_X_HALE_10(2).pdf PDF
HI_FTNP_HALE_10(2)_Haleakala_Bid_Summary_ver2.pdf PDF
HI_FTNP_HALE_10(2)_Haleakala_Bid_Summary.pdf PDF
Amendment_A002_2.7.2018.pdf PDF
Amendment_A001.pdf PDF
HI FTNP HALE 10(2) Cross Sections.pdf PDF
100915-H&H_Tech_Memo.pdf PDF
Final_Hale_Pavement_Report_3_revised_4-13-09.pdf PDF
DTFH6817B00034.pdf PDF
Figure_3_-Watershed_quad[1].pdf PDF
HALE_10(2)_Drainage_Inspection_Report.pdf PDF
ZC10046_GeoLabs_HALE_FinalReport-Rev1.pdf PDF
HI FTNP HALE 10(2) Plans.pdf PDF
Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Solicitation No DTFH6817B00034 HI FTNP Hale 10(2) Haleakala National Park Rehabilitation

Questions & Answers

2/5/2018

• Recommend a polymer modified binder PG76-22, due to past failures of OGFC pavements in the past. Current specification is for PG64-16.

A PG 76-22 binder would exceed the contract requirements and would be allowed, but not required.

• The Gradation (Per Table 703-4 F) for the OGFC. Can not be obtain with the current "A" Grade aggregates available.

Please provide additional clarification to your question. The required gradation or similar has been used successfully on previous projects.

File details come from the government source that posted it.